Suppose that a male with a beak depth of 10 mm mated with a female with a beak depth of 8 mm. What would the expected beak depth of the offspring be? Would it matter if the female’s beak was 10 mm and the male’s 6 mm?
To determine: The expected beak depth of the offspring produced by the mating of males with beak depth of 10 mm and female with beak depth of 8 mm. The effect on the beak size of offspring if the female’s beak was 10 mm and male’s 6mm.
Introduction: The variety of processes can lead to evolutionary change in an organism. The English naturalist, Charles Darwin, proposed the Darwinian theory of biological evolution by natural selection, which is accepted by most of the evolutionary biologists.
Explanation of Solution
Darwin’s finches are an example of evolution by natural selection. Darwin observed that the species of the finches were closely related and similar to each other except for their beaks. Darwin also observed that the difference between the beak sizes had evolved the adaption of various species to use different food resources.
Some species of finches feed on small tender seeds, but due to depletion of these seeds, the birds resort to larger and hard seeds. The large seeds were consumed by the birds with shorter, more profound, and more powerful beaks and survived better, whereas when the plants bear an abundance of small seeds, the birds with long and shallow beaks survived better. The depth of the beaks of parents is similar to the offspring. The mean of parents' beak depth will be 9mm, so the beak depth of the offspring will be approximately 9mm.
The depth of the beak does not depend on the sex of the parent. However, some points scatter close to the line of regression, which suggests that sex of the parent does not affect the beak depth of the offspring.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 21 Solutions
BIOLOGY
- If self-fertilization causes lower fitness than cross-fertilization, under what environmental conditions would self-fertilization be the superior strategy?arrow_forwardWhy is it more difficult to determine the sex of a newlyhatched canary than a newborn puppy?arrow_forwardPeter Boag, studied the inheritance of beak depth in Galapagos finches by looking at the relationship between parent beak depth (in mm) and that of their offspring. He collected two sets of parent offspring data, once in 1976 and again in 1978. For both years he followed birds to determine which pairs belonged to which nests. Most of the parents had been previously captured so their beak depths were known. He then captured the offspring when they fledged and measured their beak depth. He calculated the "midparent" beak depth (the average beak depth of the two parents) and then compared that to beak depth of their offspring. Here is what he found in 1976: Assume that in 1978, all the finches with beak depths less than 9.0 mm died due to prolonged drought. Use your knowledge of how quantitative traits respond to selection and the following relationship, R = h2S, to determine the following: Selection differential. Predicted response…arrow_forward
- How do imprinting in geese and song development in sparrows differwith regard to the resulting behavior?arrow_forwardWith your knowledge of sexual selection theory, can you formulate a hypothesis that explains why female courtship might have evolved in this species? Is there anything about pipefish biology that might support your hypothesis?arrow_forwardWhat biological mechanisms account for the resemblance between offspring and their parents? Exmpain step by step in your own words.arrow_forward
- A naturalist is visiting an island in the middle of Lake Superior and observes a new bird species with three distinct types of beaks. Those with short crushing beaks (BB) feed on oak nuts; those with long delicate beaks (bb) pick the seeds from pine cones, and those with intermediate beaks (Bb) feed on both oak nuts and pine cones. (Note: because their beaks are structurally & functionally inadequate, few Bb offspring successfully reach adulthood). Let’s assume that this difference in beak morphology is the result of incomplete dominance in a single gene. In a year in which most of the food available on the island is in the form of hard oak nuts, which of the mated pairs below will produce the most offspring that will be able to survive to adulthood? Use Punnett squares to back up your answer. List all phenotypes and genotypes. Bb x Bb Bb x bb BB x Bb BB x bbarrow_forwardA naturalist is visiting an island in the middle of Lake Superior and observes a new bird species with three distinct types of beaks. Those with short crushing beaks (BB) feed on oak nuts; those with long delicate beaks (bb) pick the seeds from pine cones; and those with intermediate beaks (Bb) feed on both oak nuts and pine cones. (Note: because their beaks are structurally & functionally inadequate, few Bb offspring successfully reach adulthood). Let’s assume that this difference in beak morphology is the result of incomplete dominance in a single gene. In a year in which most of the food available on the island is in the form of hard oak nuts, which of the mated pairs below will produce the most offspring that will be able to survive to adulthood? Use Punnett squares to back up your answer. List all phenotypes and genotypes. a.) Bb x Bb b.) Bb x bb c.) BB x Bb d.) BB x bbarrow_forwardIn the eclectus parrot (Eclectus roratus), mothers sometimes take parental favoritism to extreme lengths by killing their sons, but never their daughters (Heinsohn et al. 2011). Sex-specific infanticide occurs more often at nests that can be flooded during the rainy season. Sons spend longer in the nest than daughters. Link this factor to why it might be adaptive for a parent parrot to kill a son in a vulnerable nest occupied by offspring of both sexes. Don't write from any online source..arrow_forward
- Biology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology (Mi...BiologyISBN:9781305117396Author:Cecie Starr, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage Learning