The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 20, Problem 4RE
Summary Introduction
Case summary: A person RS is working as a traveling salesperson for a person AW. The sales of RS constituted ninety-percent of RS work time. The person RS works 50 hours per week but was not paid for the extra hours. The new supervisor CB has claimed that the person RS has been inflating the sales call which is reported and should submit to a polygraph test. The personRS reported the polygraph test request to the U.S Department of labor which has prohibited the test. The person RS submitted a letter from his wife’s physician to the person AW which stated that she is ill and is in need of daily care. RS is taking leave of several months to take care of his wife. The person AW has sixty-three employees at the time. The person RS was terminated from his position as the position was merged with the adjacent territory.
To find:The reinstating of RS under key employee exception by AW.
Explanation:
A key employee is one who has major ownership or decision making role in the business. In the above case, RS is considered as a key employee as he constituted ninety percent of work time sale. According to FMLA, employees are allowed to take time off from work for family or medical reasons. FMLA provides unpaid leave of twelve weeks within a period of twelve-month. The wife of RS got injured after falling from a ladder and he took leave until December 2018 to take care of his wife. AW had eliminated RS from his position and combined his sales territory with an adjacent territory. Under FMLA act, the job of RS is not protected. Thus, the person AW can avoid reinstating the person RS.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Interactive Data Corp. hired Abdullah as an assistant product manager at a starting salary of $18,500. Over the next six years, Interactive steadily promoted Abdullah until he became Los Angeles branch manager at a salary of $56,116. Interactive’s officers repeatedly told Abdullah that he would have his job as long as his performance was adequate. In addition, Interactive distributed an employee handbook that specified “termination guidelines,” including a mandatory seven-step pre-termination procedure. Two years later, abdullah learned that his recently hired supervisor, Nargis, was under investigation by the FBI for embezzlement at his previous job. Abdullah reported this to Interactive officers. Shortly thereafter, Interactive fired Abdullah. He sued, claiming that Interactive could fire him only for good cause, after the seven-step procedure.
Valid contract Criteria : ( Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Legality, Capacity, Consent, Writing)
A). What possible information and…
Mark Young is the head of the painting department in a large hospital; 20 union employees report to him. Before coming on board at the hospital, he had worked as an independent contractor. At the hospital, he took a position that was newly created because the hospital believed change was needed in how painting services were provided.
Upon beginning his job, Mark did a 4-month analysis of the direct and indirect costs of painting services. His findings supported the perceptions of his administrators that painting services were inefficient and costly. As a result, Mark completely reorganized the department, designed a new scheduling procedure, and redefined the expected standards of performance.
Mark says that when he started out in his new job he was “all task,” like a drill sergeant who didn’t seek any input from his subordinates. From Mark’s point of view, the hospital environment did not leave much room for errors, so he needed to be strict about getting painters to do a good job…
Samantha is a nursing assistant in a retirement home run by Pinewood Home Care, Inc. She works at least 50 hours every week. After looking at her payroll stubs for the past six months, Samantha concludes that she has not received her share of overtime pay. With the help of a friend in the payroll department, Samantha learns that Pinewood has classified her as a temporary employee. No overtime pay is the result of that classification. Samantha complains to her supervisor, but her Pinewood makes no changes.
Is Samantha entitled to overtime as a nursing assistant? If not, why not? If Samantha is entitled to overtime, where is the most appropriate place to pursue legal options to recover her overtime and what steps should she take to do so
Response prompt (if appropriate): After posting, respond to two classmates. In each response, agree or disagree with the suggested conclusion and provide alternatives. Provide sources where appropriate.
Chapter 20 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Kofi and Ama are both colleagues in an organization working in the Finance and Marketing department respectively. Ama sent an email to Kofi indicating the annual budget for securing funds for sales and advertising campaign by the Marketing Unit.Kofi replied to the email stating that the budget provided by Ama cannot be met. Ama, declined to reply to the email and then started accusing Kofi in the midst of other workers the next day.Use the above scenario to answer the following questions: a) Identify and explain within the context of the above scenario the basic steps to effective communication which was adopted by Ama in communicating with Kofi.b) Do you think Ama is right for accusing Kofi for his reply? Justify your answerarrow_forwardBryan is a purchaser for Ace Widgets. Bryan’s brother-in-law is a salesperson for Niche Electronics, one of Ace’s largest suppliers. Bryan told his supervisor about the relationship, and she approved his ordering of supplies from his brother-in-law as long as the purchases were reviewed by a senior manager. Bryan did not receive any favor or money from his brother-in- law in return for the sales. A year after Bryan discussed the situation with his supervisor, Ace’s management discovers that another supplier offers the same parts as Niche Electronics but at cheaper prices. Ace Widgets is considering suing Bryan for conflict of interest. Which of the following is the most accurate statement about Ace’s chances of success? Choices: A. Ace’s chances are good because it could have gotten the supplies at a lower price. B. Ace’s chances are poor because Bryan did not actually receive any money from his brother-in-law for sending him business. C. Ace’s chances are poor because the company was…arrow_forwardMichelle Vinson was an employee of Meritor Savings Bank for approximately four years. Beginning as a tellertrainee, she ultimately advanced to the position of assistant branch manager. Her promotions were based solely upon merit. Sidney Taylor, a vice president of the bank and manager of the branch office in which Vinson worked, was Vinson’s supervisor throughout her employment with the bank. After the bank fired Vinson for her abusive use of sick leave, Vinson brought an action against Taylor and the bank, alleging that during her employment, she had “constantly been subjected to sexual harassment” by Taylor in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vinson stated that Taylor repeatedly demanded sexual favors from her, fondled her in front of other employees, and forcibly raped her on a number of occasions. Taylor and the bank categorically denied Vinson’s allegations. Does the conduct constitute sexual harassment? Explain.arrow_forward
- Will is an appraiser. He accepts compensation based on the value of the property he is appraising. In doing so, Will: violated FHA ethics standards violated USPAP ethics standards followed FHA ethics standards followed USPAP ethics standardsarrow_forwardAfter working as the manager of Piedmont Commons branch of Washington Mutual Bank (Washington), Dave Cummings was transferred to another branch. The new manager of Piedmont discovered $58,000 was missing from cash dispenser machines to which Cummings had had access. Bank investigators found security photos showing Cummings violating bank policy requiring two persons to be present when cash was handled. employees told them he had frequently violated the policy. The investigators asked him to take a polygraph test and he refused. Washington fired him telling him it was because he violated the policy. Cummings sued Washington alleging it had violated the EPPA. Had it? full-time sales associate for Kohl’s Department stores, inc., Pamela Manning worked predictable shifts starting no earlier than 9 a.m. and lasting no later than 7 p.m. Kohl’s carried out a nationwide staff restructuring which cut the hours for Manning’s department. she kept her hours by working in other departments as…arrow_forwardFollowing a decline in cigarette sales, L & M, Inc., hired J. Gfeller as vice president of sales and charged him to turn around the sales decline. After receiving an analysis of the ages of sales personnel and first-line management, Gfeller and his assistant, T. McMorrow, instituted an intensive program of personnel changes that led to the termination of many older managers and sales representatives. A top manager who sought to justify keeping an older manager was informed that he was “not getting the message.” Gfeller and McMorrow emphasized that they wanted young and aggressive people and that the older people were not able to conform or adapt to new procedures. R. E. Moran, who had been rated a first-rate division manager, was terminated and replaced by a 27-year-old employee. Gfeller and McMorrow made statements about employees with many years’ experience: “It was not 20 years’ experience, but rather 1 year’s experience 20 times.” The EEOC brought suit on behalf of the…arrow_forward
- Riggleman just graduated from college with his Master's in education and philosophy. Looking for his first job to help pay student loans, Riggleman applies for a teaching position at the Roanoke Roman Catholic Church's main high school. Riggleman, not a believer in God, doesn't care what subject he teaches, as long as it pays well. The hiring manager at the church school, Bob Balboa, tells Riggleman the church cannot hire Riggleman for the one open position as an assistant priest position that doubles as a teacher. In that position, the priest/teacher officiates at all of the school's religious ceremonies and also serves as a reduced load teacher (two classes instead of the usual five classes). Balboa tells Riggleman he cannot be considered for the opening because Riggleman is not Roman Catholic. Riggleman sues Balboa for discrimination under Title VII. What is the likely outcome? - Balboa wins because Riggleman does not have standing since he was never an employee Balboa wins because…arrow_forwardThe provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act that entitles employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for the birth of a child only applies to women. True or falsearrow_forwardJoan Leikvold was hired by Valley View Community Hospital as an operating room supervisor in 1972. She did not have a contract for a specific duration, nor was she told that the hospital would not discharge her except for cause. She was provided with a policy manual and told that the policies were to be followed in her employment relationship with the hospital. In 1978, she became the director of nursing. In October 1979, she requested a transfer back to her former position in the operating room. The chief executive officer (CEO) felt that it was inadvisable for someone who had been in a managerial position to take a subordinate position. Leikvold withdrew the transfer request but was subsequently fired. Her personnel record indicated “insubordination” as the reason for discharge. Leikvold was an at-will employee. At-will means that there is a contract made for an indefinite duration and either party, employer or employee, may terminate the contract at any time for any reason, or…arrow_forward
- You are a unionized registered nurse holding a license in good standing. Based on your regulatory body, the College of Nurses of Ontario and your employment contract, you are required to keep the license in good standing in order to practice. You are also responsible for disclosing any changes to the validity of your license to your employer. In February, you are in a car accident where you are charged with a drinking under the influence charge. Although you are not physically disabled by the accident, you advise your employer that you require support as you disclose you have a substance abuse issue (alcoholism is considered an addiction/disability). You have no previous infractions and have been a member of the College for over 15 years. You are not required to drive for your position and public transit is available for you to use. There has never been an issue/suspected issue with your alcoholism in the workplace. You receive notification that without warning, your College has…arrow_forwardAmy, a non-licensee, works in the leasing office of a large condo development. She is salaried. As part of her job, she finds tenants for open units. During a slow month, she starts offering current tenants a $30 gift card if they refer a friend who ends up renting a unit. Evaluate whether Amy is violating Chapter 475, F.S.arrow_forward) Jack was sued by Wowley for defamation, because of statements made by Jack in the public domain, which impugned wrongful, unethical behaviour by Wowley. Samla was subpoena to attend court as a witness, because she was present when Jack made the alleged defamatory statements. Jack as an incentive to Samla to attend court, promised to pay her the sum of $10,000 for her loss of time, but later on reneged on his promise, telling Samla to sue him because he is not giving her one cent. Samla thereafter sued Jack to enforce his promise, with a view to get the promised $10,000. Jack knows you are a Business law student and is seeking your advice on the matter. Please advise Jack.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education