You've just completed a depleting, or mentally draining task. After doing so do you think you would perform better than, the same as, or worse than other participants on a new task that requires you to be creative if the task is described as hard (as compared to if that task is described as easy)?
In this experiment, participants in the control group (the non-depleted group) were given 4 minutes to write a short story about a place they had recently visited (a relatively easy task). A second group of participants (the depleted group) was given the same task but they were told not to use the letters "U" and "K" in the story-a mucher harder task.
After the first task, all participants were told that they would next participate in a study of creativity. They were told that while creativity sometimes arises through inspiration, it can also come about through perseverance. All participants were told that they should use perseverance to get through the creative task. The catch? Half of the participants were told that perseverance on the task was hard. For the creative task, all participants were asked to come up with as many creative uses for a cord as possible. The researchers then counted the number of creative uses generated by each participant. In a section of their paper called, "Participants (N=112; M=21.78 years; 36 males. received course credit, were paid C 7, and were randomly assigned to a 2 (depletion vs. no delation) x 2 (perseverance described as [hard] vs. easy) between-subjects design.
What does this description tell us about the research design of the experiment?
a. Both have 2 dependant variables, both have 2 levels, and all participants were in all conditions.
b. Both have 2 dependant variables, both have 2 levels, and participants were in only one condition.
c. Both have 2 independent variables, both have 2 levels, and all participants were in all conditions.
d. Both have 2 independent variables, both have 2 levels, and participants were only in one condition.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
- You may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question. The Consumer Reports Restaurant Customer Satisfaction Survey is based upon 148,599 visits to full-service restaurant chains.t One of the variables in the study is meal price, the average amount paid per person for dinner and drinks, minus the tip. Suppose a reporter for a local newspaper thought that it would be of interest to her readers to conduct a similar study for restaurants located in her city. The reporter selected a sample of 8 seafood restaurants, 8 Italian restaurants, and 8 steakhouses. The following data show the meal prices ($) obtained for the 24 restaurants sampled. Italian Seafood Steakhouse $13 $16 $24 13 18 19 15 17 23 16 26 25 17 22 22 19 15 21 17 18 26 26 20 32 Use a = 0.05 to test whether there is a significant difference among the mean meal price for the three types of restaurants. State the null and alternative hypotheses. O Ho: Hitalian = HSeafood = Hsteakhouse H: Not all the population…arrow_forwardResearchers were interested in studying the relationship between living location (Manhattan vs. other boroughs of NYC) and anxiety. Researchers decided to randomly select 50 residents from Manhattan and 40 residents from the other four boroughs. All were free from anxiety disorders at the start of the study. They then followed the participants for three years to determine how many in each group developed an anxiety disorder. Among residents of Manhattan, 18 out of 50 developed an anxiety disorder. Among residents of the other four boroughs, 12 out of 40 developed an anxiety disorder. Question : The risk of developing an anxiety disorder for those living in Manhattan was _______ times the risk of developing an anxiety disorder for those living in the other boroughs.arrow_forwardIn Nigeria, with the monsoon, there was a drastic increase in cases of Malaria. Peniguillin is a medicine most used to treat cases of malaria. A secret report got leaked which showed the results of clinical trials of Peniquillin. Among the subjects treated with Peniguillin, 52 had nausea and 175 showed no symptoms of nausea. Among the other subjects were given placebos, 5 had nausea and 40 showed no symptoms of nausea. The lab sends its results to you to test for a difference between the rates of nausea for those treated with peniguillin and those given a placebo. The lab has few questions which you need to answer: 1) which hypothesis is the right OC? How about the conclusion, which box to choose? Choose :arrow_forward
- In a 2015 nationally-representative sample of youth in grades 9-12: 22.6% reported being in a physical fight in the 12 months preceding the survey; the prevalence was higher among males (28.4%) than females (16.5%). 16.2% reported carrying a weapon (gun, knife, or club) on one or more days in the 30 days preceding the survey; the prevalence was higher among males (24.3%) than females (7.5%). 