Principles Of Taxation For Business And Investment Planning 2020 Edition
23rd Edition
ISBN: 9781259969546
Author: Sally Jones, Shelley C. Rhoades-Catanach, Sandra R Callaghan
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 8AP
To determine
Compute Incorporation L’s apportionment factors, income apportioned to each state, and state tax liability.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Cromwell Corporation does business in two states, A and B. State A uses an equal-weighted, three-factor apportionment formula and
has a 5 percent state tax rate. State B uses an apportionment formula that double-weights the sales factor and has a 6 percent state
tax rate. Cromwell's state-level taxable income, before apportionment, is $3.5 million. It has identified the following components of its
sales, payroll, and property factors:
Sales
Payroll
Average property
Required:
State A
$ 7,500,000
3,500,000
2,500,000
State B
$ 4,750,000
2,700,000
1,550,000
Total
$ 12,250,000
6,200,000
4,050,000
a. Calculate Cromwell's apportionment factors, income apportioned to each state, and state tax liability.
b. State B is considering changing its apportionment formula to place 100 percent of the weight on the sales factor, ignoring payroll
and property for apportionment purposes. Given its current levels of activity, what would Cromwell's state tax liability be for each
state?
Answer is not…
Herger Corporation does business in California, Nevada, and Oregon and has income tax nexus in these states as well. Herger's California state tax base was $939,500 after making the required federal/state adjustments. Herger's federal tax return contains the following items:
Item
Amount
Federal T-note interest income
$ 4,700
Nevada municipal bond interest income
$ 4,040
California municipal bond interest income
$ 6,400
Interest expense related to T-note interest income
$ 1,710
Royalty income
$ 112,000
Travel expenses
$ 9,300
Determine Herger's business income.
Beckett Corporation has nexus with States A and B. Apportionable income for the year totals $1,190,000 . Beckett's apportionment factors for the year use the following data. Compute Beckett's B taxable income for the year; B uses a three-factor apportionment formula with a double-weighted sales factor. State AState BTotalSales$1,428,000$856,800$2,284,800Property$238,000$0 $238,000Payroll$357,000$0 $357,000
Chapter 13 Solutions
Principles Of Taxation For Business And Investment Planning 2020 Edition
Ch. 13 - Why does a corporations state income tax cost...Ch. 13 - Prob. 2QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 3QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 4QPDCh. 13 - Borden Inc. conducts a business that spans four...Ch. 13 - Prob. 6QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 7QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 8QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 9QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 10QPD
Ch. 13 - Prob. 11QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 12QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 13QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 14QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 15QPDCh. 13 - Prob. 16QPDCh. 13 - This year, Mesa Inc.s before-tax income was...Ch. 13 - Prob. 2APCh. 13 - Prob. 3APCh. 13 - Prob. 4APCh. 13 - Prob. 5APCh. 13 - Prob. 6APCh. 13 - Prob. 7APCh. 13 - Prob. 8APCh. 13 - Prob. 9APCh. 13 - Prob. 10APCh. 13 - Prob. 11APCh. 13 - Prob. 12APCh. 13 - Prob. 13APCh. 13 - Prob. 14APCh. 13 - Prob. 15APCh. 13 - Prob. 16APCh. 13 - Prob. 17APCh. 13 - Prob. 18APCh. 13 - Prob. 19APCh. 13 - Prob. 20APCh. 13 - Prob. 21APCh. 13 - Prob. 22APCh. 13 - Prob. 23APCh. 13 - Prob. 24APCh. 13 - Prob. 25APCh. 13 - Prob. 26APCh. 13 - Prob. 27APCh. 13 - Prob. 28APCh. 13 - Prob. 29APCh. 13 - Prob. 30APCh. 13 - Prob. 31APCh. 13 - Prob. 32APCh. 13 - Prob. 33APCh. 13 - Prob. 34APCh. 13 - Prob. 35APCh. 13 - Prob. 36APCh. 13 - Prob. 37APCh. 13 - State E wants to encourage the development of a...Ch. 13 - Prob. 2IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 3IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 4IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 5IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 6IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 7IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 8IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 9IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 10IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 11IRPCh. 13 - Prob. 2RPCh. 13 - Prob. 3RPCh. 13 - Prob. 1TPCCh. 13 - Prob. 2TPCCh. 13 - Prob. 3TPCCh. 13 - Prob. 1CPCh. 13 - Prob. 2CP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Cromwell Corporation does business in two states, A and B. State A uses an equal-weighted, three-factor apportionment formula and has a 5 percent state tax rate. State B uses an apportionment formula that double-weights the sales factor and has a 6 percent state tax rate. Cromwell's state-level taxable income, before apportionment, is $2 million. It has identified the following components of its sales, payroll, and property factors: Sales Payroll Average property State A $ 6,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Required A Required B Required: a. Calculate Cromwell's apportionment factors, income apportioned to each state, and state tax liability. b. State B is considering changing its apportionment formula to place 100 percent of the weight on the sales factor, ignoring payroll and property for apportionment purposes. Given its current levels of activity, what would Cromwell's state tax liability be for each state? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Apportionment…arrow_forwardOldham Incorporated conducts business in State M and State N, which both use the UDITPA three-factor formula to apportion income State M's corporate tax rate is 4.5 percent, and State N's corporate tax rate is 7 percent. This year, Oldham had the following sales, payroll, and property (in thousands of dollars) in each state: Gross receipts from sales Payroll expense Property costs State M 3,000 800 900 State N $ 7,500 1,200 1,000 Total $ 10,500 2,000 1,900 Required: Oldham's before-tax income was $3 million. Compute Oldham's State M and State N tax if State N uses an apportionment formula in which the sales factor is double-weighted. (Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places, e.g., 47.15% would be 0.4715. Enter "Apportionment percentage" and "Tax rate" in decimals and not in percentage. Do not round any intermediate values. Enter your answers in dollars and not in millions or thousands of dollars.)arrow_forwardHerger Corporation does business in California, Nevada, and Oregon, and has nexus in these states as well. Herger’s California state tax base was $943,500 after making the required federal/state adjustments. Herger’s federal tax return contains the following items: Item $ Federal T-note interest income 5,900 Nevada municipal bond interest income 3,690 California municipal bond interest income 5,500 Interest expense related to T-note interest income 1,540 Royalty income 181,000 Travel expenses 10,100 Determine Herger’s California business income.arrow_forward
- Ashton Corporation is headquartered in Pennsylvania and has a state income tax base there of $550.000. Of this amount, $89.000 was nonbusiness income. Ashton's Pennsylvania apportionment factor is 41.70 percent. The nonbusiness income allocated to Pennsylvania was $47,500. Assuming a Pennsylvania corporate tax rate of 8.25 percent, what is Ashton's Pennsylvania state tax liability? Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount. State tax liability → $ 19,860arrow_forwardOldham Incorporated conducts business in State M and State N, which both use the UDITPA three-factor formula to apportion income. State M's corporate tax rate is 4.5 percent, and State N's corporate tax rate is 7 percent. This year, Oldham had the following sales, payroll, and property (in thousands of dollars) in each state: Gross receipts from sales Payroll expense Property costs State M $ 3,000 800 900 State N $ 7,500 1,200 1,000 Total $ 10,500 2,000 1,900 Required: If Oldham's before-tax income was $3 million, compute its State M and State N tax. (Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places, e.g., 47.15% would be 0.4715. Enter "Apportionment percentage" and "Tax rate" in decimals and not in percentage. Do not round any intermediate values. Enter your answers in dollars and not in millions or thousands of dollars.)arrow_forwardAshton Corporation is headquartered in Pennsylvania and has a state income tax base there of $543,000. Of this amount, $63,000 was nonbusiness income. Ashton's Pennsylvania apportionment factor is 42.35 percent. The nonbusiness income allocated to Pennsylvania was $28,250. Assuming a Pennsylvania corporate tax rate of 8.25 percent, what is Ashton's Pennsylvania state tax liability?arrow_forward
- Company K operates in a jurisdiction that levies an income tax with the following rate structure: Percentage Rate Bracket Income from -0- to $75,000 Income from $75,001 to $150,000 Income in excess of $150,000 Company K incurs a $35,000 deductible expense. Required: a. Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K's taxable income before considering the additional deduction is $71,600. b. Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K's taxable income before considering the additional deduction is $178,000. c. Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K has a $7,250 loss before considering the additional deduction. 7% 10 15 Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Required C Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K's taxable income before additional deduction is $71,600. Tax savingsarrow_forwardFirm E must choose between two alternative transactions. Transaction 1 requires a $9,150 cash outlay that would be nondeductible in the computation of taxable income. Transaction 2 requires a $14,800 cash outlay that would be a deductible expense. Required: a. Determine the after-tax cost for each transaction. Assume Firm E's marginal tax rate is 25 percent. b. Determine the after-tax cost for each transaction. Assume Firm E's marginal tax rate is 45 percent.arrow_forwardJurisdiction B levies a flat 7 percent tax on the first $5 million of annual corporate income. Required: Jersey Incorporated generated $2.7 million income this year. Compute Jersey’s income tax and determine its average and marginal tax rate on total income. Leray Incorporated generated $7.4 million income this year. Compute Leray’s income tax and determine Leray’s average and marginal tax rate on total income. What type of rate structure does Jurisdiction B use for its corporate income tax?arrow_forward
- What amount is payable to a state tax board if the original sales price is $3,000, and the tax rate is 3.5%?arrow_forwardCompany N will receive $55,000 of taxable revenue from a client. Use Appendix A and Appendix B. Required: Compute the NPV of the $55,000 assuming that Company N will receive $27,500 now (year 0) and $27,500 in year 1. The company’s marginal tax rate is 30 percent, and it uses a 6 percent discount rate. Compute the NPV of the $55,000 assuming that Company N will receive $27,500 in year 1 and $27,500 in year 2. The company’s marginal tax rate is 40 percent, and it uses a 4 percent discount rate. Compute the NPV of the $55,000 assuming that Company N will receive $11,000 now (year 0) and $11,000 in years 1, 2, 3, and 4. The company’s marginal tax rate is 10 percent, and it uses a 9 percent discount rate.arrow_forwardOn its year 1 financial statements, Seatax Corporation, an accrual-method taxpayer, reported federal income tax expense of $570,000. On its year 1 tax return, it reported a tax liability of $650,000. During year 1, Seatax made estimated tax payments of $700,000. What book-tax difference, if any, associated with its federal income tax expense should Seatax have reported when computing its year 1 taxable income? Is the difference favorable or unfavorable? Is it temporary or permanent? Year 1 Book-tax Difference Favorable or Unfavorable Temporary or Permanentarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Accounting Volume 1AccountingISBN:9781947172685Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172685
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College