
A cylindrical wire of radius R elongates when subjected to a tensile force F. Let L0 represent the initial length of the wire and let L1 represent the final length. Young’s modulus for the material is given by
Y=FL0πR2(L1−L0)
Assume that F = 800 ± 1 N, R = 0.75 ± 0.1 mm, L0 = 25.0 ± 0.1 mm, and L1 = 30.0 ± 0.1 mm.
- a. Estimate Y, and find the uncertainty in the estimate.
- b. Of the uncertainties in F, R, L0, and L1, only one has a non-negligible effect on the uncertainty in Y. Which one is it?
a.

Find the estimate of Young’s modulus of material.
Find the uncertainty in the Young’s modulus of material.
Answer to Problem 15E
The estimate of the Young’s modulus of material is Y=2,264±608Nmm2_.
The uncertainty in the Young’s modulus of material is σY=608Nmm2_.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The tensile force of cylindrical material is measured to be F=800±1 N, the radius is measured to be R=0.75±0.1 mm, initial length of the wire is measured to be L0=25.0±0.1 mm and the final length of the wire is measured to be L1=30.0±0.1 mm.
Calculation:
The form of the measurements of a process is,
Measured value(μ)± Standard deviation(σ).
Here, for a random sample the measured value will be sample mean and the population standard deviation will be sample standard deviation.
The form of the measurements of tensile force is F=800±1 N.
Here, the measured value of tensile force is F=800 N and the uncertainty in the tensile force is σF=1 N.
The form of the measurements of radius is R=0.75±0.1 mm.
Here, the measured value of radius is R=0.75mm and the uncertainty in radius is σR=0.1 mm.
The form of the measurements of initial length of the wire is L0=25.0±0.1 mm.
Here, the measured value of initial length is L0=25.0 mm and the uncertainty in initial length is σL0=0.1 mm.
The form of the measurements of final length of the wire is L1=30.0±0.1 mm.
Here, the measured value of final length is L1=30.0mm and the uncertainty in final length is σL1=0.1 mm.
Measured value of Young’s modulus of material:
The formula for Young’s modulus of material is Y=FL0πR2(L1−L0).
Here, F=800 N, R=0.75mm, L0=25.0 mm and L1=30.0mm.
The measured value of Young’s modulus of material is obtained as follows:
Y=FL0πR2(L1−L0)=800×253.14159×0.752×(30−25)=2,264
Thus, the measured value of Young’s modulus of material is Y=2,264Nmm2_.
Uncertainty:
The uncertainty of a process is determined by the standard deviation of the measurements. In other words it can be said that, measure of variability of a process is known as uncertainty of the process.
Therefore, it can be said that uncertainty is simply (σ).
Standard deviation:
The standard deviation is based on how much each observation deviates from a central point represented by the mean. In general, the greater the distances between the individual observations and the mean, the greater the variability of the data set.
The general formula for standard deviation is,
s=√∑xi2−(∑xi)2nn−1.
From the properties of uncertainties for functions of one measurement it is known that,
- If X1,X2,...,Xn are independent measurements with uncertainties σX1,σX2,...,σXn and if U=U(X1,X2,..,Xn) is a function of X1,X2,...,Xn then the uncertainty in the variable U is σU=√(∂U∂X1)2σ2X1+(∂U∂X2)2σ2X2+....+(∂U∂Xn)2σ2Xn.
Here, tensile force, radius, initial length and final length of the cylindrical wire are not constants. The Young’s modulus of material is a function of tensile force, radius, initial length and final length.
The uncertainty in the Young’s modulus of material is,
σY=FL0πR2(L1−L0)=√(∂Y∂F)2σ2F+(∂Y∂R)2σ2R+(∂Y∂L0)2σ2L0+(∂Y∂L1)2σ2L1=(√(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂F)2σ2F+(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂R)2σ2R+(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂L0)2σ2L0+(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂L1)2σ2L1)=(√(L0πR2(L1−L0))2×σ2F+(−2FL0πR3(L1−L0))2×σ2R+(FL1πR2(L1−L0))2×σ2L0+(−FL0πR2(L1−L0))2×σ2L1)=(√(2.82942)2×σ2F+(−6,036.1)2×σ2R+(543.249)2×σ2L0+(−452.707)2×σ2L1)
=(√(2.82942)2×(1)2+(−6,036.1)2×(0.1)2+(543.249)2×(0.1)2+(−452.707)2×(0.1)2)=608
Thus, the uncertainty in the Young’s modulus of material is σY=608Nmm2_.
Estimate of the Young’s modulus of material:
The estimate of the measurement of a process is,
Measured value(μ)± Standard deviation(σ).
Here, for a random sample the measured value will be sample mean and the population standard deviation will be sample standard deviation.
The estimate of Young’s modulus of material is,
Y=Measured value of Y±σY=,264±608Nmm2
Thus, the estimate of Young’s modulus of material is Y=2,264±608Nmm2_.
b.

Find the variable with non-negligible effect on the uncertainty in Y.
Answer to Problem 15E
The variable R has the non-negligible effect on the uncertainty in Y.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
From part (a), the uncertainty in the tensile force is σF=1 N, uncertainty in radius is σR=0.1 mm, uncertainty in initial length is σL0=0.1 mm and the uncertainty in final length is σL1=0.1 mm.
Uncertainty:
From the properties of uncertainties for functions of one measurement it is known that,
- If X1,X2,...,Xn are independent measurements with uncertainties σX1,σX2,...,σXn and if U=U(X1,X2,..,Xn) is a function of X1,X2,...,Xn then the uncertainty in the variable U is σU=√(∂U∂X1)2σ2X1+(∂U∂X2)2σ2X2+....+(∂U∂Xn)2σ2Xn.
Here, tensile force, radius, initial length and final length of the cylindrical wire are not constants. The Young’s modulus of material is a function of tensile force, radius, initial length and final length.
The uncertainty in the Young’s modulus of material is,
σY=FL0πR2(L1−L0)=√(∂Y∂F)2σ2F+(∂Y∂R)2σ2R+(∂Y∂L0)2σ2L0+(∂Y∂L1)2σ2L1=(√(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂F)2σ2F+(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂R)2σ2R+(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂L0)2σ2L0+(∂(FL0πR2(L1−L0))∂L1)2σ2L1)=(√(L0πR2(L1−L0))2×σ2F+(−2FL0πR3(L1−L0))2×σ2R+(FL1πR2(L1−L0))2×σ2L0+(−FL0πR2(L1−L0))2×σ2L1)=(√(2.82942)2×σ2F+(−6,036.1)2×σ2R+(543.249)2×σ2L0+(−452.707)2×σ2L1)
Uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in F:
Here, σF=0 N, σR=0.1 mm, σL0=0.1 mm and σL1=0.1 mm.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in F is,
σY=√(2.82942)2×σ2F+(−6,036.1)2×σ2R+(543.249)2×σ2L0+(−452.707)2×σ2L1=√(2.82942)2×(0)2+(−6,036.1)2×(0.1)2+(543.249)2×(0.1)2+(−452.707)2×(0.1)2=608
Thus, the uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in F is σY=608Nmm2_.
Uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in R:
Here, σF=1 N, σR=0 mm, σL0=0.1 mm and σL1=0.1 mm.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in R is,
σY=√(2.82942)2×σ2F+(−6,036.1)2×σ2R+(543.249)2×σ2L0+(−452.707)2×σ2L1=√(2.82942)2×(1)2+(−6,036.1)2×(0)2+(543.249)2×(0.1)2+(−452.707)2×(0.1)2=71
Thus, the uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in R is σY=71Nmm2_.
Uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L0:
Here, σF=1 N, σR=0.1 mm, σL0=0mm and σL1=0.1 mm.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L0 is,
σY=√(2.82942)2×σ2F+(−6,036.1)2×σ2R+(543.249)2×σ2L0+(−452.707)2×σ2L1=√(2.82942)2×(1)2+(−6,036.1)2×(0.1)2+(543.249)2×(0)2+(−452.707)2×(0.1)2=605
Thus, the uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L0 is σY=605Nmm2_.
Uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L1:
Here, σF=1 N, σR=0.1 mm, σL0=0.1 mm and σL1=0 mm.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L1 is,
σY=√(2.82942)2×σ2F+(−6,036.1)2×σ2R+(543.249)2×σ2L0+(−452.707)2×σ2L1=√(2.82942)2×(1)2+(−6,036.1)2×(0.1)2+(543.249)2×(0.1)2+(−452.707)2×(0)2=606
Thus, the uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L1 is σY=606Nmm2_.
Comparison:
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in F is σY=608Nmm2_.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in R is σY=71Nmm2_.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L0 is σY=605Nmm2_.
The uncertainty in Young’s modulus of material with negligible uncertainty in L1 is σY=606Nmm2_.
From part(a), the uncertainty in the Young’s modulus of material is σY=608Nmm2_.
By comparing all these uncertainties, the uncertainty in Y has drastic effect when the uncertainty in R is reduced to “0” and there is not much difference in the uncertainty in Y with the negligible uncertainty in F, L0 and L1.
That is, there is typical difference in the values of 71 and 608.
Therefore, the uncertainty in R is not negligible.
Thus, the variable R has the non-negligible effect on the uncertainty in Y.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
- 4 (MLE of ARCH) Suppose rt follows ARCH(2) with E(rt) = 0, rt = ut, ut = στει, σε where {+} is a sequence of independent and identically distributed (iid) standard normal random variables. With observations r₁,...,, write down the log-likelihood function for the model esti- mation.arrow_forward5 (Moments of GARCH) For the GARCH(2,2) model rt = 0.2+0.25u1+0.05u-2 +0.30% / -1 +0.20% -2, find cov(rt). 0.0035 ut, ut = στει,στ =arrow_forwardDefinition of null hypothesis from the textbook Definition of alternative hypothesis from the textbook Imagine this: you suspect your beloved Chicken McNugget is shrinking. Inflation is hitting everything else, so why not the humble nugget too, right? But your sibling thinks you’re just being dramatic—maybe you’re just extra hungry today. Determined to prove them wrong, you take matters (and nuggets) into your own hands. You march into McDonald’s, get two 20-piece boxes, and head home like a scientist on a mission. Now, before you start weighing each nugget like they’re precious gold nuggets, let’s talk hypotheses. The average weight of nuggets as mentioned on the box is 16 g each. Develop your null and alternative hypotheses separately. Next, you weigh each nugget with the precision of a jeweler and find they average out to 15.5 grams. You also conduct a statistical analysis, and the p-value turns out to be 0.01. Based on this information, answer the following questions. (Remember,…arrow_forward
- Business Discussarrow_forwardCape Fear Community Colle X ALEKS ALEKS - Dorothy Smith - Sec X www-awu.aleks.com/alekscgi/x/Isl.exe/10_u-IgNslkr7j8P3jH-IQ1w4xc5zw7yX8A9Q43nt5P1XWJWARE... Section 7.1,7.2,7.3 HW 三 Question 21 of 28 (1 point) | Question Attempt: 5 of Unlimited The proportion of phones that have more than 47 apps is 0.8783 Part: 1 / 2 Part 2 of 2 (b) Find the 70th The 70th percentile of the number of apps. Round the answer to two decimal places. percentile of the number of apps is Try again Skip Part Recheck Save 2025 Mcarrow_forwardHi, I need to sort out where I went wrong. So, please us the data attached and run four separate regressions, each using the Recruiters rating as the dependent variable and GMAT, Accept Rate, Salary, and Enrollment, respectively, as a single independent variable. Interpret this equation. Round your answers to four decimal places, if necessary. If your answer is negative number, enter "minus" sign. Equation for GMAT: Ŷ = _______ + _______ GMAT Equation for Accept Rate: Ŷ = _______ + _______ Accept Rate Equation for Salary: Ŷ = _______ + _______ Salary Equation for Enrollment: Ŷ = _______ + _______ Enrollmentarrow_forward
- Question 21 of 28 (1 point) | Question Attempt: 5 of Unlimited Dorothy ✔ ✓ 12 ✓ 13 ✓ 14 ✓ 15 ✓ 16 ✓ 17 ✓ 18 ✓ 19 ✓ 20 = 21 22 > How many apps? According to a website, the mean number of apps on a smartphone in the United States is 82. Assume the number of apps is normally distributed with mean 82 and standard deviation 30. Part 1 of 2 (a) What proportion of phones have more than 47 apps? Round the answer to four decimal places. The proportion of phones that have more than 47 apps is 0.8783 Part: 1/2 Try again kip Part ی E Recheck == == @ W D 80 F3 151 E R C レ Q FA 975 % T B F5 10 の 000 园 Save For Later Submit Assignment © 2025 McGraw Hill LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Y V& U H J N * 8 M I K O V F10 P = F11 F12 . darrow_forwardYou are provided with data that includes all 50 states of the United States. Your task is to draw a sample of: 20 States using Random Sampling (2 points: 1 for random number generation; 1 for random sample) 10 States using Systematic Sampling (4 points: 1 for random numbers generation; 1 for generating random sample different from the previous answer; 1 for correct K value calculation table; 1 for correct sample drawn by using systematic sampling) (For systematic sampling, do not use the original data directly. Instead, first randomize the data, and then use the randomized dataset to draw your sample. Furthermore, do not use the random list previously generated, instead, generate a new random sample for this part. For more details, please see the snapshot provided at the end.) You are provided with data that includes all 50 states of the United States. Your task is to draw a sample of: o 20 States using Random Sampling (2 points: 1 for random number generation; 1 for random sample) o…arrow_forwardCourse Home ✓ Do Homework - Practice Ques ✓ My Uploads | bartleby + mylab.pearson.com/Student/PlayerHomework.aspx?homeworkId=688589738&questionId=5&flushed=false&cid=8110079¢erwin=yes Online SP 2025 STA 2023-009 Yin = Homework: Practice Questions Exam 3 Question list * Question 3 * Question 4 ○ Question 5 K Concluir atualização: Ava Pearl 04/02/25 9:28 AM HW Score: 71.11%, 12.09 of 17 points ○ Points: 0 of 1 Save Listed in the accompanying table are weights (kg) of randomly selected U.S. Army male personnel measured in 1988 (from "ANSUR I 1988") and different weights (kg) of randomly selected U.S. Army male personnel measured in 2012 (from "ANSUR II 2012"). Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations. Do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b). Click the icon to view the ANSUR data. a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean weight of the 1988…arrow_forward
- solving problem 1arrow_forwardselect bmw stock. you can assume the price of the stockarrow_forwardThis problem is based on the fundamental option pricing formula for the continuous-time model developed in class, namely the value at time 0 of an option with maturity T and payoff F is given by: We consider the two options below: Fo= -rT = e Eq[F]. 1 A. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K = So. B. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K given by T K = T St dt. (Note that both options can have negative payoffs.) We use the continuous-time Black- Scholes model to price these options. Assume that the interest rate on the money market is r. (a) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option A. (Hint: use the martingale properties developed in the lectures for the stock price process in order to calculate the expectations.) (b) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option B. (c) Assuming the interest rate is very small (r ~0), use Taylor…arrow_forward
- Linear Algebra: A Modern IntroductionAlgebraISBN:9781285463247Author:David PoolePublisher:Cengage Learning