5.3% reported carrying a gun on one or more days in the 30 days preceding the survey; the prevalence was higher among males (8.7%) than females (1.6%). Make an inference: What do these statistics reveal about teenagers and violence?arrow_forwardAn apartment management company wants to explore the consequences of allowing residents to have multiple dogs. They would like to find out whether the number of dogs predicts resident ratings. They would also like to control for the year the apartment complex was built because they know that might also affect the resident rating. They have collected data on several of their existing complexes. For each complex, they have counted the number of dogs currently living in the complex, the year the complex was built, and the average rating for that particular complex. They would like to perform a multiple regression on these variables to predict resident ratings. See data below: Multiple Dog Consideration Number of dogs Year of facility Rating (out of 5) 54 1975 2 31 1964 3.5 0 2015 4.8 11 2011 3.8 73 1964 2.3 23 2016 3.7 0 2015 4.7 49 1989 2.7 In this scenario, the y (dependent variable) is: Rating (out of 5) Number of Residents Number of Dogs Year of…arrow_forwardIn a research study, wherein the researcher wanted to know if people’s intelligence is perceived differently based on race, participants observed either a Caucasian, African American, or Asian American stimulus person giving a speech. All stimulus persons gave the same verbal speech. After observing this person, the participants had to rate the stimulus person’s level of intelligence on a scale of 1-10. The participants were separated by gender and their ratings were analyzed separately. How many possible interaction effects might the researcher find? Group of answer choices 3 0 1 2arrow_forward
- Infanticide - an ove... Twin Pairs Associates Degree J... Dr. Mindfog, is a drug researcher interested in investigating the mind-altering effects of two very potent drugs, scotch and tequila. Specifically, Dr. Mindfog wonders, "Is there a difference between the two drugs in their mind-altering effects?" Wishing to minimize and effects due to physical differences in groups of subjects, he selects ten adult twin pairs to participate in his study (five mail twin pairs and five female twin pairs, obviously matched). One member of each twin pair is randomly assigned to one of two groups, such that one member of a twin pair is in the "scotch" group and the other member of the twin pair is in the "tequila" group. Then, using the famous Olson Mind Dazedness Test (OMDT) he measures each participant's dazedness after self- administering three ounces of the drug within an hour's time. Below are the dazedness scores of Dr. Mindfog's experiment -- the higher the score, the more dazed the…arrow_forwardIn a previous practice assignment, you learned about a study in which volunteers (who were all around 30 years of age) from the Chicago area wore light sensors to measure their exposure to sunshine. It was found that those who experienced more daylight had lower body mass indexes (BMIs). The study was observational. It was not an experiment, so conclusions about cause and effect could not be made. Let's redesign the observational study described above into an experimental study.arrow_forwardIn the Preview for this Chapter, we discussed a study by McGee and Shevlin (2009) demonstrating that an individual’s sense of humor had a significant effect on how the individual was perceived by others. In one part of the study, female college students were given brief descriptions of a potential romantic partner. The fictitious male was described positively and, for one group of participants, the description also said that he had a great sense of humor. Another group of female students read the same description except it now said that he has no sense of humor. After reading the description, each participant was asked to rate the attractiveness of the man on a seven-point scale from 1 (very unattractive) to 7 (very attractive) with a score of 4 indicating a neutral rating. a. The females who read the “great sense of humor” description gave the potential partner an average attractiveness score of M = 4.53 with a standard deviation of s = 1.04. If the sample consisted of n = 16…arrow_forward
- New research on the effects of social media usage has been mixed. Some studies have found that social media helps people stay connected to others, and can be a positive source of social support. Other studies have found that social media makes people feel lonely and unhappy. I decide to do my own study to see whether social media has an effect on how many close friends people have. I conduct an internet survey of 1000 people and ask them how many hours a week they spend on social media and how many close friends they have. In the study respondents spent 10 hours a week using social media, and had 4 close friends, on average. The standard deviations for social media usage and close friends were 4 hours and 2 friends, respectively. The correlation (r) between social media and friends was -.3.arrow_forwardCan you answer #1 and #2 pleasearrow_forwardA clinical psychologist wants to test the effectiveness of three new therapies that have been developed for reducing anxiety symptoms. The researcher recruits 15 participants and randomly assigns them to take part in Therapy A, Therapy B, or Therapy C for a month. At the end of the month, the researcher measures the participants' anxiety symptoms on a scale from 1 to 10 (where a higher score means more anxiety symptoms). The participants' scores are shown below: What is the appropriate test to use ? 3. What are the null and alternative hypotheses ? 4. Using a two-tailed alpha of .05, determine what the critical value is 5. Calculate the test statistic 6. State whether you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis for the omnibus test 7. Calculate and report the effect size for the omnibus test 8. Perform a Post-Hoc Test. Report the significance of each pairwise comparisonarrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman