Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780134492049
Author: Daron Acemoglu, David Laibson, John List
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 10P
(a)
To determine
The game tree and equilibrium for the game between Jones and Smith.
(b)
To determine
The credibility of the promise made by Smith.
(c)
To determine
The game tree for a case where Jones makes a credible commitment.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The Tampa Tribune and the St. Petersburg Times compete for readers in the Tampa Bay market for newspapers. Recently, both newspapers considered changing the prices they charge for their Sunday editions. Suppose they considered the following payoff table for making a simultaneous decision to charge either a low price of $0.50 or a high price of $1.00. Tampa’s profits are shown in regular type. St. Petersburg’s profits are shown in bold.
7. Which cell(s) is/are strategically stable?
Home Depot and Lowe's are in a price war on refrigerators. Refrigerators at Home Depot cost $1,000 with a price matching
guarantee of a 10% rebate on the price difference with Lowe's, whose refrigerators cost $800. Is this price matching
guarantee with a 10% rebate beneficial to the consumer?
No, eventually both stores will offer the price matching with rebate and post the price of refrigerators at $1,000, the
High Price.
Yes, consumers will be able to buy their refrigerators at Home Depot for $780.
No, both Lowe's and Home Depot will stop selling refrigerators.
O Yes, consumers will be able to buy refrigerators at either store at the Low Price of $800, the lower posted price.
Andy and Cathy are in the sporting good industry. Andy has
developed a new lightweight soccer goal and is trying to
decide whether to sell it at a high price or a low price. Selling
the good at a higher price will provide higher profits but
might entice Cathy to develop and sell a competing
lightweight soccer goal. A lower price could deter entry from
Cathy. After Andy sets his price, Cathy must decide to enter
the market for the new lightweight soccer goal or not. Assume
that both Andy and Cathy must make at least $5,000 to make
the investment worthwhile.
Which price will Andy charge?
O high price
● low price
What will Cathy do as a result of Andy's choice?
O Cathy will enter the market.
O Cathy will not enter the market.
Indicate each person's final profit.
Andy's profit: $
7000
Cathy's profit: $
7000
Andy:
charges
high or
low price
Andy
charges
the high
price
Andy
charges
the low
price
Cathy:
enter or
do not
enter
Cathy:
enter or
do not
enter
Cathy
enters
Cathy
does not
enter
Cathy…
Chapter 13 Solutions
Microeconomics (2nd Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose a town only has two petrol stations, United and BP. Each could choose to charge a high price or low price, as shown in the matrix below. ВР BP charges a low price: BP has low profit; United BP charges a high price: BP has no profit; United has high profit United charges a United low price: has low profit ВР United charges a high price: has BP has average profit; United high profit; United has no has average profit profit (a) What is the dominant strategy for the above matrix (i.e., a Nash equilibrium)? Explain briefly (b) If the two petrol stations could collude, what would be the likely strategy? Explain briefly. (c) Briefly explain the principles of the 'kinked' demand curve by using an example such as pricing a product by the two supermarket giants.arrow_forwardYou sell two products; Good X and Good Y. There are three types of customers based on their reservation prices in the table below. The marginal cost of Good X is $5, and the marginal cost of Good Y is $5. If you use a mixed bundling strategy, what would be your profit from a mixed bundling strategy (TM)? Customer Type Туре I Туре II Туре II Good X Good Y 45 40 15 10 20 OTM = $110. O TM = $105. TM= $100. IM= $95. None of the above.arrow_forwardThere is a duopoly in the market, with Firm A and Firm B considering whether to compete against each other or cooperate. If Firm A and Firm B both agree to cooperate, they will each earn $1,010$1,010 in profits. If one of them decides to compete at the expense of the other, it will earn $1,800$1,800 in profits, while the other will earn three times less.Calculate the difference between the total profits for both firms when they cooperate and when one takes advantage of the other. Write the exact answer. Do not round.arrow_forward
- Matt and Lin are both math tutors. They know that if they collude and set a high price, both will earn a profit of 100; whereas if they both set a low price, both will earn a profit of 50. If one person sets a high price and the other person sets a low price, the person who sets a low price price gets a profit of 125 and the one with a high price gets a profit of 0. Fill in the payoffs in the normal-form game below where Lin is player 1 (represented by rows) and Matt is player 2 (represented by columns). Matt High Low Lin High Lowarrow_forward1. Consider an industry with inverse demand given by p = 8 – q, where p is the price, and q is the quantity. There is one incumbent firm and one potential entrant. In the first stage of the game, the incumbent chooses its quantity qi. In the second stage, the potential entrant observes qi and chooses its quantity Ce. The potential entrant can also decide not to enter the market. The production technology of both firms are represented by the cost function C = 2q. To enter industry implies a fixed entry cost of F. (a) Find the equilibrium of the game, assuming that the potential entrant enters the industry. What are the profits of firms? (b) Assume that entry is not blockaded. For which values of F does the incumbent firm prefer to deter entry? (c) For which values of F, entry blockaded?arrow_forward5. Consider a single manufacturer (M) and a single retailer (R). Suppose the final demand function is Q=20-4p. M produces at AC=MC=2. The game is played out as below: In stage 1, M decides the wholesale price pw. In stage 2, R decides the retail price pr to consumers. a. Find the values of pr and pw in equilibrium b. Suppose M and R vertically integrate. Find the optimal price for the integrated firmarrow_forward
