EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 4, Problem 4.10P

a)

To determine

To show: The way L can benefit from renter’s insurance by using two-state diagram.

b)

To determine

To evaluate: The insurance that G should buy to offset the expected loss.

c)

To determine

To explain: The reason because of which L does not want G to buy an unfair insurance policy.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
The lecture mentions that diminishing marginal utility applies to the consumption of money as well as the consumption of certain food. Can you give another example where diminishing marginal utility applies? Can you think of any example where diminishing marginal utility does not apply? From utility theory, the demand for insurance depends on the level of risk aversion (i.e. how much you hate uncertainty), the cost of insurance (i.e. if it is within your willingness to pay), as well as wealth. Can you think of anything else that affects demand for insurance? One of the predictions of prospect theory is that we tend to be overly concerned with relatively small risk. Can you think of any example (besides those given in the lecture) that either speaks to this or is an exception?
In September 2020, Ms. Sarah arranged health insurance. In 2021, Ms. Sarah made a claim for the costs of an MRI and a cortisone injection, because she had a cyst on the left side of her spine. The insurer requested Sarah's medical notes and found she hadn’t disclosed 2 previous spinal injuries from 2013 and 2016. Ms. Sarah didn't inform her insurance company the full details of her medical history and she said that she wasn't aware that she has to disclose her health situation to the insurance company. Therefore, she Made a claim to her insurance company to cover these bills. Required: Determine whether she can claim the hospital expenses under her insurance policy? And justify your answer with reasonable justifications?
Scenario 2 Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c).  Tess and Lex both have the utility function (sqrt c) .  Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year.  Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event.  Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. Refer to Scenario 2 Suppose that insurance companies do not know specific probabilities of adverse events for Tess or Lex, but do know the average probability of an adverse event. If they assumed that both Tess and Lex purchase full insurance, what is the actuarially fair premium charged? Round to two decimal places
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:Cengage
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning