Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains (12th Edition) (What's New in Operations Management)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9780134741062
Author: Lee J. Krajewski, Manoj K. Malhotra, Larry P. Ritzman
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 25P
A
Summary Introduction
To determine: Dintell should fund the project or not.
Introduction: Financial analysis is the process related to budget, planning, organizing the business as a whole.
B
Summary Introduction
To determine: The effect of the market on the decision.
Introduction: Financial analysis is the process related to budget, planning, organizing the business as a whole.
C
Summary Introduction
To determine: The effect will arise on increase and decrease in discount rate.
Introduction: Financial analysis is the process related to budget, planning, organizing the business as a whole.
D
Summary Introduction
To determine: The effect will arise on the next decision.
Introduction: Financial analysis is the process related to budget, planning, organizing the business as a whole.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
SBC Packers Co. is a logistics company owned by Engr. Sheera Bee Cabanlit. Anticipating the growing demand for delivery services, she developed a strategic plan for the year 2022. The options are to hire additional delivery crews in their Mandaue facility, construct a new facility in Talisay City, or subcontract Ohlala Move, a small-time company. A study conducted by the marketing department forecasted the following payoff values, which are summarized in the table below. The values are expressed as gains and alpha = 0.4. *
What is the best decision alternative under Maximax criterion? (Provide complete decision table solution)
What is the best of the best payoff value?
What is the best of the worst decision alternative?
Which decision alternative has a minimum payoff value from the maximum regrets?
Which realism approach decision alternative has maximum payoff?
SBC Packers Co. is a logistics company owned by Engr. Sheera Bee Cabanlit. Anticipating the growing demand for delivery services, she developed a strategic plan for the year 2022. The options are to hire additional delivery crews in their Mandaue facility, construct a new facility in Talisay City, or subcontract Ohlala Move, a small-time company. A study conducted by the marketing department forecasted the following payoff values, which are summarized in the table below. The values are expressed as gains and alpha = 0.4. *
Which decision alternative has a minimum payoff value from the maximum regrets?
Which realism approach decision alternative has maximum payoff?
DiHL Co. is a Danao-based logistics company owned by Engr. Donald H. Lalican. Anticipating the growing demand for delivery services, he developed a strategic plan for the year 2022. The options are to hire additional delivery crews in their Mandaue facility, construct a new facility in Talisay City, or subcontract Ohlala Move, a small-time company. A study conducted by the marketing department forecasted the following payoff values, which are summarized in the table below. The values are expressed as gains and alpha = 0.6. *What is the best decision alternative under Maximax criterion? (Provide complete decision table solution)
Chapter 4 Solutions
Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains (12th Edition) (What's New in Operations Management)
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1DQCh. 4 - Prob. 2DQCh. 4 - The Dahlia Medical Center has 30 labor rooms, 15...Ch. 4 - A process currently services an average of 50...Ch. 4 - An airline company must plan its fleet capacity...Ch. 4 - Food Goblin Supermarkets use both cashiers and...Ch. 4 - Returning to Problem 4, under both assumption of...Ch. 4 - Purple Swift manufactures birdhouses in lots of...Ch. 4 - Macon Controls produces three different types of...Ch. 4 - Up, Up, and Away is a producer of kites and wind...
Ch. 4 - Tuff-Rider, Inc. manufactures touring bikes and...Ch. 4 - Arabelle is considering expanding the floor area...Ch. 4 - The Astro World amusement park has the opportunity...Ch. 4 - Kim Epson operates a full-service car wash, which...Ch. 4 - MKM International is seeking to purchase a new CNC...Ch. 4 - Prob. 17PCh. 4 - Prob. 18PCh. 4 - Prob. 19PCh. 4 - Dawson Electronics is a manufacturer of high-tech...Ch. 4 - A manager is trying to decide whether to buy one...Ch. 4 - Acme Steel Fabricators experienced booming...Ch. 4 - Referring to Problem 7, the operations manager at...Ch. 4 - Darren Mack owns the Gas n’ Go convenience store...Ch. 4 - Prob. 25PCh. 4 - Prob. 1VCCh. 4 - Prob. 2VCCh. 4 - How does Southwest Airlines know they are...Ch. 4 - Prob. 4VCCh. 4 - Prob. 1CCh. 4 - Prob. 2CCh. 4 - Prob. 3C
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardGamers Empire is considering marketing one of two new video games for the coming holiday season: Aliens Kidnapped My Dog or Ninjas vs. Pirates. Aliens Kidnapped My Dog does not appear to have any competition as it is a unique game. Estimated profits (in thousands of dollars) under high, medium and low demand are as follows: Demand Aliens Kidnapped My Dog High Medium Low Profit $1100 $800 $400 Probability 0.3 0.4 0.3 Gamers Empire is optimistic about Ninjas vs. Pirates. However, the concern is that profitability will be affect by their competitor Samurai Games releasing a similar title called Samurai vs. Robots. Estimated profits (in thousands of dollars) with and without competition are as follows: Demand Ninjas vs. Pirates with competition High Medium Low Profit $900 $500 $300 Probability 0.3 0.3 0.4 Ninjas vs. Pirates without competition Profit $1700 $900 $500 Probability 0.5 0.2 0.3 a) Construct a decision tree. b) Calculate the EMVs and state your decision if there is a 75%…arrow_forward
- Edwards Machine Tools needs to purchase a new machine. The basic model is slower but costs less, while the advanced model is faster but costs more. Profitability will depend on future demand. The following table presents an estimate of profits over the next three years. Decision Low Medium High Basic Model $65,000 $85,000 $125,000 Advanced Model $70,000 $140,000 $240,000 Given the uncertainty associated with the demand volume and no other information to work with, how would you make a decision? Use the Excel template Decision Analysis and explain your reasoning.arrow_forwardBenoit Manufacturing Company manufactures and sells parts for various musical gadgets. The following information to a single part which is used in the production of a wind instrument. The business earned Operating Income of $220,000 in 2019, when production was 3,000 units and the president of Darius is under pressure from shareholders to increase operating income in 2020 and is therefore considering the implementation of strategies mainly geared at increasing revenues and or decreasing variable costs. Data for variable cost per unit and total fixed costs were as follows: Variable expenses per unit: Direct Material $58 Direct Labour $74 Variable Manufacturing Overhead $48 Fixed expenses: Fixed Manufacturing Overhead $215,000 Fixed Selling Costs $65,000 Fixed Administrative Costs $160,000 The President of Benoit is under pressure from shareholders to increase operating income by 50% in 2020. Management…arrow_forwardEnglish Petroleum (EP) has to decide whether or not to drill for oil in a particular place. After its recent disaster in gulf, it has decided to conduct a thorough analysis before venturing into any new exploration projects. An in-house analysis revealed the following information: There are three possible results of drilling: a high yield with NPV $100 million, a moderate yield with NPV $50 million, or no oil. The drilling operation costs $50 million. At similar places, 50%, 30%, and 20% of previous drillings have given high, moderate, or no yield respectively. 1. Should EP drill for oil? What is the expected value associated with the decision. Now suppose a seismic test is available which would indicate a favorable, neutral, or discouraging prospects for the drilling. • There is a 52% chance the test will give favorable results; if it does, the respective probabilities of High, Moderate, or No yield become 35/52, 15/52, and 2/52. • There is a 22% chance the test will give neutral…arrow_forward
- Given is a decision payoff table and a Sub Decision Payoff Table. Use Minimax Regret as an evaluation criterion to evaluate alternatives. Future Demand Alternatives Low Moderate High Small Facility 31 18 15 Medium Facility 20 35 21 Large Facility -10 31 35 Alternatives Worst Regrets Small Facility ? Medium Facility ? Large Facility ? a) The worst regrets for alternative Small Facility is ( ) b) The worst regrets for alternative Medium Facility is ( ) c) The worst regrets for alternative Large Facility is ( ) d) The best course of action or decision by using Minimax Regret is to select ( ) facilityarrow_forwardGiven is a decision payoff table and a Sub Decision Payoff Table. Use Minimax Regret as an evaluation criterion to evaluate alternatives. Alternatives Low Future Demand Moderate High Small Facility 52 42 43 Medium Facility 50 49 49 Large Facility -15 38 Alternatives Small Facility Medium Facility Large Facility Worst Regrets ? ? ? a) The worst regrets for alternative Small Facility is Blank 1 b) The worst regrets for alternative Medium Facility is Blank 2 c) The worst regrets for alternative Large Facility is Blank 3 d) The best course of action or decision by using Minimax Regret is to select Blank 4 facility 51arrow_forwardGiven is a decision payoff table and a Sub Decision Payoff Table. Use Minimax Regret as an evaluation criterion to evaluate alternatives. Alternatives Low Future Demand Moderate Small Facility 49 48 Medium Facility 46 47 Large Facility -12 112 47 Alternatives Small Facility Medium Facility Large Facility Worst Regrets ? ? ? a) The worst regrets for alternative Small Facility is Blank 1 b) The worst regrets for alternative Medium Facility is Blank 2 c) The worst regrets for alternative Large Facility is Blank 3 d) The best course of action or decision by using Minimax Regret is to select Blank 4 facility 47 ཆེ་ཆེ་བེ་རྡོ Higharrow_forward
- Q1: Based on the current situation develop a strategic plan for Rolling Plains Golf Club that may be implemented in 2021. Justify the rationale for your plan.arrow_forwardРОСО SHOT ON POCO F2 PRO mand levels have been determined to be 20% for low demand, 30% for medium demand, and 50% for high demand. DEMAND DEMAND IS DEMAND IS LOW MEDIUM IS HIGH 150 140 o 90 130 3D10 Ardmore, OK 85 110 Sweetwater, TX 90 100 Lake Charles, LA 110 120 (a) Which location would be selected based on the optimistic eriterion? Ardnore, ok pe (b) Which location would be selected based on the rnd pessimistic criterion? Lake auley is lowarrow_forwardGiven is a decision payoff table. Alternatives Small Facility Medium Facility Large Facility Low 26 18 -7 Future Demand Moderate 21 31 30 High 18 22 42 a) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMAX is to select Blank 1 facility b) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMIN is to select Blank 2 facility c) The best decision under uncertainty using LAPLACE/EQUALITY LIKELY is to select Blank 3 facility d) If the probabilities for Future Demand when it is Low-0.35, Moderate -0.30, and High-0.35, the expected monetary value (EMV) for the large facility-Blank 4.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning