An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. The treatment will cost $30,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the costs to decline by $3,000 each year. As a alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for the fixed price of $15,000/year throughout the 15 year period, payable at the beginning of each year. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 15 years. Use the annual worth method determine how the wastes should be processed. The company's MARR is 12% A Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 12% per year. The AW of the in-house treatment is S (Round to the nearest dollar) The AW of the outside treatment is S (Round to the nearest dollar.)

An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. The treatment will cost $30,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the costs to decline by $3,000 each year. As a alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for the fixed price of $15,000/year throughout the 15 year period, payable at the beginning of each year. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 15 years. Use the annual worth method determine how the wastes should be processed. The company's MARR is 12% A Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 12% per year. The AW of the in-house treatment is S (Round to the nearest dollar) The AW of the outside treatment is S (Round to the nearest dollar.)

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter10: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria And Real Option

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 14P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Mallette Manufacturing, Inc., produces washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers. Because of increasing competition, Mallette is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. Since competition is most keen for dishwashers, the production process for this line has been selected for initial evaluation. The automated system for the dishwasher line would replace an existing system (purchased one year ago for 6 million). Although the existing system will be fully depreciated in nine years, it is expected to last another 10 years. The automated system would also have a useful life of 10 years. The existing system is capable of producing 100,000 dishwashers per year. Sales and production data using the existing system are provided by the Accounting Department: All cash expenses with the exception of depreciation, which is 6 per unit. The existing equipment is being depreciated using straight-line with no salvage value considered. The automated system will cost 34 million to purchase, plus an estimated 20 million in software and implementation. (Assume that all investment outlays occur at the beginning of the first year.) If the automated equipment is purchased, the old equipment can be sold for 3 million. The automated system will require fewer parts for production and will produce with less waste. Because of this, the direct material cost per unit will be reduced by 25 percent. Automation will also require fewer support activities, and as a consequence, volume-related overhead will be reduced by 4 per unit and direct fixed overhead (other than depreciation) by 17 per unit. Direct labor is reduced by 60 percent. Assume, for simplicity, that the new investment will be depreciated on a pure straight-line basis for tax purposes with no salvage value. Ignore the half-life convention. The firms cost of capital is 12 percent, but management chooses to use 20 percent as the required rate of return for evaluation of investments. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. Required: 1. Compute the net present value for the old system and the automated system. Which system would the company choose? 2. Repeat the net present value analysis of Requirement 1, using 12 percent as the discount rate. 3. Upon seeing the projected sales for the old system, the marketing manager commented: Sales of 100,000 units per year cannot be maintained in the current competitive environment for more than one year unless we buy the automated system. The automated system will allow us to compete on the basis of quality and lead time. If we keep the old system, our sales will drop by 10,000 units per year. Repeat the net present value analysis, using this new information and a 12 percent discount rate. 4. An industrial engineer for Mallette noticed that salvage value for the automated equipment had not been included in the analysis. He estimated that the equipment could be sold for 4 million at the end of 10 years. He also estimated that the equipment of the old system would have no salvage value at the end of 10 years. Repeat the net present value analysis using this information, the information in Requirement 3, and a 12 percent discount rate. 5. Given the outcomes of the previous four requirements, comment on the importance of providing accurate inputs for assessing investments in automated manufacturing systems.
After discovering a new gold vein in the Colorado mountains, CTC Mining Corporation must decide whether to go ahead and develop the deposit. The most cost-effective method of mining gold is sulfuric acid extraction, a process that could result in environmental damage. Before proceeding with the extraction, CTC must spend 900,000 for new mining equipment and pay 165,000 for its installation. The mined gold will net the firm an estimated 350,000 each year for the 5-year life of the vein. CTCs cost of capital is 14%. For the purposes of this problem, assume that the cash inflows occur at the end of the year. a. What are the projects NPV and IRR? b. Should this project be undertaken if environmental impacts were not a consideration? c. How should environmental effects be considered when evaluating this or any other project? How might these concepts affect the decision in part b?
Dauten is offered a replacement machine which has a cost of 8,000, an estimated useful life of 6 years, and an estimated salvage value of 800. The replacement machine is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation at the time of purchase- The replacement machine would permit an output expansion, so sales would rise by 1,000 per year; even so, the new machines much greater efficiency would cause operating expenses to decline by 1,500 per year The new machine would require that inventories be increased by 2,000, but accounts payable would simultaneously increase by 500. Dautens marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 25%, and its WACC is 11%. Should it replace the old machine?
Although the Chen Company’s milling machine is old, it is still in relatively good working order and would last for another 10 years. It is inefficient compared to modern standards, though, and so the company is considering replacing it. The new milling machine, at a cost of $110,000 delivered and installed, would also last for 10 years and would produce after-tax cash flows (labor savings and depreciation tax savings) of $19,000 per year. It would have zero salvage value at the end of its life. The project cost of capital is 10%, and its marginal tax rate is 25%. Should Chen buy the new machine?
More Info Fund Series Amount Factor Recovery Factor Present Amount Factor Present Worth Factor Present Worth Factor Factor Worth Factor Factor ToFind A Given P To Find F To Find P Given G P/G To Find A Given G To Find F To Find A Given F To Find P To Find P Given P Given F Given A Given A F/P P/F FIA PIA A/F A/P A/G 1.0500 0.9524 1.0000 0.9524 1.0000 1.0500 0.0000 0.0000 1.1025 0.9070 2.0500 0.4878 0.3172 1.8594 0.5378 0.9070 0.4878 al 3 1.1576 0.8638 3.1525 2.7232 0.3672 2.6347 0.9675 4. 1.2155 0.8227 4.3101 3.5460 0.2320 0.2820 5.1028 1.4391 1.2763 0.7835 5.5256 4.3295 0.1810 0.2310 8.2369 1.9025 6. 1.3401 0.7462 6.8019 5.0757 0.1470 0.1970 11.9680 2.3579 1.4071 0.7107 8.1420 5.7864 0.1228 0.1728 16.2321 2.8052 8. 1.4775 0.6768 9.5491 6.4632 0.1047 0.1547 20.9700 3.2445 1.5513 0.6446 11.0266 7.1078 0.0907 0.1407 26.1268 3.6758 10 1.6289 0.6139 12.5779 7.7217 0.0795 0.1295 31.6520 4.0991 11 1.7103 0.5847 14.2068 8.3064 0.0704 0.1204 37.4988 4.5144 12 1.7959 0.5568 15.9171 8.8633…
An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. The treatment will cost $30,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the costs to decline by $3,000 each year. As an alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for the fixed price of $15,000/year throughout the 12 year period, payable at the beginning of each year. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 12 years. Use the annual worth method to determine how the wastes should be processed. The company's MARR is 5%. a) The AW of the in-house treatment is $ ? b) The AW of the outside treatment is $ ? c) The ? processing is the most economical alternative.
An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. The treatment will cost $30,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the costs to decline by $3,000 each year. As an alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for the fixed price of $15,000/year throughout the 10-year period, payable at the beginning of each year. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 10 years. Use the annual worth method to determine how the wastes should be processed. The company’s MARR is 10%.
An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. The treatment will cost $20,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the costs to decline by $2,000 each year. As an alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for the fixed price of $10,000/year throughout the 9 year period, payable at the beginning of each year. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 9 years. Use the annual worth method to determine how the wastes should be processed. The company's MARR is 10%.
An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. In-house treatment will have an annual cost of $20,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the annual cost to decline by $2,000 each subsequent year. As an alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for an initial cost of $10,500 and an annual fixed price of $8,500/year throughout the 11 year period. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 11 years. Using the AW method, calculate the equivalent uniform annual cost (EUAC) of each alternative and determine how the waste should be processed. The company's MARR is 12%. Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 12% per year. The EUAC for in-house treatment is $ positive cash flow.) The EUAC for outside treatment is S positive cash flow.) The most economical alternative is O A. outside treatment B. in-house treatment…
Aerotron Electronics is considering the purchase of a water filtration system to assist in circuit board manufacturing. The system costs $40,000. It has an expected life of 7 years at which time its salvage value will be $7,500. Operating and maintenance expenses are estimated to be $2,000 per year. If the filtration system is not purchased, Aerotron Electronics will have to pay Bay City $12,000 per year for water purification. If the system is purchased, no water purification from Bay City will be needed. Aerotron Electronics must borrow half of the purchase price, but they cannot start repaying the loan for 2 years. The bank has agreed to three equal annual payments, with the first payment due at end of year 2. The loan interest rate is 8% compounded annually. Aerotron Electronics’ MARR is 10% compounded annually. Solve, a. What is the internal rate of return of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on internal rate of…
Aerotron Electronics is considering the purchase of a water filtration system to assist in circuit board manufacturing. The system costs $40,000. It has an expected life of 7 years at which time its salvage value will be $7,500. Operating and maintenance expenses are estimated to be $2,000 per year. If the filtration system is not purchased, Aerotron Electronics will have to pay Bay City $12,000 per year for water purification. If the system is purchased, no water purification from Bay City will be needed. Aerotron Electronics must borrow half of the purchase price, but it cannot start repaying the loan for 2 years. The bank has agreed to three equal annual payments, with the first payment due at the end of year 2. The loan interest rate is 8% compounded annually. Aerotron Electronics’ MARR is 10% compounded annually. Solve, a. What is the annual worth of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on annual worth? c. Should…
Aerotron Electronics is considering the purchase of a water filtration system to assist in circuit board manufacturing. The system costs $220,000. It has an expected life of 7 years at which time its salvage value will be $7,500. Operating and maintenance expenses are estimated to be $13,000 per year. If the filtration system is not purchased, Aerotron Electronics will have to pay Bay City $42,000 per year for water purification. If the system is purchased, no water purification from Bay City will be needed. Aerotron Electronics must borrow 1/2 of the purchase price, but they cannot start repaying the loan for 2 years. The bank has agreed to 3 equal annual payments, with the 1st payment due at the end of year 2. The loan interest rate is 8% compounded annually. Aerotron Electronics' MARR is 10% compounded annually. Part a What is the annual worth of this investment? $