Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134870069
Author: William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 81FE
To determine
Calculate the present worth.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The incremental rate of return method allows for the evaluation of each increment of increased
initial cost for alternatives that could be added to an initial investment.
Select one:
True
False
30
Upload the picture of your complete solutions including the correct cash flow diagram (for plus points) and your conclusion.
You are faced with a decision on an investment proposal. Specifically, the estimated additional income from the investment is $125,000 per year; the investment cost is $400,000; and the first year estimated expense of $20,000 and will increase a rate of 5% per year. Assume an 8-year analysis period, no salvage value, and MARR = 15% per year.
a. Calculate the PW and FW of this proposal?
b. What is the ERR ( Ԑ=MARR) of this proposal?
c. What is the Simple and Discounted payback?
The ROR analysis evaluates the increments between two alternatives in pairwise comparisons.
Select one:
O a. True
Ob. False
Chapter 6 Solutions
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Ch. 6 - An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to...Ch. 6 - The Consolidated Oil Company must install...Ch. 6 - One of the mutually exclusive alternatives below...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are...Ch. 6 - Prob. 5PCh. 6 - Prob. 6PCh. 6 - Fiesta Foundry is considering a new furnace that...Ch. 6 - Prob. 8PCh. 6 - DuPont claims that its synthetic composites will...Ch. 6 - Prob. 10P
Ch. 6 - Which alternative in the table below should be...Ch. 6 - Prob. 12PCh. 6 - The alternatives for an engineering project to...Ch. 6 - Prob. 14PCh. 6 - Prob. 15PCh. 6 - Prob. 16PCh. 6 - Refer to the situation in Problem 6-16. Most...Ch. 6 - An old, heavily used warehouse currently has an...Ch. 6 - Prob. 19PCh. 6 - Two electric motors (A and B) are being considered...Ch. 6 - Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are...Ch. 6 - Pamela recently moved to Celebration, Florida, an...Ch. 6 - Environmentally conscious companies are looking...Ch. 6 - Prob. 24PCh. 6 - Two 100 horsepower motors are being considered for...Ch. 6 - In the Rawhide Company (a leather products...Ch. 6 - Refer to Problem 6-2. Solve this problem using the...Ch. 6 - Prob. 28PCh. 6 - Prob. 29PCh. 6 - Two electric motors are being considered to drive...Ch. 6 - Prob. 31PCh. 6 - Prob. 32PCh. 6 - Prob. 33PCh. 6 - Potable water is in short supply in many...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives...Ch. 6 - Prob. 36PCh. 6 - A companys MARR is 10% per year. Two mutually...Ch. 6 - Prob. 38PCh. 6 - a. Compare the probable part cost from Machine A...Ch. 6 - A one-mile section of a roadway in Florida has...Ch. 6 - Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being...Ch. 6 - Prob. 42PCh. 6 - IBM is considering an environmentally conscious...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive earth-moving pieces of...Ch. 6 - A piece of production equipment is to be replaced...Ch. 6 - Prob. 46PCh. 6 - Prob. 47PCh. 6 - Prob. 48PCh. 6 - Prob. 49PCh. 6 - Prob. 50PCh. 6 - Prob. 51PCh. 6 - Prob. 52PCh. 6 - Prob. 53PCh. 6 - Use the imputed market value technique to...Ch. 6 - Prob. 55PCh. 6 - Prob. 56PCh. 6 - Prob. 57PCh. 6 - Prob. 58PCh. 6 - Prob. 59PCh. 6 - Prob. 60PCh. 6 - Prob. 61PCh. 6 - Prob. 62PCh. 6 - Prob. 63PCh. 6 - Prob. 64PCh. 6 - Prob. 65PCh. 6 - Prob. 66PCh. 6 - Three models of baseball bats will be manufactured...Ch. 6 - Refer to Example 6-3. Re-evaluate the recommended...Ch. 6 - Prob. 69SECh. 6 - Prob. 70SECh. 6 - Prob. 71SECh. 6 - Prob. 72CSCh. 6 - Prob. 73CSCh. 6 - Prob. 74CSCh. 6 - Prob. 75FECh. 6 - Prob. 76FECh. 6 - Prob. 77FECh. 6 - Complete the following analysis of cost...Ch. 6 - Prob. 79FECh. 6 - For the following table, assume a MARR of 10% per...Ch. 6 - Prob. 81FECh. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Prob. 83FECh. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Consider the mutually exclusive alternatives given...Ch. 6 - Prob. 87FE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The following five alternatives that are evaluated by the rate of return method, If the alternatives are independent and the MARR is 15% per year, the onels) to select is (are) Incremental ROR, N. When Compared with Alternative Initial Investment,S Alternative Alternative A BC DE 10.6 27.3 194 353 25.0 -25,000 -35,000 13.1 38.5 24.4 -40,000 13.4 46.5 27.3 26.8 -60,000 25.4 -75,000 20.2 Only D O Only D and E O Only A D, and E O Only Earrow_forwardAlternative A and B are two mutually exclusive cost alternatives, and one of them must be selected. Using Incremental Analysis, which of the alternatives should be recommended based on ERR (the External Rate of Return)? · MARR (Minimum acceptable rate of return) is 12% per year while the re-investment rate is 10% per year. The study period is 20 years. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison. Alternative A B $ (101,000) $ (6,000) 20 years $ (6,000) $ (18,500 ) 10 years Initial capital investment Annual operating expenses Useful life Salvage value None Nonearrow_forwardBahrain Metals company is considering installing solar roof panels to reduce the cost of the electricity bills. The ROR of Alternative A is 8%, the Future Worth of Alternative B is $17,234, the Present Worth of Alternative C is $11,946, and the Annual Worth of Alternative D is $2,948. Assume all alternatives have a 5-year useful life and that the MARR for the company is 10%. The alternative that should be chosen is: O A C Do nothing Not enough information B.arrow_forward
- What is the rate of return for the following incremental analysis. Investment 1 2 Initial Investment $29,857 $40,955 Annual Return $14,657 $13,650 Salvage Value $29,857 $40,955arrow_forwardAn industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select. 3. An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). Capital investment Annual operating expenses Useful Life New Baghouse $1,140,000 $115,500 10 years New ESP $992,500 $73,200 10 years The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select.arrow_forwardTheoretically, when we are going through the procedure to calculate the incremental ROR (ΔROR), we will assume that the “current best” option is “do nothing (DNT).” a) true b) falsearrow_forward
- The PW-based relation for the incremental cash flow series to find A/* between the lower first-cost alternative X and alternative Y has been developed. 0=-38,000+9000(P/A‚¡ *,10) + (-2000(P/F,Ai*,10)) Determine the highest MARR value for which Y is preferred over X. Any MARR value less than % favors Y.arrow_forwardNadine Chelesvig has patented her invention. She is offering a potential manufacturer two contracts for the exclusive right to manufacture and market her product. Plan A calls for an immediate single lump sum payment to her of $30,000. Plan B calls for an annual payment of $1,000 plus a royalty of $0.50 per unit sold. The remaining life of the patent is10 years. Nadine uses a MARR of 10%/year. Solve, a. What must be the uniform annual sales volume of the product for Nadine to be indifferent between the contracts, based on a present worth analysis? b. If the sales volume is below the volume determined in (a), which contract would the manufacturer prefer?arrow_forwardYou plan to purchase new machines that will allow your company to manufacture at a much quicker rate. The machines cost $15,000 and produce annual revenue benefits of $2000 (MARR = 4%). What is the breakeven point?arrow_forward
- Advanced Modular Technology (AMT) makes energy cleaner, safer, more secure and more efficient. It typically exhibits net annual revenues that increase over a fairly long period. In the long run, an AMT project may be profitable as measured by IRR, but its simple payback period may be unacceptable. Evaluate this AMT project using the IRR method when the company MARR is 13% per year and its maximum allowable payback period is two years. What is your recommendation? $98,000 $2,000 + Capital investment at time 0 Net revenues in year k $10,000 • (k- 1) $9,000 Market (salvage) value Life 4 yearsarrow_forwardA cost-saving device has no salvage value after 5 years. Two options: Device A: Costs $10,000 & saves $3000 annually Device B: Costs $13,500 & saves $3000 the 1st year & increases $500 annually Which alternative should be selected using incremental ROR analysis, MARR=7%?arrow_forwardA deep water port for imported liquefied natural gas (LNG) is needed for three years. At the end of the third year, it will cost more to dismantle the LNG facility than it produces in revenues. The cash flows are estimated as follows: The IRR for this LNG facility is closest to which choice below? Choose the closest answer below. A. The IRR for the LNG facility is 9.5% per year. B. The IRR for the LNG facility is 4.7% per year. C. The IRR for the LNG facility is 12.2% per year. D. The IRR for the LNG facility is 14.6% per year. EOY 0 1 2 3 Net Cash Flow - $54 million 44 million 40 million - 24 millionarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education