Microeconomics (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134737508
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 15.5.10PA
To determine
Merger Concentration.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The following table lists the market shares of the eight firms in an industry. Market Shares of Eight Firms in an Industry
Firm
Market Share
1
3333
2
2828
3
1515
4
88
5
55
6
55
7
44
8
22
Calculate the four-firm concentration ratio for this industry. Enter your answer in the box below, and round to the nearest whole number if necessary.
After reading the section titled “Dominant Microprocessor Company Intel Adapts to Next Trend” (Chapter 11 pg. 384-385) and the article titled “2018-2019 Intel Corporate Responsibility Report: Creating Value through Transparency,” complete a researched list of (4-5) reasons how Intel becomes and maintains itself as a dominate firm (monopoly). List (3) reasons why Apple would depart from a dominant corporation like Intel. You must include an introduction that explains the course theory regarding monopolies - dominant firms. Although this assignment allows you to create a list, you must follow the APA style of writing and include research to support your list and place this information in your reference section.
Use the following table to calculate the Herfindal-Hirshman Index for the U.S. auto market. Would the FTC approve a merger between Gm and Ford? Explain your response. The table is......... GM 19% Ford 17% Toyota 14% Chrysler 11%
Chapter 15 Solutions
Microeconomics (7th Edition)
Ch. 15 - Prob. 15.1.1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.1.2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.1.3PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.1.4PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.1.5PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.1.6PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.3RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.4RQ
Ch. 15 - Prob. 15.2.5PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.6PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.7PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.8PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.9PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.10PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.11PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.12PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.2.13PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.3RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.4PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.5PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.6PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.7PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.8PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.9PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.3.10PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.3PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.4PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.5PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.6PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.4.7PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.1RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.2RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.3RQCh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.4PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.5PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.6PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.7PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.8PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.9PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.10PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.11PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.12PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.5.13PACh. 15 - Prob. 15.1CTECh. 15 - Prob. 15.2CTECh. 15 - Prob. 15.3CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Is it true that a merger between two films that are not already in the top four by size can affect both the four-firm concentration ratio and the Herfindahl-Hirshmau Index? Explain briefly.arrow_forward35. Use Table 11.5 to calculate the four-firm concentration ratio for the U.S. auto market. Does this indicate a concentrated market or not? GM 19% Ford 17% Toyota 14% Chrysler 11% Table 11.5 Global Auto Manufacturers with Top Four U.S. Market Share, June 2013 (Source: http://www.zacks.com/commentary/27690/auto- industry-stock-outlook-june-2013)arrow_forwardThe table shows the total revenue of the 50 firms in the roofing industry. Total revenue Calculate the four-firm concentration ratio and the HHI. Firm (dollars) >>> Answer to 2 decimal places. Roofmart 740 Shingles R Us Weather Guard 400 What is the market structure of the roofing industry? 300 Dry on Top Next 10 firms (each) Next 16 firms (each) 100 The four-firm concentration ratio equals 90 60 The HHI equals Next 20 firms (each) 50 The four-firm concentration ratio indicates that the market is Industry 4,400 and the - (Assume there are no reasons that would make the concentration measures unreliable Herfindahl-Hirschman Index indicates that the market is guides.) O A. a monopoly; a monopoly O B. monopolistic competition; monopolistic competition OC. probably not monopolistic competition; monopolistic competition D. mononolistic competition: a mononolvarrow_forward
- The following table lists the market shares of the eight firms in an industry. Market Shares of Eight Firms in an Industry Market Share Firm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 60 15 10 8 3 2 1 1 Calculate the four-firm concentration ratio for this industry. Enter your answer in the box below, and round to the nearest whole number if necessary.arrow_forwardStep 1 of 2: Use the following table with the sample data to calculate the four-firm concentration ratio for the U.S. auto market. Round your answer to the nearest whole number if necessary. Market Shares in the U.S. Auto Market GM 18%18% Ford 16%16% Toyota 14%14% Chrysler 10%arrow_forwardPRICE (Dollars per can) 2.00 1.80 1.60 Demand 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0 0 MC = ATC MR 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) Monopoly Outcome $0.80 per can. Given this When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce 180 cans and charge information, each firm earns a daily profit of $144.00, so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is $288.00. Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit. Now, suppose that Stargell decides to break the collusion and increase its output by 50%, while Schmidt continues to produce the amount set under the collusive agreement. Stargell's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to now $ , while Schmidt's…arrow_forward
- I am intrigued by the following article detailing how Nestle agreed to pay Starbucks $7.2B to distribute and sell Starbucks’ packaged coffees and teas around the world. Why would Nestle purposely put its competitors’ brands right next to it in the store, and then pay them for the privilege? Why wouldn’t Starbucks just take care of distributing its own brands rather than go through Nestle? Please explain how this outcome could be profit maximizing for both firmsarrow_forwardOur textbook discusses two methods of regulating natural monopolies. One of them is price cap regulation. One of the following answers is an example of price cap regulation. Which one? Group of answer choices A government setting the price that a cable company can charge over a period of time by looking at the cable company's accounting costs and then adding a normal rate of profit. A government setting a price level for a public utility several years in advance. When a regulated public utility plays a large role in setting up the regulations that they will follow. When a firm no longer is considered a natural monopoly because of decreased demand.arrow_forwardPlace the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 2.00 Demand 1.80 Monopoly Outcome 1.60 1.40 MC = ATC 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 MR 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) PRICE (Dollars per can)arrow_forward
- 1.1 Read the following extract and answer question 1.1, 1.2. Evidence of domination Both the Competition Commission and Icasa found, in their inquiries, that Vodacom and MTN are dominant across the supply chain. Their dominance is even more entrenched by the spectrum-sharing deals that they have entered into with Cell C, Liquid Intelligent Technologies and Rain. Cell C is wholly reliant on MTN and Vodacom to provide mobile services, and Liquid and Rain are disincentivised from competing aggressively in the mobile market due to the lucrative deals they have struck to provide capacity to either Vodacom or MTN, or both. This has limited their ability to compete independently- leaving Telkom as the only entity in the position to be able to challenge the "cosy" market structure head-on. The economic argument being expressed in this extract is that of and has the consequence of a) Market failure, externalities. b) Government failure, public goods being under-produced. c) Market failure,…arrow_forwardCh09-07 S8 (19-23c) 2:05 Natural Monopolies BUS Ch9 v2 07 new Natural Monopolies 19. Natural monopolies occur as the result of the type of good they produce. Natural monopalies tend to produce goods that are highly capital intensive and have a verY high fixed cost. 20. Other factors leading to a natural monopoly include a scarce resource controlled solely by the firm, or the firm serves a market that is limited to specific geographical area. 21. Thus, the industries that tend toward a natural monopoly market structure requires firms to engage in larpe scale production to reach min mum ong Run average tota. cost. 22. Examples: Water and power companies, mining companies, and railroads 23. This brings us back to chapter 7 and our discussion of economies of scale. a) Increasing economies oi scale indicates that as scale of plant Increases, AC declines, b) Constant economies of scale indicates that as scale of plant increases, AC is constant. c) Decreasing economies of scale indicates that…arrow_forwardMerger of beer giants faces obstacles Mega-brand beers have lost market share to wine and craft beer. In response, Anheuser-Busch InBev and SABMiller, the two biggest brewers in the world, are discussing a merger that would be scrutinized by antitrust regulators. Source: The New York Times, September 16, 2015 How would a merger benefit the two big brewers? Under what circumstances would the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) challenge the merger? A merger would benefit the two big brewers because O A. the price of beer would fall close to the price in a perfectly competitive market and sales would increase O B. average total cost would increase but price would increase by more than average total cost O C. the price of beer could rise close to the monopoly price and economic profit would increase O D. many craft brewers would be forced out of the market The Federal Trade Commission would challenge the merger if O A. it increases the HHI O B. the HHI is less than 1,500 O C. the HHI is…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning