Microeconomics (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134737508
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 18.3.4PA
To determine
The reason for buying a resale rather than a new condo.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Use information from paragraph 4 to answer the following question.
Before the Progressive Era, many taxes had been based on property. But many wealthy people hid such property as stocks and bonds from the
govemment and did not pay taxes on them. Largely for this reason, progressives demanded that taxes be based on income rather than on property. In
1911, Wisconsin passed the first effective state income tax law. Two years later, Congress enacted what became the first permanent federal income tax in
the United States.
Which conclusion about taxation during the Progressive Era is best supported by the text?
O Progressives demanded that taxes be based on income rather than on property.
O Property taxes included ownership of stocks and bonds, which are inescapable today.
O Property taxes were an ineffective means for the government to collect the money it needed to operate.
O Progressives managed to pass the first state income tax, which was two years before the federal law was passed.
7
8…
Steve Forbes ran for U.S. president in 1996 and 2000 on a platform proposing a 17% flat tax, that is, an income tax that would simply be 17% of each tax payer's taxable income. Suppose that Alice was single in the year 2016 with a taxable income of $29,000.
If the 17% flat tax proposed by Mr. Forbes had been in effect in 2016, what would Alice's tax have been?
5. An article in the Financial Times noted that toll road that connects two counties in Massachusetts
was not generating as much toll revenue as predicted. At that time, the toll rate was $8 for a
passenger car making a round trip from end to end on the tollway during rush hour. What type
of additional information would you need to know in order to determine if the toll should be
increased or decreased to maximize revenue?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Microeconomics (7th Edition)
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.10PA
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.3PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.4PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.5RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.14PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.15PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- President Biden has proposed a $2.2 trillion Infrastructure package to repair roads and bridges. The exact source of the funds is unclear at the time of construction of this exam, but some policy analysts think that at least one part of the funding will be an increase in the federal excise tax on gasoline. Suppose the size of this increase in excise tax is written as t. Using a graph and equilibrium, analyze and explain the impact of this t dollars per gallon increase in excise tax on gasoline. Which of the curve(s), if any, would shift, and why? Graphically, show the new equilibrium price and quantity (labeling it P1 and Q1). At the new equilibrium, please determine how much of the tax increase was borne by gasoline consumers and how much was absorbed by gasoline sellers? Indicate the incidence of taxation for both consumers and sellers on the graph and explain. What will determine whether consumers or sellers will bear a higher relative burden of taxation? Please explain in detail.arrow_forwardWrite the summary of following paragraph. Tax Treaty A tax treaty is an agreement between two or more countries by dividing the right to impose a tax on income derived from a state sourced by a resident or resident of another country. The purpose of this tax treaty is to avoid the imposition of double taxation and various tax evasion efforts arising from transactions between the two countries. One of the tax treaties that will be discussed is the Indonesian tax treaty with Singapore which was signed on May 8, 1990. The avoidance of double taxation on the tax object is as follows: • Immovable property, income from immovable property under Indonesian- Singapore tax treaty is taxable only from the country in which the immovable property is situated even though the owner of the immovable object is not a national of that State. • The operating profit earned by a business entity in a country under this agreement may only be imposed by the country of which the enterprise is domiciled, but…arrow_forwarda) Under which circumstances does the tax burden fall entirely on consumers? Briefly explain.arrow_forward
- During the Trump Presidency the administration sought to reduce the research budget of many federal agencies including the National Institutes of Health. Bloomberg reported: President Donald Trump is proposing big cuts to biomedical research as part of a budget to reduce discretionary spending at the Department of Health and Human Services by 23 percent -- a move likely to provoke outcry from lawmakers, research groups, drugmakers and patients. The proposal would cut the budget of the National Institutes of Health -- which conduct and fund medical research by $5.8 billion, or about 18 percent from 2017 levels. The Office of Management and Budget called the change "a major reorganization of NIH's institutes and centers to help focus resources on the highest priority research and training activities." "We believe that this cut is dead on arrival on Capitol Hill," said Spencer Perlman, an analyst at Veda Partners. Democrats and Republicans have in the past supported the research agency…arrow_forwardThe October 10, 2013 issue of the Wall Street Journal contained an article entitled, , by Melissa Corn. The article asserts that: A dozen or so colleges actually are cutting their tuition in order to stimulate enrollment. At the same time, the same institutions are diminishing their tuition “discounting”---the practice of giving back to selected students generous hunks of their tuition in the form of financial aid. When colleges do discount their tuition prices, the actual, effective tuition price that many students pay is less than the “sticker” tuition price that the colleges publish. Knowing these facts, please answer the following questions: What must be true about the price elasticity of demand of students for college attendance in order for (a) not only to increase enrollment, but also increase tuition revenue? Explain why What if lots of other colleges join the parade and do the same thing? Provide a written and graphic analysis. What are these colleges assuming about the…arrow_forward5. Briefly explain why the following statements are either TRUE or FALSE: a. Behavioral economists question the assumption that individuals maximize utility. b. All economists agree that if most people in Sweden chose the default fund for the investment of their social security funds, it must have been the best fund. c. If preferences are shaped by society and are not "given," this will have repercussions for economists' theories of choice.arrow_forward
- In 1989, Senator Bob Packwood asked Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation how much extra revenue the government would raise if it just started taxing 100% of all income over $200,000 per year. The Joint Committee crunched some numbers and reported an answer: $204 billion per year. a. What is wrong with this answer? In 1989, very few people made over $200,000 a year, so the estimate of the tax revenue is far too high. Increasing government spending by $204 billion each year would have generated economic growth, and subsequently even higher amounts of tax revenues. The Joint Committee on Taxation did not have the tools needed to make such an estimate accurately. No one would have an incentive to work once they had earned $200,000, so much of the taxable income would disappear.arrow_forwardMark can work up to 80 hours each week at a pre-tax hourly wage of $20 but faces a constant 20 percent tax on his earnings. Thus, Mark maximizes his utility by choosing to work 50 hours per week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 per week and anyone can supplement their income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, tax on earnings will be increased to 50 percent. On a single graph, draw Mark's original budget line and his budget line under the negative income tax. Show that Mark will work fewer hours if the negative income tax is implemented Will Mark's utility be greater under the negative income tax? Discuss your answer.arrow_forwardJane has 9 liters of soft drinks and 11 sandwiches. Bob, on the other hand, has 11 liters of soft drinks and 9 sandwiches. At these endowments, Jane's MRSds of soft drinks for sandwiches is 0.8 and Bob's MRSds is 2.3. a) Illustrate the situation in the E-box. Which of the following graphs represents the situation correctly? [Select] 11 sandwiches 0₂ sandwiches 0₁ Graph a Graph b 11 0₁ soft drinks 0₁ soft drinks b) Is this allocation efficient? [Select] c) If allocation is not efficient, what changes will make both consumers better off? [Select] For question (a), choose one answer from "graph a" and "graph b" For question (b), choose one answer from "yes" and "no" For question (c), choose one answer from "Jane should trade some of her soft drinks for Bob's sandwiches","Jane should trade some of her sandwiches for Bob's soft drink" and "It is already efficient" 11arrow_forward
- Question In this hypothetical economy, there are two consumers living over two periods of life. Ann's incomes are $50,000 in both periods. Meanwhile, Bob earns nothing in the first period but $105,000 in the second period. Both of them can borrow or lend at the interest rate r. For simplicity, assume that there are no taxes. a) $50,000 in the first period and $50,000 in the second period. Write down the lifetime budget Assume that both Ann and Bob consume constraint for each consumer then calculate the interest rate r. Describe the economic behaviour of each consumer. b) Suppose the interest rate increases. What will happen to Ann's consumption in the first period? Is Ann better off or worse off than before the interest rate rises? Explain your answer using an appropriate diagram c) What will happen to Bob's consumption in the first period when the interest rate increases? Is Bob better off or worse off than before the interest rate increases? Explain your answer using an appropriate…arrow_forwardSuppose Marcus eats nothing but burritos for dinner. He buys 30 burritos each month. During the last couple of weeks, Marcus noticed a decrease in the price of burritos. The price of burritos fell from $6.00 per burrito last month to $5.75 per burrito this month. Assume that Marcus has a fixed income of $180 that he can spend on burritos. How many burritos can Marcus afford to buy at the new price of $5.75?arrow_forwardAccording to the textbook, which of the following statements about taxes in the U.S. is (are) correct? (x) Tax evasion is illegal, but tax avoidance is legal. (y) Most economists believe that a corporate income tax affects the stockholders of a corporation but not its employees or customers. (z) In practice, the U.S. income tax system is filled with special provisions that alter a family's tax based on its specific circumstances. A. (x), (y) and (z) B. (x) and (y) only C. (x) and (z) only D. (y) and (z) only E. (z) onlyarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning