Principles of Managerial Finance (14th Edition) (Pearson Series in Finance)
Principles of Managerial Finance (14th Edition) (Pearson Series in Finance)
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780133507690
Author: Lawrence J. Gitman, Chad J. Zutter
Publisher: PEARSON
bartleby

Videos

Textbook Question
Book Icon
Chapter 2, Problem 1IC

Integrative Case 1

Merit Enterprise Corp.

Sara Lehn, chief financial officer of Merit Enterprise Corp., was reviewing her presentation one last time before her upcoming meeting with the board of directors. Merit’s business had been brisk for the past 2 years, and the company’s CEO was pushing for a dramatic expansion of Merit’s production capacity. Executing the CEO’s plans would require $4 billion in new capital in addition to $2 billion in excess cash built up by the firm. Sara’s immediate task was to brief the board on options for raising the needed $4 billion.

Unlike most companies its size, Merit had maintained its status as a private company, financing its grow1h by reinvesting profits and, when necessary, borrowing from banks. Whether Merit could follow that same strategy to raise the $4 billion necessary to expand at the pace envisioned by the firm’s CEO was uncertain, although it seemed unlikely to Sara. She had identified the following two options for the board to consider.

Option 1: Merit could approach JPMorgan Chase, a bank that had served Merit well for many years with seasonal credit lines as well as medium-term loans. Lehn believed that JPMorgan was unlikely to make a $4 billion loan to Merit on its own, but it could probably gather a group of banks together to make a loan of this magnitude. However, the banks would undoubtedly demand that Merit limit further borrowing and provide JPMorgan with periodic financial disclosures so that it could monitor Merit’s financial condition as Merit expanded its operations.

Option 2: Merit could convert to public ownership, issuing stock to the public in the primary market. With Merit’s excellent financial performance in recent years, Sara thought that its stock could command a high price in the market and that many investors would want to participate in any stock offering that Merit conducted.

Becoming a public company would also allow Merit, for the first time, to offer employees compensation in the form of stock or stock options, thereby creating stronger incentives for employees to help the firm succeed. Sara also knew, however, that public companies faced extensive disclosure requirements and other regulations that Merit had never had to confront as a private firm. Furthermore, with stock trading in the secondary market, who knew what kind of individuals or institutions might wind up holding a large chunk of Merit stock?

To Do

  1. a. Discuss the pros and cons of option 1, and prioritize your thoughts. What are the most positive aspects of this option, and what are the biggest drawbacks?
  2. b. Do the same for option 2.
  3. c. Which option do you think Sara should recommend to the board, and why?
Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
QUESTION 1 Aria Jones has just been appointed as a Chief Financial Officer of Sweet Thing Bakery Ltd (Sweet Thing) in February 2020. Upon her appointment she was investigating the feasibility of an expansion project to the amount of R4 million. This expansion project will not only diversify the products Sweet Thing sells, but will also include the upgrade of outdated machinery, expansion of the workforce to help with job creation and the enlargement of the regions in which they sell. However, in March the Corona Virus placed all future plans on hold while the whole world was in lockdown. The Covid-19 pandemic has placed enormous strain on the South African economy resulting in a significant decrease in the interest rates and other costs of financing. Aria decided to re-evaluate Sweet Thing's Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) before considering any future expansion projects, as the cost of capital can be significantly affected due to the change in economic conditions that will…
Question 3 A venture capital fund is considering investing in a startup that is seeking to raise $1,500,000 in equity capital. The venture had previously raised $250,000 from angel investors and the founder had invested $50,000 of her savings in her venture. At the time this investment was under consideration, the company was projecting to be profitable three years from now. Net income in year three is projected to be $225,000. Because of projected losses in year one and two, cumulative retained earnings entering year three are projected to be negative $120,000. The venture capital firm will nbt invest unless the projected return on equity in year three is at least 30% If you were employed by the venture capital fund, based on this information alone, would you recommend that the $1,500,000 investment be made? Yes, the projected return on equity in year three is greater than 30% No, the projected return on equity in year three is less than 30%
Problem 6: A new CEO promises to increase company sales by 7% per year from its current level of $5,435,678 to a target level of $8 million. How long would it take for the new CEO to reach this goal?

Additional Business Textbook Solutions

Find more solutions based on key concepts
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Finance
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Financial Accounting: The Impact on Decision Make...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305654174
Author:Gary A. Porter, Curtis L. Norton
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
Accounting
ISBN:9780357233306
Author:Maloney
Publisher:Cengage
Financial leverage explained; Author: The Finance story teller;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GESzfA9odgE;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY