Suppose you identify 50 possible investments whose payoffs are completely independent of one another. All the investments have the same expected value and standard deviation. You have $5,000 to invest. In terms of risk, would the benefit of spreading your $5,000 across all 50 investments be the same, greater, or smaller compared with dividing your funds between just two investments? OYes. The gains from spreading your investments would be larger if you spread the $5,000 across 50 investments. No. Because in this case diversification does not help to spread risk, it doesn't matter how many investments you spread your $5,000 across. No. Because the payoffs from these investments are independent, it doesn't matter how many investments you spread your $5,000 across, as there is no benefit in terms of reduced risk. O Yes. Becouse the payoffs from these investments are negatively correlated with one another, spreading your $5.000 across a larger number of investments reduces your risk.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
5th Edition
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Chapter17: Making Decisions With Uncertainty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 17.2IP
icon
Related questions
Question
Suppose you identify 50 possible investments whose payoffs are completely independent of one another. All the investments have the
same expected value and standard deviation. You have $5,000 to invest. In terms of risk, would the benefit of spreading your $5,000
across all 50 investments be the same, greater, or smaller compared with dividing your funds between just two investments?
OYes. The gains from spreading your investments would be larger if you spread the $5000 across 50 investments.
No. Because in this case diversification does not help to spread risk, it doesn't matter how many investments you spread your
$5,000 across.
No. Because the payoffs from these investments are independent, it doesn't matter how many investments you spread your
$5,000 across, as there is no benefit in terms of reduced risk.
O Yes. Because the payoffs from these investments are negatively correlated with one another, spreading your $5,000 across a
targer number of investments reduces your risk.
Transcribed Image Text:Suppose you identify 50 possible investments whose payoffs are completely independent of one another. All the investments have the same expected value and standard deviation. You have $5,000 to invest. In terms of risk, would the benefit of spreading your $5,000 across all 50 investments be the same, greater, or smaller compared with dividing your funds between just two investments? OYes. The gains from spreading your investments would be larger if you spread the $5000 across 50 investments. No. Because in this case diversification does not help to spread risk, it doesn't matter how many investments you spread your $5,000 across. No. Because the payoffs from these investments are independent, it doesn't matter how many investments you spread your $5,000 across, as there is no benefit in terms of reduced risk. O Yes. Because the payoffs from these investments are negatively correlated with one another, spreading your $5,000 across a targer number of investments reduces your risk.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning