Using MIS (10th Edition)
Using MIS (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9780134606996
Author: David M. Kroenke, Randall J. Boyle
Publisher: PEARSON
Expert Solution & Answer
Book Icon
Chapter 7.4, Problem 1EGDQ

(a)

Explanation of Solution

According the Categorical Imperative:

Categorical Imperative:

Categorical imperative signifies a complete requirement or a law that must be followed in all situations and is acceptable as an end in it.

Categorical imperative: Refers to “true at all time and also in all situations”

Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals products; while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson wants the former to be honest and complains to the owner.

As per categorical imperative, the salesperson is involved in unethical (dishonest) practices. If he wants the other salesperson to be honest he must follows the guidelines in all situations...

(b)

Explanation of Solution

According to Utilitarian Perspective:

Utilitarian perspective:

Utilitarianism is nothing but a moral theory that states that the greatest act is the one that increases utility.

Example: Consider two salespersons working in a shop and one person frequently steals things, while the other steals rarely for his family situations. Here, the later salesperson accepts his mistakes to the owner and pays back the money.

As per utilitarian perspective, the salesperson’s work is not only to attain the goal; he should also need to maintain the shop’s image...

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
The use of the Internet as a forum for expressing one's right to free speech has become more significant in recent years. Both Facebook and Twitter are being used by a diverse range of individuals and organizations to facilitate the dissemination of hate speech. Should there be no restrictions put on what people may say in online discussion forums? Where should the line be drawn when it comes to restricting hate speech on social media?
The Internet has rapidly emerged as one of the most popular platforms for exercising one's right to free expression, and this trend is expected to continue. Facebook and Twitter are both being used by a large number of individuals and groups to disseminate hate speech. Given the nature of the medium, should the internet provide unrestricted free speech? Should there be limits placed on hate speech on social media?
In recent years, the Internet has swiftly developed into a crucial instrument that may be used by individuals to exercise their right to freedom of speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment. Some people are spreading hate speech via social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. This is an unfortunate reality. Should there be no limits placed on people's ability to express themselves freely on the internet? What measures need to be taken by social media platforms in order to stop the propagation of anti-Semitic content?
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780134444321
Author:Tony Gaddis
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780132737968
Author:Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780133976892
Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337627900
Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:9780073373843
Author:Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education