Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 15CP
Summary Introduction
Given situation:
Person M entered a contract with person T to purchase of real property on November 26 and the next day he executed the contract. Later after execution of contract but before it was received by person T in city F, he called attorney of person M to repudiate the contract.
To discuss: Whether a contract exists between person T and person M.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The Thoelkes were owners of real property located in Orange County, which the Morrisons agreed to purchase. The Morrisons signed a contract for the sale of that property and mailed it to the Thoelkes in Texas on November 26. The next day the Thoelkes executed the contract and placed it in the mail addressed to the Morrisons’ attorney in Florida. After the executed contract was mailed but before it was received in Florida, the Thoelkes called the Morrisons’ attorney in Florida and attempted to repudiate the contract. Does a contract exist between the Thoelkes and the Morrisons? Discuss.
On March 1, Lucas called Craig on the telephone and offered to pay him $190,000 for a house and lot that Craig owned. Craig accepted the offer immediately on the telephone. Later in the same day, Lucas told Annabelle that if she would marry him, he would convey to her the property he then owned, which was the subject of the earlier agreement. On March 2, Lucas called Penelope and offered her $25,000 if she would work for him for the year commencing March 15, and she agreed. Lucas and Annabelle were married on June 25. By this time, Craig had refused to convey the house to Lucas. Thereafter, Lucas renounced his promise to convey the property to Annabelle. Penelope, who had been working for Lucas, was discharged without cause on July 5; Annabelle left Lucas and instituted divorce proceedings. What rights, if any, have— a. Lucas against Craig for his failure to convey the property? b. Annabelle against Lucas for failure to convey the house to her? c. Penelope against Lucas for discharging…
On November 19, Hoover Motor Express Company sent to Clements Paper Company a written offer to purchase certain real estate. Sometime in December, Clements authorized Williams to accept. Williams, however, attempted to bargain with Hoover to obtain a better deal, specifically that Clements would retain easements on the property. In a telephone conversation on January 13 of the following year, Williams first told Hoover of his plan to obtain the easements. Hoover replied, “Well, I don’t know if we are ready. We have not decided; we might not want to go through with it.” On January 20, Clements sent a written acceptance of Hoover’s offer. Hoover refused to buy, claiming it had revoked its offer through the January 13 phone conversation. Clements then brought suit to compel the sale or obtain damages. Did Hoover successfully revoke its offer? Explain.
Chapter 10 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1COCh. 10 - Prob. 2COCh. 10 - Prob. 3COCh. 10 - Prob. 4COCh. 10 - Prob. 5COCh. 10 - Prob. 1QCh. 10 - Prob. 2QCh. 10 - Prob. 3QCh. 10 - Prob. 4QCh. 10 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 10 - Prob. 6QCh. 10 - Prob. 7QCh. 10 - Prob. 8QCh. 10 - Prob. 9QCh. 10 - Prob. 10QCh. 10 - Prob. 11QCh. 10 - Prob. 12QCh. 10 - Prob. 13QCh. 10 - Prob. 14CPCh. 10 - Prob. 15CPCh. 10 - Prob. 16CPCh. 10 - Prob. 17CPCh. 10 - Prob. 18CPCh. 10 - Prob. 19CPCh. 10 - Prob. 20CPCh. 10 - Prob. 21CPCh. 10 - Prob. 22CPCh. 10 - Prob. 23CPCh. 10 - Prob. 1TSCh. 10 - Prob. 2TSCh. 10 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Norma English made an offer to purchase a house owned by Michael and Laurie Montgomery (Montgomery) for $272,000. In her offer, English also proposed to purchase certain personal property—paving stones and a fireplace screen worth a total of $100—from Montgomery. When Montgomery received English’s offer, Montgomery made many changes to English’s offer, including deleting the paving stones and fireplace screen from the personal property that English wanted. When English received the Montgomery counteroffer, English accepted and initialed all of Montgomery’s changes except that English did not initial the change that deleted the paving stones and fireplace screen from the deal.Subsequently, Montgomery notified English that because English had not completely accepted the terms of Montgomery’s counteroffer, Montgomery was therefore withdrawing from the deal. That same day, Montgomery signed a contract to sell the house to another buyer for $285,000. English sued Montgomery for specific…arrow_forwardWolcott and Sarah, both merchants and residents of Gainesville, Florida, aspire to enter into a contract with each other for the sale/purchase of goods. After Wolcott makes an offer to Sarah, Sarah responds with a written confirmation of acceptance; however, this written confirmation of acceptance states additional terms that are not present in Wolcott's offer. Nevertheless, Wolcott's offer did not expressly limit acceptance to the terms of his offer and Sarah's additional terms do not materially alter Wolcott's offer. If Wolcott does not give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, which of the following will occur? O Due to the Mirror Image Rule, a contract is not founded until both Wolcott and Sarah agree to the same exact terms. ODue to Wolcott's failure to give notification of objection to Sarah's terms within a reasonable time, Sarah's terms will become part of the contract. O Sarah's additional terms constitute a rejection of Wolcott's offer and…arrow_forwardMr. A wrote and mailed to Mr. B offering to sell his truck worth $10,500.00. In response, Mr. B replied by mail with a counteroffer of $8,000.00. Days later, Mr. B wrote again to Mr. A and said that he accepted the offer of $10,500.00 and the letter reached to Mr. A. Though there was an acceptance to the offer, but Mr. A decided to sell his truck to other interested party. 1. Is there a binding contract between Mr. A & B? If yes or no, please support your statement.arrow_forward
- On March 5, 1956, A wrote a letter to B offering to him the lease of a building. On March 6, 1956, at 1:00 P.M., B sent a letter of acceptance which was received by A at 4:00 P.M. that day. But at 2:00 P.M., A had already sent B a letter of withdrawal of the offer which was received by B at 5:00 P.M. Was the contract perfected? Reasonsarrow_forwardAn artist once produced a painting now called The Plains of Meudon. For a while, the parties in this case thought that the artist was Theodore Rousseau, a prominent member of the Barbizon school, and that the painting was quite valuable. With this idea in mind, the Kohlers consigned the painting to Leslie Hindman, Inc. (Hindman), an auction house. Among other things, the consignment agreement between the Kohlers and Hindman defined the scope of Hindman’s authority as agent. First, Hindman was obliged to sell the painting according to the conditions of sale spelled out in the auction catalog. Those conditions provided that neither the consignors nor Hindman made any warranties of authenticity. Second, the consignment agreement gave Hindman extensive and exclusive discretionary authority to rescind sales if in its “sole discretion” it determined that the sale subjected the company or the Kohlers to any liability under a warranty of authenticity. Despite having some doubts about its…arrow_forwardThe primary duty of a principal to an agent is to create a binding contract whereby the responsibilities of the agent are clearly enumerated.arrow_forward
- On May 1, Melforth Realty Company offered to sell Greenacre to Dallas, Inc., for $1 million. The offer was made by a letter sent by overnight delivery and stated that the offer would expire on May 15. Dallas decided to purchase the property and sent a letter by registered first-class mail to Melforth on May 10, accepting the offer. Due to unexplained delays in the postal service, Melforth did not receive the letter until May 22. Melforth wishes to sell Greenacre to another buyer, who is offering $1.2 million for the tract of land. Has a contract resulted between Melforth and Dallas?arrow_forwardAn agent is NOT personally liable on a contract made with a third party when: 1) neither the existence, nor the name of the principal is known to the third party. 2) the name and existence of the principal are known to the third party. 3) the agent makes the contract with the third party in his/her personal capacity as a co-signor or obligor with the principal. 4) the existence, but not the name of the principal is known to the third party.arrow_forwardSharon contracted with Jane, a shirtmaker, for one thousand shirts for men. Jane manufactured and delivered five hundred shirts, which were paid for by Sharon. At the same time, Sharon notified Jane that she could not use or dispose of the other five hundred shirts and directed Jane not to manufacture any more under the contract. Nevertheless, Jane proceeded to make up the other five hundred shirts and tendered them to Sharon. Sharon refused to accept the shirts, and Jane then sued for the purchase price. Is she entitled to the purchase price? If not, is she entitled to any damages? Explain.arrow_forward
- Barnes accepted Clark’s offer to sell to him a portion of Clark’s coin collection. Clark forgot that his prized $20 gold piece at the time of the offer and acceptance was included in the portion that he offered to sell to Barnes. Clark did not intend to include the gold piece in the sale. Barnes, at the time of inspecting the offered portion of the collection and prior to accepting the offer, saw the gold piece. Is Barnes entitled to the $20 gold piece? Explainarrow_forwardWhat is the basis for enforcing a contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel?arrow_forwardMarge sold her car to Rupert, her very good friend on credit for $100,000. He paid down $30,000, but after a few months, and having not seeing Rupert, Marge decided to take back the car. Lucky for her, she did not give Rupert the papers for the car. She saw Henry with the car, who told her that Rupert sold it to him and promised to give him the papers soon; i. Can Rupert keep the car? why or why not. ii. Can Marge get back the car? why or why not. iii. Would the situation be different if Marge had given Rupert the papers for the car? iv. What type of contract did Rupert and Henry enter into?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON