Your firm spends $500,000 per year (end of the year payment) in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the COVID-19 economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next three years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $2 million in year 4 (end of the year payment) replacing failed equipment. Can IRR be applied in this decision? For what MARR is forgoing maintenance a good decision?

Your firm spends $500,000 per year (end of the year payment) in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the COVID-19 economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next three years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $2 million in year 4 (end of the year payment) replacing failed equipment. Can IRR be applied in this decision? For what MARR is forgoing maintenance a good decision?

Financial Accounting Intro Concepts Meth/Uses

14th Edition

ISBN:9781285595047

Author:Weil

Publisher:Weil

Chapter10: Long-lived Tangible And Intangible Assets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Your firm spends $403,000 per year in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next 3 years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $2.1 million in year 4 replacing failed equipment. a. What is the IRR of the decision to forgo maintenance of the equipment? b. Does the IRR rule work for this decision? c. For what costs of capital (COC) is forgoing maintenance a good decision? a. What is the IRR of the decision to forgo maintenance of the equipment? The IRR of the decision is%. (Round to two decimal places.)
Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $18,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and have an expected life of 5 years. Carlisle’s MARR is 10%/year. Solve a. What is the annual worth of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on annual worth? c. Is the filter economically justified?
A design firm is considering investing in a software suite that costs $200,000. It estimates that the software will allow it to better present its design ideas and generate an additional revenue of $70,000 per year for each of the next 4 years. At the end of those 4 years, the firm will need to upgrade its software and the software suite would have negligible salvage value. Due to changes in the economy, the design firm is reevaluating its MARR - it is not sure whether it should be 9%, 12%, or 14%. Calculate the present worth at each of these MARRS, and determine for which values of the MARR the investment will be economically justified. Click here to access the TVM Factor Table calculator. PW(9%): 2$ PW(12%): $ PW(14%): Justified when MARR is %. Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answers for the PWs to a whole number and for the IRR to 1 decimal place. The tolerance is ±20 for the PWs and ±0.2 for the IRR.
The management of Penfold Corporation is considering the purchase of a machine that would cost $390,000, would last for 7 years, and would have no salvage value. The machine would reduce labor and other costs by $74,000 per year. The company requires a minimum pretax return of 12% on all investment projects. Click here to view Exhibit 7B-1 and Exhibit 7B-2 to determine the appropriate discount factor(s) using the tables provided. The net present value of the proposed project is closest to (Ignore income taxes.): (Round your intermediate calculations and final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)
Assume that a company is considering purchasing a machine for $100,000 that will have a seven-year useful life and no salvage value. The machine will lower operating costs by $18,000 per year. The company also expects this investment to provide qualitative benefits that it is struggling to incorporate into its financial analysis. Assuming the company's required rate of return is 17% and the net present value of the investment before considering the qualitative benefits is $(29,404), the minimum dollar value per year that must be provided by the machine's qualitative benefits to justify the $100,000 investment is closest to: Multiple Choice O O о O $7,787. $8,247. $7,497. $8,067.
Your firm spends $509,000 per year in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next 3 years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $1.9 million in year 4 replacing failed equipment. For what costs of capital (COC) is forgoing maintenance a good decision? O When cost of capital 8% O When cost of capital > 11%
Carlisle Company has been cited and must invest in equipment to reduce stack emissions or face EPA fines of $18,500 per year. An emission reduction filter will cost $75,000 and have an expected life of 5 years. Carlisle’s MARR is 10%/yr. Solve, a. What is the internal rate of return of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on internal rate of return? c. Is the filter economically justified?
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing an additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV with and without mitigation. Show the workings
A construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calulate the Payback with and without mitgationwhat is the discounted payback with and without mitigation?Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation? (hint: discuss all the criterias you have calculated in earlier parts)How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated
The garden supply company is also considering taking out a loan and buying a small truck to save costs on deliveries. The truck costs $60000 and is expected to earn end of year after tax net cash inflows of $11000, $17000, $20000 and $20000 for the next four years before it wears out sufficiently to be unreliable and must be sold for an estimated $18000 (after tax). a) Calculate the NPV of the truck if the interest rate on the loan is 4.0% pa. b) Calculate the NPV of the truck if the interest rate on the loan is 10.7% pa. c) Advise management of your recommendation regarding purchase of the truck based on your NPV calculations. d) Calculate the accounting rate of return on the truck investment. e) What additional advice would you give management if the required payback period was three years?
A firm is considering purchasing equipment that will reduce cost by P400,000. The equipment costs P300,000 and has a salvage value of P50,000 and a life of 7 years. The annual maintenance cost is P6,000. While not in use by the firm, the equipment can be rented to others to generate an income of P10,000 per year. If money can be invested for an 8 per cent return, is the firm justified in buying the equipment?