- American Airlines and Braniff Airways are the two airlines operating flights from your region. Suppose that each company can charge either a high price for tickets or a low price. First, American Airlines will choose the price level. Following this, Braniff Airways will observe its competitor’s decision and choose the price level for its tickets. If both of the companies choose High, they earn $25,000 each. If they both choose Low, they earn $18,000 each. If the companies choose different levels of prices, the one choosing the high price will earn $15,000 and the one choosing Low will earn $30,000. a) Draw the game three. b) Solve the game by using backwards induction. c) If Braniff Airlines makes a promise to choose High if American Airlines chooses High, should American Airlines trust this promise? Explain.arrow_forwardBurger Doodle, the incumbent firm, wishes to set a limit price of $8 (rather than the profit-maximizing price of $12) to prevent Designer Burger from entering its profitable market. The game tree above shows the payoffs for various decisions. Burger Doodle makes its pricing decision, then Designer Burger decides whether to enter or stay out of the market. If Designer Burger chooses to enter the market, then Burger Doodle may or may not decide to accommodate Designer’s entry by changing its initial price to the Nash equilibrium price of $10. If Burger Doodle canNOT make a credible commitment to maintain its initial price should Designer Burger decide to enter the market, then Burger Doodle will set price equal to $________ at decision node 1 and the outcome _____________(is, is not) a Nash equilibrium.arrow_forwardEmily and Brooklyn are competitors in a local market. Each is trying to decide if it is better to advertise on TV, on radio, or not at all. If they both advertise on TV, each will earn a profit of $5000. If they both advertise on radio, each will earn a profit of $7000. If neither advertises at all, each will earn a profit of $10,000. If one advertises on TV and the other advertises on radio, then the one advertising on TV will earn $8000 and the other will earn $3000. If one advertises on TV and the other does not advertise, then the one advertising on TV will earn $15,000 and the other will earn $2000. If one advertises on radio and the other does not advertise, then the one advertising on radio will earn $12,000 and the other will earn $4000. If both follow their dominant strategy, what will Emily do and what will she earn? advertise on radio and earn $7000 not advertise and earn $10,000 advertise on TV and earn $5000 advertise on TV and earn $15,000arrow_forward
- The Old Familiar and The Beehive are the only two bistros in town. Each is trying to decide whether or not it should advertise in the local newspaper. The accompanying payoff table gives their weekly profits under each possible outcome. The Beehive The Beehive does advertise | does not advertise The Old Familiar The Old Familiar earns $X in profits. earns $3,500 in profits. The Old Familiar does advertise The Beehive The Beehive earns $Y in profits. earns $2,250 in profits. The Old Familiar The Old Familiar earns $2,000 in profits. earns $2,500 in profits. The Old Familiar does not advertise The Beehive The Beehive earns $4,000 in profits. earns $3,500 in profits. a. Which combination or combinations of X and Y would make a situation in which The Old Familiar does not advertise and The Beehive advertises a Nash equilibrium? A Nash equilibrium occurs ifarrow_forwardTable 2 below represents the payoff matrix for two firms, X and Y, who compete with each other. Payoffs are in millions of pounds (£) profit. Each firm may choose one of two strategies i.e. set a high price for its output or set a low price for its output. Neither firm knows what strategy the other will adopt. Table 2 11. Firm Y High Price Low Price Firm X High Price X-£7mn, Y-£7mn X=£1mn, Y=£15mn Low Price X-£15mn, Y-£1mn X=£4mn, Y=£4mn In the absence of collusion, which combination of strategies is most likely to occur? a) X sets a low price and Y sets a low price. b) X sets a high price and Y sets a low price. c) X sets a low price and Y sets a high price. d) X sets a high price and Y sets a high price.arrow_forwardThere are two sellers who compete by choosing quantity (Cournot). The inverse demand is P = 120 − Q. Each firm’s cost is 30Q. There are no fixed costs. In this market, firms decide how much to produce, and then the price is determined by the market (think of fishing boats, for example). Suppose that Firm 2 produces 30. Then the inverse demand facing Firm 1 is P = 120 − 30 − Q1 = 90 − Q1. This implies that Firm 1’s marginal revenue is 90 −2Q1. How much will Firm 1 produce to maximize its profits? Suppose that Firm 1 produces 30. Then the inverse demand facing Firm 2 is P = 120 − 30 − Q2 = 90 − Q2. This implies that Firm 2’s marginal revenue is 90 −2Q2. How much will Firm 2 produce to maximize its profits? If both firms produce 30, what are both firms’ profits? Suppose the buyers in this market proposed that the firms compete in a price game rather than a quantity game. For example, they might suggest that sellers compete in a price auction before production takes place. The winner…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education