Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 9Q
Summary Introduction
To discuss: Whether person B entitled to get $20 gold piece.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Mr. A wrote and mailed to Mr. B offering to sell his truck worth $10,500.00. In response, Mr. B replied by mail with a counteroffer of $8,000.00. Days later, Mr. B wrote again to Mr. A and said that he accepted the offer of $10,500.00 and the letter reached to Mr. A. Though there was an acceptance to the offer, but Mr. A decided to sell his truck to other interested party.
1. Is there a binding contract between Mr. A & B? If yes or no, please support your statement.
Rowe advertised in newspapers of wide circulation and otherwise made known that she would pay $5,000 for a complete set consisting of ten volumes of certain rare books. Ford, not knowing of the offer, gave Rowe all but one volume of the set of rare books as a Christmas present. Ford later learned of the offer, obtained the one remaining book, tendered it to Rowe, and demanded the $5,000. Rowe refused to pay. Is Ford entitled to the $5,000?
On February 18, Clancy, who was in debt, took his stereo to Lucy’s repair shop. Because Lucy and Clancy were old friends, Lucy didn’t give him a receipt. On February 19, hounded by creditors, Clancy sold the stereo on credit to Grover, who was to pick it up on February 21 at Lucy’s, pay Lucy the repair bill, and pay the balance of the purchase price to Clancy. Who is entitled to the radio if, on February 20, Clancy’s creditor appears with the sheriff to seize the stereo from Lucy? Why?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1COCh. 10 - Prob. 2COCh. 10 - Prob. 3COCh. 10 - Prob. 4COCh. 10 - Prob. 5COCh. 10 - Prob. 1QCh. 10 - Prob. 2QCh. 10 - Prob. 3QCh. 10 - Prob. 4QCh. 10 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 10 - Prob. 6QCh. 10 - Prob. 7QCh. 10 - Prob. 8QCh. 10 - Prob. 9QCh. 10 - Prob. 10QCh. 10 - Prob. 11QCh. 10 - Prob. 12QCh. 10 - Prob. 13QCh. 10 - Prob. 14CPCh. 10 - Prob. 15CPCh. 10 - Prob. 16CPCh. 10 - Prob. 17CPCh. 10 - Prob. 18CPCh. 10 - Prob. 19CPCh. 10 - Prob. 20CPCh. 10 - Prob. 21CPCh. 10 - Prob. 22CPCh. 10 - Prob. 23CPCh. 10 - Prob. 1TSCh. 10 - Prob. 2TSCh. 10 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Marge sold her car to Rupert, her very good friend on credit for $100,000. He paid down $30,000, but after a few months, and having not seeing Rupert, Marge decided to take back the car. Lucky for her, she did not give Rupert the papers for the car. She saw Henry with the car, who told her that Rupert sold it to him and promised to give him the papers soon; i. Can Rupert keep the car? why or why not. ii. Can Marge get back the car? why or why not. iii. Would the situation be different if Marge had given Rupert the papers for the car? iv. What type of contract did Rupert and Henry enter into?arrow_forwardA offered to sell his automobile to B for P50,000. After inspecting the automobile, B offered to buy it for P50,000. This offer was accepted by A. The next day, A offered to deliver the automobile, but B, being short of funds, secured a postponement of the delivery, promising to pay A the price “upon arrival in this port of the steamer Helena.” The steamer, however, never arrived because it was wrecked somewhere off the coast of Samar. (a) Is there a perfected contract in this case? Why? (b) Is the promise to pay made by B conditional or with a term? Why? (c) Can A compel B to pay the purchase price and to accept the automobile? Why?arrow_forwardThe H owned and operated a successful small bakery and grocery store. They spoke with L, an agent of Red Owl Stores, who told them that for $18,000, Red Owl would build a store and fully stock it for them. The H sold their bakery and grocery store and purchased a lot on which Red Owl was to build the store. L then told H that the price had gone up to $26,000. The H borrowed the extra money from relatives, but then L informed them that the cost would be $34,000. Negotiations broke off and the H sued. Can H win the case? Explain.arrow_forward
- Shah, in response to an inquiry by Onyango regarding the possible sale of his (Shah’s) car, wrote to Onyango stating, “I have decided to sell to you my car for ksh 2,000,000. If I hear nothing from you before next Sunday, I will take it that you have accepted. “Onyango considered the price to be too high and decided to look for another car but forgot to reply to Shah’s letter. Shah is now threatening to sue Onyango for breach of contract. Advise Onyango.arrow_forwardWolcott and Sarah, both merchants and residents of Gainesville, Florida, aspire to enter into a contract with each other for the sale/purchase of goods. After Wolcott makes an offer to Sarah, Sarah responds with a written confirmation of acceptance; however, this written confirmation of acceptance states additional terms that are not present in Wolcott's offer. Nevertheless, Wolcott's offer did not expressly limit acceptance to the terms of his offer and Sarah's additional terms do not materially alter Wolcott's offer. If Wolcott does not give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, which of the following will occur? O Due to the Mirror Image Rule, a contract is not founded until both Wolcott and Sarah agree to the same exact terms. ODue to Wolcott's failure to give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, Sarah's terms will become part of the contract. O Sarah's additional terms constitute a rejection of Wolcott's offer and…arrow_forwardNorma English made an offer to purchase a house owned by Michael and Laurie Montgomery (Montgomery) for $272,000. In her offer, English also proposed to purchase certain personal property—paving stones and a fireplace screen worth a total of $100—from Montgomery. When Montgomery received English’s offer, Montgomery made many changes to English’s offer, including deleting the paving stones and fireplace screen from the personal property that English wanted. When English received the Montgomery counteroffer, English accepted and initialed all of Montgomery’s changes except that English did not initial the change that deleted the paving stones and fireplace screen from the deal.Subsequently, Montgomery notified English that because English had not completely accepted the terms of Montgomery’s counteroffer, Montgomery was therefore withdrawing from the deal. That same day, Montgomery signed a contract to sell the house to another buyer for $285,000. English sued Montgomery for specific…arrow_forward
- Jim offered to buy James' porche motor vehicle. Jim gave James 2 weeks for an answer, two days after, Jane offered to sell her porche motor vehicle to Jim for which he was very excited to purchase because she had the latest model. Jim called James and told him personally that he is no longer interested in purchasing his porche. James is very upset because he was keen to sell. he is of the view that Jim cannot withdraw his offer because the 2 weeks has not elapsed. he knows that you are a business law student and sought your advice on the matter. Advise James. Will your answer be the same, if Jim failed to communicate to James within the two weeks that he no longer is interested in purchasing James' porche motor vehicle and James accepted on the last day of the end of the two weeks? Please answer using the IRAC model.arrow_forwardExecutive Financial Services, Inc. (EFS), purchased three tractors from Tri-County Farm Company (Tri-County), a John Deere dealership owned by Gene Mohr and James Loyd. The tractors cost $48,000, $19,000, and $38,000. EFS did not take possession of the tractors but instead left the tractors on Tri-County’s lot. EFS leased the tractors to Mohr-Loyd Leasing (Mohr-Loyd), a partnership between Mohr and Loyd, with the understanding and representation by Mohr-Loyd that the tractors would be leased out to farmers. Instead of leasing the tractors, Tri-County sold them to three different farmers. EFS sued and obtained judgment against Tri-County, Mohr-Loyd, and Mohr and Loyd personally for breach of contract. Because that judgment remained unsatisfied, EFS sued the three farmers who bought the tractors to recover the tractors from them. a) What does the entrustment rule provide? Explain. b) Did Mohr and Loyd act ethically in this case? c) Who owns the tractors, EFS or the farmers?arrow_forwardStein, a mechanic, and Beal, a life insurance agent, entered into a written contract for the sale of Stein’s tractor to Beal for $6,800 cash. It was agreed that Stein would tune the motor on the tractor. Stein fulfilled this obligation and on the night of July 1 telephoned Beal that the tractor was ready to be picked up upon Beal’s making payment. Beal responded, “I’ll be there in the morning with the money.” On the next morning, however, Beal was approached by an insurance prospect and decided to get the tractor at a later date. On the night of .July 2, the tractor was destroyed by fire of unknown origin. Neither Stein nor Beal had any fire insurance. Who must bear the loss? Why?arrow_forward
- An agent is NOT personally liable on a contract made with a third party when: 1) neither the existence, nor the name of the principal is known to the third party. 2) the name and existence of the principal are known to the third party. 3) the agent makes the contract with the third party in his/her personal capacity as a co-signor or obligor with the principal. 4) the existence, but not the name of the principal is known to the third party.arrow_forwardAssume that before Rafael takes possession of the plane, Barron has begun to use it in his new business offering air tours of Glacier National Park in Montana. Does his use of the plane for business purposes impact the bank's security interest in the plane?arrow_forwardOn March 5, 2020, A wrote a letter to B offering to him the lease of a building. On March 6, 2020, at 1:00 P.M. sent a letter of acceptance which h was received by A at 4:00 P.M. that day. But at 2:00 P.M., A had already sent B a letter of withdrawal of the offer which was received by B at 5:00 P.M. Was the contract perfected ? Reasons?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON