CMA-ADAPTED PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The Star Paper Division of Royal Industries is located near Los Angeles. A major expansion of the division’s only plant was completed in April 2015. The expansion consisted of an addition to the existing building, additions to the production line machinery, and the replacement of obsolete and fully depreciated equipment that was no longer efficient or cost-effective.
On May 1, 2015, George Harris became manager of Star. Harris had a meeting with Marie Fortner, vice president of operations for Royal, who explained to Harris that the company measured the performance of divisions and division managers on the basis of return on gross assets (ROA). When Harris asked if other measures were used in conjunction with ROA, Fortner replied, “Royal’s top management prefers to use a single performance measure. Star should do well this year now that it has expanded and replaced all of that old equipment. You should have no problem exceeding the division’s historical rate. I’ll check with you at the end of each quarter to see how you are doing.” Fortner called Harris after the first quarter results were completed because Star’s ROA was considerably below the historical rate for the division. Harris told Fortner that he did not believe that ROA was a valid performance measure for Star. Fortner indicated that she would discuss this with others at headquarters and get back to Harris. However, there was no further discussion of the use of ROA but only reports on divisional performance at the end of the second and third quarters. Now that the fiscal year has ended, Harris has received the memorandum in the figure designated for Problem 14.
PROBLEM 14: PERFORMANCE MEASURES
TO: George Harris, Star Paper Division
FROM: Marie Fortner, Royal Industries
SUBJECT: Divisional Performance
The operating results for the fourth quarter and for our fiscal year ended on April 30 are now complete. Your fourth quarter return on gross assets was only 9 percent, resulting in a return for the year of slightly under 11 percent. I recall discussing your low return after the first quarter and reminding you after the second and third quarters that this level of return is not considered adequate for the Star Paper Division. The return on gross assets at Star has ranged from 15 to 18 percent for the past five years. An 11 percent return may be acceptable at some of Royal’s other divisions, but not at a proven winner like Star, especially in light of your recently improved facility. Please arrange to meet with me in the near future to discuss ways to restore Star’s return on gross assets to its former level.
Harris is looking forward to meeting with Fortner as he plans to pursue the discussion about the appropriateness of ROA as a performance measure for Star. While the ROA for Star is below historical levels, the division’s profits for the year are higher than at any previous time. Harris is going to recommend that ROA be replaced with multiple criteria for evaluating performance—namely, dollar profit, receivable turnover, and inventory turnover.
Required
- a. Identify general criteria that should be used in selecting performance measures to evaluate operating managers.
- b. Describe the probable cause of the decline in the Star Paper Division’s return on gross assets during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
- c. On the basis of the relationship between Fortner and Harris, as well as the memorandum from Fortner, discuss apparent weaknesses in the performance evaluation process at Royal Industries.
- d. Discuss whether the multiple performance evaluation criteria that Harris suggested would be appropriate for the evaluation of the Star Paper Division.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 8 Solutions
Accounting Information Systems
- The following environmental cost reports for 20x3, 20x4, and 20x5 (year end December 31) are for the Communications Products Division of Kartel, a telecommunications company. In 2011, Kartel committed itself to a continuous environmental improvement program, which was implemented throughout the company. At the beginning of 20x5, Kartel began a new program of recycling nonhazardous scrap. The effort produced recycling income totaling 25,000. The marketing vice president and the environmental manager estimated that sales revenue had increased by 200,000 per year since 20x3 because of an improved public image relative to environmental performance. The companys Finance Department also estimated that Kartel saved 80,000 in 20x5 because of reduced finance and insurance costs, all attributable to improved environmental performance. All reductions in environmental costs from 20x3 to 20x5 are attributable to improvement efforts. Furthermore, any reductions represent ongoing savings. Required: 1. Prepare an environmental financial statement for 20x5 (for the Products Division). In the cost section, classify environmental costs by category (prevention, detection, etc.). 2. Evaluate the changes in environmental performance.arrow_forwardGemma Company is a midsize manufacturing company with 120 employees and approximately $45 million in sales. Management has established a set of processes to purchase fixed assets, described in the following paragraphs: When a user department decides to purchase a new fixed asset, the departmental manager prepares an asset request form. When completing the form, the manager must describe the fixed asset, the advantages or efficiencies offered by the asset, and estimates of costs and benefits. The asset request form is forwarded to the director of finance. Personnel in the finance department review estimates of costs and benefits and revise these if necessary. A discounted cash flow analysis is prepared and forwarded to the vice president of operations, who reviews the asset request forms and the discounted cash flow analysis, and then interviews user department managers if he or she feels it is warranted. After this review, she selects assets to purchase until she has exhausted the…arrow_forwardIn 20x5, Major Company initiated a full-scale, quality improvement program. At the end of the year, Jack Aldredge, the president, noted with some satisfaction that the defects per unit of product had dropped significantly compared to the prior year. He was also pleased that relationships with suppliers had improved and defective materials had declined. The new quality training program was also well accepted by employees. Of most interest to the president, however, was the impact of the quality improvements on profitability. To help assess the dollar impact of the quality improvements, the actual sales and the actual quality costs for 20x4 and 20x5 are as follows by quality category: All prevention costs are fixed (by discretion). Assume all other quality costs are unit-level variable. Required: 1. Compute the relative distribution of quality costs for each year and prepare a pie chart. Do you believe that the company is moving in the right direction in terms of the balance among the quality cost categories? Explain. 2. Prepare a one-year trend performance report for 20x5 (compare the actual costs of 20x5 with those of 20x4, adjusted for differences in sales volume). How much have profits increased because of the quality improvements made by Major Company? 3. Estimate the additional improvement in profits if Major Company ultimately reduces its quality costs to 2.5 percent of sales revenues (assume sales of 10 million).arrow_forward
- In response to intensive foreign competition, the management of Florex Company has attempted over the past year to improve the quality of its products. A statistical process control system has been installed and other steps have been taken to decrease the amount of warranty and other field costs, which have been trending upward over the past several years. Costs relating to quality and quality control over the last two years are given below: Inspection Quality engineering Depreciation of test equipment Rework labor Statistical process control Cost of field servicing Supplies used in testing Systems development Warranty repairs Costs (in thousands) Last Year This Year $ 660 $ 1,215 $ 300 $ 600 $ 300 $ 225 $ 900 $ 0 $ 300 $ 1,200 $ 30 $ 1,500 $ 1,050 $ 60 $ 750 Net cost of scrap Product testing ces Product recalls Disposal of defective products $ 900 $ 3,375 $ 450 $ 1,110 $ 2,625 $ 1,350 $ 900 $ 1,350 $ 750 $ 750 $ 750 Sales have been flat over the past few years, at $75,000,000 per…arrow_forwardIn response to intensive foreign competition, the management of Florex Company has attempted over the past year to improve the quality of its products. A statistical process control system has been installed and other steps have been taken to decrease the amount of warranty and other field costs, which have been trending upward over the past several years. Costs relating to quality and quality control over the last two years are given below: Inspection Quality engineering Depreciation of test equipment Rework labor Statistical process control Cost of field servicing Supplies used in testing Systems development Warranty repairs Net cost of scrap Product testing Product recalls Disposal of defective products Costs (in thousands) Last Year This Year $ 1,092 $ 42 $ 840 $ 1,218 $ 420 $ 630 $ 630 $ 420 $ 1,260 $ 0 $ 1,680 $ 210 $ 1,260 $ 42 $ 840 $ 840 $ 1,344 $ 420 $ 1,008 $ 2,100 $ 1,260 $ 1,260 $ 924 $ 840 $ 840 $ 3,780 Sales have been flat over the past few years, at $84,000,000 per…arrow_forwardDataSpan, Inc., automated its plant at the start of the current year and installed a flexiblemanufacturing system. The company is also evaluating its suppliers and moving toward LeanProduction. Many adjustment problems have been encountered, including problems relating toperformance measurement. After much study, the company has decided to use the performancemeasures below, and it has gathered data relating to these measures for the first four months ofoperations.Month1 2 3 4Throughput time (days) ? ? ? ?Delivery cycle time (days) ? ? ? ?Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) ? ? ? ?Percentage of on-time deliveries 91% 86% 82% 78%Total sales (units) 3460 3312 3143 3025Management has asked for your help in computing throughput time, delivery cycle time, and MCE.The following average times have been logged over the last four months: Average per Month (in days)1 2 3 4Move time per unit 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6Process time per unit 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5Wait time per order before start of production 23.0…arrow_forward
- Tombro Industries is in the process of automating one of its plants and developing a flexible manufacturing system. The company is finding it necessary to make many changes in operating procedures. Progress has been slow, particularly in trying to develop new performance measures for the factory. In an effort to evaluate performance and determine where improvements can be made, management has gathered the following data relating to activities over the last four months: Month 1 2 3 4 Quality control measures: Number of defects 201 179 140 98 Number of warranty claims 62 55 46 43 Number of customer complaints 118 112 95 74 Material control measures: Purchase order lead time 10 days 9 days 7 days 5 days Scrap as a percent of total cost 1% 1% 2% 3% Machine performance measures: Machine downtime as a percentage of availability 5% 6% 6% 10% Use as a percentage of…arrow_forwardThe president of Mission Inc. has been concerned about the growth in costs over the last several years. The president asked the controller to perform an activity analysis to gain a better insight into these costs. The activity analysis revealed the following: Activities Activity Cost Correcting invoice errors $8,500 Disposing of income materials with poor quality 16,000 Disposing of scrap 28,500 Expediting late production 21,500 Final inspection 19,000 Inspecting incoming materials 5,000 Inspecting work in process 25,000 Preventive machine maintenance 15,000 Producing product 95,500 Responding to customer quality complaints 15,000 Total 249,000 The production process is complicated by quality problems, requiring the production manager to expedite production and dispose of scrap. Prepare a Pareto chart of the company activities. Classify the activities into prevention, appraisal, internal failure,…arrow_forwardEquipment replacement decisions and performance evaluation. Susan Smith manages the Wexford plant of Sanchez Manufacturing. A representative of Darnell Engineering approaches Smith about replacing a large piece of manufacturing equipment that Sanchez uses in its process with a more efficient model. While the representative made some compelling arguments in favor of replacing the 3-year-old equipment, Smith is hesitant. Smith is hoping to be promoted next year to manager of the larger Detroit plant, and she knows that the accrual-basis net operating income of the Wexford plant will be evaluated closely as part of the promotion decision. The following information is available concerning the equipment replacement decision: Sanchez uses straight-line depreciation on all equipment. Annual depreciation expense for the old machine is $180,000 and will be $270,000 on the new machine if it is acquired. For simplicity, ignore income taxes and the time value of money.arrow_forward
- In response to intense foreign competition, Florex Company has taken steps to improve the quality of its products. A summary of its quality costs (in thousands) over the past two years is given below: Inspection Quality engineering Depreciation of test equipment Rework labor Statistical process control Cost of field servicing Prevention costs: Total prevention costs Appraisal costs Total appraisal costs Internal failure costs: Total internal failure costs External failure costs: Costs (in thousands) Last Year This Year $ 630 $ 918 $ 540 $ 720 $ 180 Supplies used in testing Systems development Warranty repairs Net cost of scrap Product testing Product recalls $ 720 $ 990 $ 2,610 Disposal of production defects $ 900 Sales have been flat over the past few years, at $90,000,000 per year. Required: 1. Prepare a quality cost report for this year and last year. Note: Enter amount values in thousands. Round your percentage answers to 2 decimal places (i.e 0.1234 should be entered as 12.34).…arrow_forwardBorealis Manufacturing has just completed a major change in its quality control (QC) process. Previously, products had been reviewed by QC inspectors at the end of each major process, and the company’s 10 QC inspectors were charged as direct labor to the operation or job. In an effort to improve efficiency and quality, a computerized video QC system was purchased for 250,000. The system consists of a minicomputer, 15 video cameras, other peripheral hardware, and software. The new system uses cameras stationed by QC engineers at key points in the production process. Each time an operation changes or there is a new operation, the cameras are moved, and a new master picture is loaded into the computer by a QC engineer. The camera takes pictures of the units in process, and the computer compares them to the picture of a “good” unit. Any differences are sent to a QC engineer, who removes the bad units and "discusses the flaws with the production supervisors. The new system has replaced the…arrow_forwardRequired Information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] McKeoun Enterprises is a large machine tool company now experiencing alarming increases in maintenance expense in each of its four production departments. Maintenance costs are currently allocated to the production departments on the basis of direct labor hours incurred in the production department. To provide pressure for the production departments to use less maintenance, and to provide an incentive for the maintenance department to become more efficient, McKeoun has decided to investigate new methods of allocating maintenance costs. One suggestion now being evaluated is a form of outsourcing. The producing departments could purchase maintenance service from an outside supplier. That is, they could choose elther to use an outside supplier of maintenance or to be charged an amount based on their use of direct labor hours. The following table shows the direct labor hours in each department, the…arrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Financial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College Pub