Herger Corporation does business in California, Nevada, and Oregon, and has nexus in these states as well. Herger’s California state tax base was $943,500 after making the required federal/state adjustments. Herger’s federal tax return contains the following items: Item $ Federal T-note interest income 5,900 Nevada municipal bond interest income 3,690 California municipal bond interest income 5,500 Interest expense related to T-note interest income 1,540 Royalty income 181,000 Travel expenses 10,100 Determine Herger’s California business income.

Herger Corporation does business in California, Nevada, and Oregon, and has nexus in these states as well. Herger’s California state tax base was $943,500 after making the required federal/state adjustments. Herger’s federal tax return contains the following items: Item $ Federal T-note interest income 5,900 Nevada municipal bond interest income 3,690 California municipal bond interest income 5,500 Interest expense related to T-note interest income 1,540 Royalty income 181,000 Travel expenses 10,100 Determine Herger’s California business income.

SWFT Essntl Tax Individ/Bus Entities 2020

23rd Edition

ISBN:9780357391266

Author:Nellen

Publisher:Nellen

Chapter3: Taxes On The Financial Statements

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 26P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Oldham Incorporated conducts business in State M and State N, which both use the UDITPA three-factor formula to apportion income. State M's corporate tax rate is 4.5 percent, and State N's corporate tax rate is 7 percent. This year, Oldham had the following sales, payroll, and property (in thousands of dollars) in each state: Gross receipts from sales Payroll expense Property costs State M $ 3,000 800 900 State N $ 7,500 1,200 1,000 Total $ 10,500 2,000 1,900 Required: If Oldham's before-tax income was $3 million, compute its State M and State N tax. (Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places, e.g., 47.15% would be 0.4715. Enter "Apportionment percentage" and "Tax rate" in decimals and not in percentage. Do not round any intermediate values. Enter your answers in dollars and not in millions or thousands of dollars.)
Oldham Incorporated conducts business in State M and State N, which both use the UDITPA three-factor formula to apportion income State M's corporate tax rate is 4.5 percent, and State N's corporate tax rate is 7 percent. This year, Oldham had the following sales, payroll, and property (in thousands of dollars) in each state: Gross receipts from sales Payroll expense Property costs State M 3,000 800 900 State N $ 7,500 1,200 1,000 Total $ 10,500 2,000 1,900 Required: Oldham's before-tax income was $3 million. Compute Oldham's State M and State N tax if State N uses an apportionment formula in which the sales factor is double-weighted. (Round all apportionment factors to 4 decimal places, e.g., 47.15% would be 0.4715. Enter "Apportionment percentage" and "Tax rate" in decimals and not in percentage. Do not round any intermediate values. Enter your answers in dollars and not in millions or thousands of dollars.)
Herger Corporation does business in California, Nevada, and Oregon and has income tax nexus in these states as well. Herger's California state tax base was $939,500 after making the required federal/state adjustments. Herger's federal tax return contains the following items: Item Amount Federal T-note interest income $ 4,700 Nevada municipal bond interest income $ 4,040 California municipal bond interest income $ 6,400 Interest expense related to T-note interest income $ 1,710 Royalty income $ 112,000 Travel expenses $ 9,300 Determine Herger's business income.
Cromwell Corporation does business in two states, A and B. State A uses an equal-weighted, three-factor apportionment formula and has a 5 percent state tax rate. State B uses an apportionment formula that double-weights the sales factor and has a 6 percent state tax rate. Cromwell's state-level taxable income, before apportionment, is $2 million. It has identified the following components of its sales, payroll, and property factors: Sales Payroll Average property State A $ 6,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Required A Required B Required: a. Calculate Cromwell's apportionment factors, income apportioned to each state, and state tax liability. b. State B is considering changing its apportionment formula to place 100 percent of the weight on the sales factor, ignoring payroll and property for apportionment purposes. Given its current levels of activity, what would Cromwell's state tax liability be for each state? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Apportionment…
Cromwell Corporation does business in two states, A and B. State A uses an equal-weighted, three-factor apportionment formula and has a 5 percent state tax rate. State B uses an apportionment formula that double-weights the sales factor and has a 6 percent state tax rate. Cromwell's state-level taxable income, before apportionment, is $3.5 million. It has identified the following components of its sales, payroll, and property factors: Sales Payroll Average property Required: State A $ 7,500,000 3,500,000 2,500,000 State B $ 4,750,000 2,700,000 1,550,000 Total $ 12,250,000 6,200,000 4,050,000 a. Calculate Cromwell's apportionment factors, income apportioned to each state, and state tax liability. b. State B is considering changing its apportionment formula to place 100 percent of the weight on the sales factor, ignoring payroll and property for apportionment purposes. Given its current levels of activity, what would Cromwell's state tax liability be for each state? Answer is not…
Ashton Corporation is headquartered in Pennsylvania and has a state income tax base there of $550.000. Of this amount, $89.000 was nonbusiness income. Ashton's Pennsylvania apportionment factor is 41.70 percent. The nonbusiness income allocated to Pennsylvania was $47,500. Assuming a Pennsylvania corporate tax rate of 8.25 percent, what is Ashton's Pennsylvania state tax liability? Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount. State tax liability → $ 19,860
Cromwell Corporation does business in two states, A and B. State A uses an equal-weighted, three-factor apportionment formula and has a 5 percent state tax rate. State B uses an apportionment formula that double-weights the sales factor and has a 6 percent state tax rate. Cromwell's state-level taxable income, before apportionment, is $3.5 million. It has identified the following components of its sales, payroll, and property factors: Sales Payroll Average property Required A Required B State A $ 7,500,000 3,500,000 2,500,000 Required: a. Calculate Cromwell's apportionment factors, income apportioned to each state, and state tax liability. b. State B is considering changing its apportionment formula to place 100 percent of the weight on the sales factor, ignoring payroll and property for apportionment purposes. Given its current levels of activity, what would Cromwell's state tax liability be for each state? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.…
Ashton Corporation is headquartered in Pennsylvania and has a state income tax base there of $543,000. Of this amount, $63,000 was nonbusiness income. Ashton's Pennsylvania apportionment factor is 42.35 percent. The nonbusiness income allocated to Pennsylvania was $28,250. Assuming a Pennsylvania corporate tax rate of 8.25 percent, what is Ashton's Pennsylvania state tax liability?
Jurisdiction B levies a flat 7 percent tax on the first $5 million of annual corporate income. Required: Jersey Incorporated generated $2.7 million income this year. Compute Jersey’s income tax and determine its average and marginal tax rate on total income. Leray Incorporated generated $7.4 million income this year. Compute Leray’s income tax and determine Leray’s average and marginal tax rate on total income. What type of rate structure does Jurisdiction B use for its corporate income tax?
Company K operates in a jurisdiction that levies an income tax with the following rate structure: Percentage Rate Bracket Income from -0- to $75,000 Income from $75,001 to $150,000 Income in excess of $150,000 Company K incurs a $35,000 deductible expense. Required: a. Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K's taxable income before considering the additional deduction is $71,600. b. Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K's taxable income before considering the additional deduction is $178,000. c. Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K has a $7,250 loss before considering the additional deduction. 7% 10 15 Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Required C Compute the current year tax savings from the deduction assuming that Company K's taxable income before additional deduction is $71,600. Tax savings
Multiple Choice $200,933 $174,983 $208,433 $172,509
On its year 1 financial statements, Seatax Corporation, an accrual-method taxpayer, reported federal income tax expense of $570,000. On its year 1 tax return, it reported a tax liability of $650,000. During year 1, Seatax made estimated tax payments of $700,000. What book-tax difference, if any, associated with its federal income tax expense should Seatax have reported when computing its year 1 taxable income? Is the difference favorable or unfavorable? Is it temporary or permanent? Year 1 Book-tax Difference Favorable or Unfavorable Temporary or Permanent

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

SWFT Essntl Tax Individ/Bus Entities 2020

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357391266

Author:

Nellen

Publisher:

Cengage

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357110362

Author:

Murphy

Publisher:

CENGAGE L

SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357391723

Author:

Maloney

Publisher:

Cengage

SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357233306

Author:

Maloney

Publisher:

Cengage

SWFT Essntl Tax Individ/Bus Entities 2020

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357391266

Author:

Nellen

Publisher:

Cengage

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357110362

Author:

Murphy

Publisher:

CENGAGE L

SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357391723

Author:

Maloney

Publisher:

Cengage

SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019

Accounting

ISBN:

9780357233306

Author:

Maloney

Publisher:

Cengage

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

GET THE APP

About FAQ Academic Integrity Sitemap Document Sitemap

Contact Bartleby Contact Research (Essays)High School Textbooks Literature Guides Concept Explainers by Subject Essay Help Mobile App

GET THE APP

Privacy

Your CA Privacy Rights

Your NV Privacy Rights

About Ads

Manage My Data

bartleby, a Learneo, Inc. business

Item	$
Federal T-note interest income	5,900
Nevada municipal bond interest income	3,690
California municipal bond interest income	5,500
Interest expense related to T-note interest income	1,540
Royalty income	181,000
Travel expenses	10,100