Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 12Q
Summary Introduction
To discuss: Whether person H successfully revokes the offer.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
1. John has a lending company. In his letter mailed on September 15, he offered to sell his business to Peter for $20,000.00. The letter was received by Peter on September 20. On September 25, Peter sent his letter of acceptance in which John received on September 28. However, on September 23, John had decided to withdraw and mailed a letter to Peter revoking it. The letter was not received until September 29.
Did the contract form? When? Please state your reasons
2. A father made a will leaving everything to his infant son. In his will and testament, he appointed John as his executor, in the event of his death. As executor, John is responsible to administer his estate on behalf of his son. Prior to the death of the father, he bought a piece of land using a mortgage and began building a cottage on this land. Prior to its completion, he died. Upon his death, John then acts as the son’s guardian and administrator of the estate on his behalf. John was not paid for this service.
As a…
On May 1, Melforth Realty Company offered to sell Greenacre to Dallas, Inc., for $1 million. The offer was made by a letter sent by overnight delivery and stated that the offer would expire on May 15. Dallas decided to purchase the property and sent a letter by registered first-class mail to Melforth on May 10, accepting the offer. Due to unexplained delays in the postal service, Melforth did not receive the letter until May 22. Melforth wishes to sell Greenacre to another buyer, who is offering $1.2 million for the tract of land. Has a contract resulted between Melforth and Dallas?
On December 16, Daniella sent a letter to Casper offering to sell her business to Casper for $400,000. On December 29, Daniella sent another letter to Casper that stated that she was withdrawing the offer. Casper received that letter on December 31. On December 30, Casper sent a letter to Daniella accepting the offer. Daniella received that letter of acceptance on January 3. Daniella refused to sell the business to Casper, claiming that no contract had been formed. Casper sued to enforce the contract against Daniella . Decide the probable outcome of the case.
Chapter 10 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1COCh. 10 - Prob. 2COCh. 10 - Prob. 3COCh. 10 - Prob. 4COCh. 10 - Prob. 5COCh. 10 - Prob. 1QCh. 10 - Prob. 2QCh. 10 - Prob. 3QCh. 10 - Prob. 4QCh. 10 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 10 - Prob. 6QCh. 10 - Prob. 7QCh. 10 - Prob. 8QCh. 10 - Prob. 9QCh. 10 - Prob. 10QCh. 10 - Prob. 11QCh. 10 - Prob. 12QCh. 10 - Prob. 13QCh. 10 - Prob. 14CPCh. 10 - Prob. 15CPCh. 10 - Prob. 16CPCh. 10 - Prob. 17CPCh. 10 - Prob. 18CPCh. 10 - Prob. 19CPCh. 10 - Prob. 20CPCh. 10 - Prob. 21CPCh. 10 - Prob. 22CPCh. 10 - Prob. 23CPCh. 10 - Prob. 1TSCh. 10 - Prob. 2TSCh. 10 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Wong engages Chen as his agent to sell his house. Wong's brother tells Chen that Wong will sell the house for $500.000. A purchaser offers to buy the house for $510.000. Chen tells the purchaser, I can accept that offer on behalf of my client The purchaser obtains a bank loan to buy the house. When Wong finds out what Chen has done he is furious and refuses to accept the proposed sale agreement. Which of the following statements is true: (A) Wong is bound to sell the house to the purchaser for $510,000. (B) Wong is not bound by Chen's acceptance' because he did not authorize Chen to make any sale agreement on his behalf. (C) Wong's brother authorized Chen to accept the offer and therefore Wong is bound to sell the house to the purchaser for $510,000. (D) Chen is entitled to apply to the court for an order of specific performance compelling Wong to complete the contractarrow_forwardMartha sells goods to James for $25,000. Martha assigns her right to receive the $25,000 to XYZ Finance James refuses to pay XYZ the $25,000. James makes two arguments for not paying. First James claims that XYZ has no privity of contract and that XYZ is not a third-party beneficiary of its contract with Martha. Second – James claims that the goods were worthless. Assume that the goods were worthless. You are the judge. Who wins and why? Address both arguments that James makes.arrow_forwardJohnson, who owned a hardware store, was indebted to Hutchinson, one of her suppliers. Johnson sold her business to Lockhart, one of Johnson’s previous competitors, who combined the inventory from Johnson’s store with his own and moved them to a new, larger store. Hutchinson claims that Lockhart must pay Johnson’s debt because the sale of the business had been made without complying with the requirements of the bulk sales law. Discuss whether Lockhart is obligated to pay Hutchison’s debt to Johnson.arrow_forward
- Lindsay enters into a contract with John to purchase John's sailboat. The parties agree that Lindsay will pick up the boat on July 1. On June 10, Lindsay sends an email to John telling him that she can no longer purchase the boat. On June 15, John sells the boat to Liv. on June 18, Lindsay calls John and said she changed her mind and would like to purchase the boat. John advised that he already sold it to Liv. By selling the boat to Liv before July 1, John has breached his contract with Lindsay. True Falsearrow_forwardOn April 1, Orizon LLC sent Jim Stevens a letter via overnight delivery, offering to employ him to audit Orizon, LLC’s financial statements for the current year for $10,000. In the letter, Orizon, LLC stated that Jim had ten days to accept. On April 5, Jim sent Orizon, LLC a fax that stated, "The price for the audit seems too low. Would you consider paying $12,000?" Orizon, LLC received the fax. The next day, Serena Williams heard about the offer to Jim and said to Orizon, LLC, “I will accept that offer!” On learning of Serena’s statement, Jim immediately e-mailed Orizon, LLC agreeing to do the work for $10,000. Orizon, LLC received this e-mail on April 7. 1. Explain in detail why Orizon, LLC and Jim do, or do not, have a contract. 2. If you did not discuss it already, would applying the mailbox rule change your answer in #1? 3. Can Serena accept this offer?arrow_forwardOn March 5, 1956, A wrote a letter to B offering to him the lease of a building. On March 6, 1956, at 1:00 P.M., B sent a letter of acceptance which was received by A at 4:00 P.M. that day. But at 2:00 P.M., A had already sent B a letter of withdrawal of the offer which was received by B at 5:00 P.M. Was the contract perfected? Reasonsarrow_forward
- Mr. A wrote and mailed to Mr. B offering to sell his truck worth $10,500.00. In response, Mr. B replied by mail with a counteroffer of $8,000.00. Days later, Mr. B wrote again to Mr. A and said that he accepted the offer of $10,500.00 and the letter reached to Mr. A. Though there was an acceptance to the offer, but Mr. A decided to sell his truck to other interested party. 1. Is there a binding contract between Mr. A & B? If yes or no, please support your statement.arrow_forwardCody offered to sell certain land to Daniel for $50,000 by a letter, which was signed by Cody. The letter specified that the deal was to be closed by Nov. 1, 2018, and that the entire payment was to be in cash. Daniel sent a letter saying that he accepted the offer, but his letter also stated that payment was to be made one-half at closing and one-half 30 days later. As of March 2019, Cody had not responded. Discuss in detail whether there is a valid contract between Cody and Daniel.arrow_forwardJoseph and Mai each bought shares of Apple stock at $200 per share. About a week later, Joseph called his stockbroker and told him that if Apple was trading below $195, he wanted to sell. The broker was very busy, so he didn’t check but Apple was trading at $194 per share. He told Joseph that it was not below $195, so Joseph did not sell the stock. Mai also called her stockbroker that day also and told him that if Apple was trading below $195, she wanted to sell. Once again, the broker was very busy, so he didn’t check but Apple was trading at $194 per share. He told Mai that it was not below $195. However, Mai saw the price on her computer and knew it was $94. However, Mai did not sell either. Apple dropped to $180 per share by the end of the day and they both sold suffering a large loss. They both sue the brokers. What are the probable outcomes of the suits?arrow_forward
- Smith was approached by a man who introduced himself as Brown of Brown & Co. Brown was not known to Smith, but Smith asked Dun & Bradstreet for a credit report and obtained a very favorable report on Brown. He thereupon sold Brown some expensive gems and billed Brown & Co. “Brown” turned out to be a clever jewel thief, who later sold the gems to Brown & Co. for valuable consideration. Brown & Co. was unaware of “Brown’s” transaction with Smith. Can Smith successfully sue Brown & Co. for either the return of the gems or the price as billed to Brown & Co.?arrow_forwardUnited Road Machinery Company, a dealer in heavy road equipment (including truck scales supplied by Thurman Scale Company), received a telephone call on July 21 from James Durham, an officer of Consolidated Coal Company, seeking to acquire truck scales for his coal mining operation. United and Consolidated entered into a twenty-four-month lease-purchase arrangement. United then notified Thurman that Consolidated would take possession of the scales directly. United paid for the scales and Consolidated took possession of them, but the latter never signed or returned the contract papers forwarded to it by United. Consolidated also never made any of the rental payments ($608/month) due under the lease. On September 20, Consolidated, through its officer Durham, sold the scales to Kentucky Mobile Homes for $8,500. Kentucky’s president, Ethard Jasper, checked the county records prior to the purchase and found no lien or encumbrance on the title; likewise, he denied knowledge of the dispute…arrow_forwardIn late 2013 or early 2014, the plaintiff, Lan England, agreed to sell 258,363 shares of stock to the defendant, Eugene Horbach, for $2.75 per share, for a total price of $710,498.25. Although the purchase money was to be paid in the first quarter of 2014, the defendant made periodic payments on the stock at least through September 2014. The parties met in May of 2015 to finalize the transaction. At this time, the plaintiff believed that the defendant owed at least $25,000 of the original purchase price. The defendant did not dispute that amount. The parties then reached a second agreement whereby the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff an additional $25,000 and to hold in trust 2 percent of the stock for the plaintiff. In return, the plaintiff agreed to transfer the stock and to forego his right to sue the defendant for breach of the original agreement. In December 2016, the plaintiff made a demand for the 2 percent stock, but the defendant refused, contending that the 2 percent…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON