(a)
Explanation of Solution
According the Categorical Imperative:
Categorical Imperative:
Categorical imperative signifies a complete requirement or a law that must be followed in all situations and is acceptable as an end in it.
Categorical imperative: Refers to “true at all time and also in all situations”
Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals products; while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson wants the former to be honest and complains to the owner.
As per categorical imperative, the salesperson is involved in unethical (dishonest) practices. If he wants the other salesperson to be honest he must follows the guidelines in all situations...
(b)
Explanation of Solution
According to Utilitarian Perspective:
Utilitarian perspective:
Utilitarianism is nothing but a moral theory that states that the greatest act is the one that increases utility.
Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals things, while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson accepts his mistakes to the owner and pays back the money.
As per utilitarian perspective, the salesperson’s work is not only to attain the goal; he should also need to maintain the shop’s image...
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
Using MIS (10th Edition)
- The use of the internet as a platform for exercising one's right to free speech is becoming more widespread as time goes on. Facebook and Twitter are being used by a lot of different persons and groups to disseminate hate speech. Should there be no restrictions placed on free speech on the internet, considering the medium? Should hate speech be restricted on social media platforms?arrow_forwardThe use of the internet as a platform for exercising one's right to free speech is becoming more widespread as time goes on. Facebook and Twitter are being used by a variety of different people and organisations to promote hate speech. Should there be no restrictions placed on free speech on the internet, considering the medium? Should social media ban hate speech?arrow_forwardThe Internet has become a significant medium for exercising one's right to free speech. Numerous individuals and organizations use Facebook and Twitter to propagate hate speech. Should there be no restrictions on expression in online discussion forums? How far should restrictions on hate speech on social media go?arrow_forward
- The use of the internet is now required in order to properly exercise one's right to freedom of expression. A significant number of individuals and groups are using social media platforms to disseminate hate speech. Should there be any limits placed on the right to free expression online? How can internet platforms make certain that obscene or nasty comments are not posted?arrow_forwardThe Internet has developed into a crucial medium for the exercise of one's right to freedom of expression. Facebook and Twitter are both being used by a large number of individuals and groups to disseminate hate speech. Should there be no limits placed on what people may say online? Where should the line be drawn when it comes to limiting hate speech on social media?arrow_forwardThe use of the Internet as a vital instrument for exercising one's right to free speech has gained popularity swiftly. Many people, including organizations, exploit the influence that social media sites like Facebook and Twitter provide them to spread hate speech. Does it make sense for there to be no restrictions on freedom of speech on the internet? What steps should social media sites take to stop the spread of hate speech?arrow_forward
- B. Below are the topic sentences of the main part of an essay on the dangers of the Internet. Read the sentences a-h and decide in which paragraph they belong. Then write the sentences in the correct paragraph and in a logical order. Despite the many benefits of the Internet, there a. Another aspect that needs to be considered is are also many dangers for users. that people can easily fall victim to deception on the Internet. b. Furthermore, it is evident that authorities should work on establishing strict laws regarding cybercrime. c. One of the biggest is viruses, which are usually downloaded from the Internet or transmitted through attachments in e-mails. d. Since the Internet is an environment that is ungoverned by laws or rules, it is easy for crimes, like fraud and identity theft to be mmitted. It is important to deal with these problems e. Firstly, viruses can be avoided by using by taking specific measures concerning online effective antivirus software. security. f. This way…arrow_forwardAs more time passes, an increasing number of individuals are turning to the internet in order to exercise their rights to free speech under the First Amendment. Facebook and Twitter are being used by a diverse spectrum of users and organisations to facilitate the dissemination of hate speech. When taking into account the nature of the medium, should there be any limitations placed on free expression on the internet? Is it essential to place restrictions on the ability to express hatred on social media platforms?arrow_forwardInternet usage for free expression is growing. Several people and organisations spread hatred on Facebook and Twitter. Given the medium, should online speech be unrestricted? Should social media ban hate speech?arrow_forward
- The use of the Internet has become indispensable for exercising one's right to free speech. Hate speech is spread over social media by a large number of people and organizations. Should there be restrictions on free speech online? How can online platforms ensure that hateful remarks are not posted?arrow_forwardThe Internet has quickly achieved reputation as a critical tool for exercising one's right to free expression, and it continues to grow in popularity. Many people and even groups have taken use of the power provided to them by social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter to disseminate hate speech. Given the nature of the medium, is it appropriate for freedom of expression to be unrestricted on the internet? Are there any particular steps that social media platforms should take to prevent the spread of hate speech?arrow_forwardThe Internet is now essential for free speech. Facebook and Twitter are used by many to propagate hate speech. Should online discussions allow free speech? Is social media hate speech zero-tolerance?arrow_forward
- Database System ConceptsComputer ScienceISBN:9780078022159Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. SudarshanPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationStarting Out with Python (4th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780134444321Author:Tony GaddisPublisher:PEARSONDigital Fundamentals (11th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780132737968Author:Thomas L. FloydPublisher:PEARSON
- C How to Program (8th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780133976892Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey DeitelPublisher:PEARSONDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337627900Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage LearningProgrammable Logic ControllersComputer ScienceISBN:9780073373843Author:Frank D. PetruzellaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education