Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9781107189638
Author: Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2.4, Problem 2.17P
To determine
The proof that
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The first four Hermite polynomials of the quantum oscillator areH0 = 1, H1 = 2x, H2 = 4x2 − 2, H3 = 8x3 − 12x.
Let p(x) = 12x3 − 8x2 − 12x + 7. Using the basis H = {H0, H1, H2, H3}, find the coordinate vector ofp relative to H. That is, find [p]H.
This is a textbook question, not a graded question
Could someone explain to me in detail why bringing a crystal substance to absolute zero isn't possible?
I know it's not because of quantum mechanics and uncertainty like some people say, because particals at their lowest zero-point will have a temperature of exactly 0 K, even though they're still experiencing motion.
From what I've gathered, the energy or time required to pull it off is infinite, but I can't find any equations or clear explanations as to why or how that is. And I also don't know if there's any other reasons beyond that.
If you could give me a thourough a breakdown for how absolute zero is impossible as you possibly could, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Take as much extra time as you need. As long as it's detailed and correct I'm happy. Though ideally I would before it come in before the end of the day.
For a system of bosons at room temperature, compute the average occupancy of a single-particle state and the probability of the state containing 0, 1, 2, or 3 bosons, if the energy of the state is 1 eV greater than μ
Chapter 2 Solutions
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Ch. 2.1 - Prob. 2.1PCh. 2.1 - Prob. 2.2PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.3PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.4PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.5PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.6PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.7PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.8PCh. 2.2 - Prob. 2.9PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.10P
Ch. 2.3 - Prob. 2.11PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.12PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.13PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.14PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.15PCh. 2.3 - Prob. 2.16PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.17PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.18PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.19PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.20PCh. 2.4 - Prob. 2.21PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.22PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.23PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.24PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.25PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.26PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.27PCh. 2.5 - Prob. 2.28PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.29PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.30PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.31PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.32PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.34PCh. 2.6 - Prob. 2.35PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.36PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.37PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.38PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.39PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.40PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.41PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.42PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.44PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.45PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.46PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.47PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.49PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.50PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.51PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.52PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.53PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.54PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.58PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.63PCh. 2 - Prob. 2.64P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- An electron having total energy E = 4.50 eV approaches a rectangular energy barrier with U = 5.00 eV and L = 950 pm as shown. Classically, the electron cannot pass through the barrier because E < U. Quantum- mechanically, however, the probability of tunneling is not zero. (a) Calculate this probability, which is the transmission coefficient. (b) To what value would the width L of the potential barrier have to be increased for the chance of an incident 4.50-eV electron tunneling through the barrier to be one in one million?arrow_forwardShow that the uncertainty in the momentum of a ground-state harmonic oscillator is (where h is h-bar, m is the mass, and k is the spring constant).arrow_forwardCan a quantum particle 'escape' from an infinite potential well like that in a box? Why? Why not?arrow_forward
- Describe the wave functions for the atom, and note how this necessitates the creation of new variables.arrow_forwardCan we simultaneously measure position and energy of a quantum oscillator? Why? Why not?arrow_forwardA free electron has a kinetic energy 13.3eV and is incident on a potential energy barrier of U =32.1eV and width w =0.091nm. What is the probability for the electron to penetrate this barrier (in %)? Check the correct answer and show all workarrow_forward
- Calculate the transmission coefficient for an electron of total energy 2eV incident upon a rectangular potential barrier of height 2 eV and width 10-9 marrow_forwardCalculate the transmission and reflection coefficients for an electron withkinetic energy 8 eV and potential energy 0 eV that moves into a regionwith potential energy of 5 eV.arrow_forwardThis question is for modern physics and wave and particle: (a) To how small a region must an electron be confined for borderline relativistic speeds – say, 0.05c – to become reasonably likely? (Ans: 3.9×10^−12m ) (b) On the basis of this, would you expect relativistic effects to be prominent for hydrogen’s electron, which has an orbit radius near 10-10? For a lead atom “inner-shell” electron of orbit radius 10-12m?arrow_forward
- Consider the notes that can be played on a piano. In what way is a piano anexample of a quantized system? In this analogy, would a violin be continuousor quantized?arrow_forwardFor a particle in a finite potential well, is it correct to say that each bound state of definite energy is also a state of definite wavelength? Is it a state of definite momentum? Explain.arrow_forwardShow transcribed data (d) Find (r) and (r2) for an electron in a circular orbit of hydrogen with arbitrary prin- cipal quantum number n (corresponds to l = n - 1 and any allowed m). (e) Compute the RMS uncertainty ✓(r) – (r)2 in terms of r for the electron in part (d). Note that the fractional spread in r decreases with increasing n (in this sense the system "begins to look classical” for large n). How much more volume does a hydrogen atom in the n = 100 state occupy compared to the hydrogen atom in the ground state. (Hint - you might want to look at Griffiths 4.55, or 4.15 in the second edition)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningModern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Classical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...
Physics
ISBN:9781337553292
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Modern Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781111794378
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. Moyer
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems
Physics
ISBN:9780534408961
Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. Marion
Publisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics Volume 3
Physics
ISBN:9781938168185
Author:William Moebs, Jeff Sanny
Publisher:OpenStax