Microeconomics (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134737508
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 18.4.11PA
To determine
Effect of government policy on reducing the income inequality.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In 1999, 4,860 TANF recipients were asked how many hours they worked in the previous week. In 2000, 4,392 of these recipients were again subject to the same TANF rules and were again asked their hours of work during the previous week. The remaining 468 individuals were randomly assigned to a “Negative Income Tax” (NIT) experiment that gave out financial incentives for welfare recipients to work and subjected them to its rules. Like the other group, they were asked about their hours of work during the previous week. The data from the experiment are contained in the table below.(attached)a. What effect did the NIT experiment have on the employment rate of public assistance recipients? Develop a standard difference-in-differences table to support your answer.b. What effect did the NIT experiment have on the weekly hours worked of public assistance recipients who worked positive hours during the survey week? Develop a standard difference-in-differences table to support your answer.
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Calculate the share of total income each quintile of this income distribution received. Do the top and bottom quintiles in this distribution have a greater or larger share of total income than the top and bottom quintiles of the U.S. income distribution for 2005?
The following table gives the distribution of the income of the employees of a company
Calculate the cumulative percentage of 2000 income.
Calculate the Gini coefficient
Chapter 18 Solutions
Microeconomics (7th Edition)
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1.10PA
Ch. 18 - Prob. 18.1.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.2.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.3PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.4PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.5PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.3.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.1RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.2RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.3RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.4RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.5RQCh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.6PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.7PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.8PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.9PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.10PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.11PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.12PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.13PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.14PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.4.15PACh. 18 - Prob. 18.1CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The table shows the distribution of personal income in the United States in 2016. Percentage of total income Households Poorest 20 percent 3.1 Second 20 percent Third 20 percent Fourth 20 percent Richest 20 percent 8.2 14.3 23.2 51.2 For all U.S. households to receive an equal share of income, what percentage of total income would the poorest 20 percent of households have to receive from higher-income groups? What percentage would the second poorest have to receive? >>> Answer to 1 decimal place. The poorest 20 percent of households would have to receive percent. The second poorest 20 percent of households have to receive percent.arrow_forwardQuestion 20 - A group of eight people have the following annual incomes: $10,000; $9,000: $15,700; $5,000; $6,500; $13,500; S12,000; and $8,300. Calculate the share of total income that people in the fourth quartile receive from this incorne distribution. Enter your answer in the box below rounding to one decimal place. Answerarrow_forwardIn an economy, over the last decade, each of the top five decile groups has experienced a fall in their share of total income. In contrast, the bottom five decile groups have experienced a substantial increase in their share of total income. It can be concluded that, over this period, the distribution of income is most likely to have become A more equal B more equal but less equitable C more equitable D more equitable but less equalarrow_forward
- A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $24,000, $18,000, $50,000, $100,000, $12,000, $36,000, $80,000, $10,000, $24,000, $16,000. Calculate the share of total income that each quintile receives from this income distribution. Do the top and bottom quintiles in this distribution have a greater or larger share of total income than the top and bottom quintiles of the U.S. income distribution?arrow_forward39. In this exercise we estimate the rate at which the total per- sonal income is rising in the Richmond-Petersburg, Virginia, metropolitan area. In 1999, the population of this area was 961,400, and the population was increasing at roughly 9200 people per year. The average annual income was $30,593 per capita, and this average was increasing at about $1400 per year (a little above the national average of about $1225 yearly). Use the Product Rule and these figures to estimate the rate at which total personal income was rising in the Richmond-Petersburg area in 1999. Explain the meaning of each term in the Product Rule.arrow_forwardSuppose the bottom 50 percent of a population (in terms of earnings) all receive an equal share of p percent of the nation’s income, where 0 ≤ p ≤ 50. The top 50 percent of the population all receive an equal share of 1 − p percent of the nations income. Calculate the Gini coefficient as an expression of parrow_forward
- Describe how to calculate a Gini coefficient.arrow_forwardDue to a stagnant income for 23 years, the number of Mexicans who cannot buy the basic basket has been practically the same since 1992. According to data from the National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (Coneval), in 2014, the 53.2 percent of the population had income below the welfare line, and a monthly per capita income of 3,115 pesos. In 1992, when poverty began to be measured in Mexico, it was 53.1 percent of the population, with an average income of 3,322 pesos. The basic product consumption basket is a necessary element to calculate inflation through the (INPC / GDP deflator / interest rate) _______________________________arrow_forwardConsider the following table with individuals in a country and their incomes: Individuals Income 1 15 30 4 45 55 6 70 7 85 8. 100 115 10 130 Total 650 O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 3.5. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 7.3. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 4.3. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 6.5.arrow_forward
- Part A: You are giving a talk on a new concept, economic insecurity. Askeptical audience member says that economists have been studying poverty for years and thus, economic insecurity is not a new concept. Provide a rebuttal as to why this is an incorrect statement (that poverty and insecurity are not necessarily the same). Secondly, identify two ways we can measure economic insecurity. Part B: Examining the relationship between income and well-being inany given year tends to suggest there is a positive relationship between the two variables. However, when examining well-being and income over a long-run period, there appears to be no relationship between these outcomes. Comment on this phenomenon and provide a possible reason for this finding given prospect theory.arrow_forwardQuestion 9 In Country X there are only two income levels: $10,000 and $40,000. Twenty million individuals earn the low income and twenty million earn the high income. The Gini coefficient associated with this income distribution is given by 0.70 0.30 0.35 0.65arrow_forwardIn the United States, the richest quintile of the population receives 13 times as much income as the poorest quintile. However, the richest quintile only spends 4 times as much as the poorest quintile. Identify the possible reason or reasons for this stark difference between income inequality and consumption inequality. The poverty line does not reflect relative poverty. Intergenerational mobility allows children to consume more than their parents. The richest quintile has the ability to save a larger percentage of its income. Individuals experiencing temporary fluctuations in their incomes are more likely to maintain moderate spending habits.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781285165875
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning