Jason parked his car on a hill, but failed to set his parking brakes. The car rolled down the hill and hit another car, damaging it significantly. The owner of the other car, Yang, filed a lawsuit of negligence against Jason, who pledged that he had no intention of damaging anybody's property and that he shouldn't be made to compensate. Discuss the methods the court and the jury could use to arrive at a fair decision

Jason parked his car on a hill, but failed to set his parking brakes. The car rolled down the hill and hit another car, damaging it significantly. The owner of the other car, Yang, filed a lawsuit of negligence against Jason, who pledged that he had no intention of damaging anybody's property and that he shouldn't be made to compensate. Discuss the methods the court and the jury could use to arrive at a fair decision

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Deborah McCullough bought a new car from Bill Swad Chrysler, Inc. The car was protected by both a limited warranty and an extended warranty. McCullough immediately encountered problems with the automobile’s brakes, transmission, and air conditioning and discovered a number of cosmetic defects as well. She returned the car to Swad for repairs, but Swad did not fix the brakes properly or perform any of the cosmetic work. Moreover, new problems appeared with respect to the car’s steering mechanism. McCullough returned the car twice more for repairs, but on each occasion, old problems persisted and new ones emerged. After the engine abruptly shut off on a short trip away from home and the brakes again failed on a more extensive excursion, McCullough presented Swad with a list of thirty-two of the car’s defects and demanded their correction. When Swad failed to remedy more than a few of the problems, McCullough wrote a letter to Swad calling for rescission of the purchase agreement and a…
A chemical processing company stored toxic waste on its premises. A severe storm caused damaged to the containers storing the waste, which resulted in the spill contaminating nearby pond, which belongs to Sam. The chemical processing company was careful when storing the waste and no allegation of negligence is made. However, Sam claims that the chemical processing company is liable for the pond contamination, even though there is no negligence. Is Sam correct? Explain
Sanderson drives a delivery truck for Jim’s Wholesale Foods. As Sanderson is on his way to a local delivery, he rear-ends Sarah’s car. Sanderson immediately gets out of the delivery truck to assist Sarah. Sanderson tells Sarah that he did not intend to hit her and that he is very sorry. Sarah’s car is totaled, and Sarah is taken to the hospital with extensive injuries. Once Sarah is discharged from the hospital, she visits an attorney to discuss her options. Sarah’s attorney advises her that she can sue: a) Jim’s Wholesale Foods only. b) no one, because the accident was not intentional. c) both Sanderson and Jim’s Wholesale Foods.
John Campbell, an employee of Manhattan Construction Company, claims to have injured his back as a result of a fall while repairing the roof at one of the Eastview apartment buildings. He filed a lawsuit against Doug Reynolds, the owner of Eastview Apartments, asking for damages of $1,500,000. John claims that the roof had rotten sections and that his fall could have been prevented if Mr. Reynolds had told Manhattan Construction about the problem. Mr. Reynolds notified his insurance company, Allied Insurance, of the lawsuit. Allied must defend Mr. Reynolds and decide what action to take regarding the lawsuit.Some depositions and a series of discussions took place between both sides. As a result, John Campbell offered to accept a settlement of $750,000. Thus, one option is for Allied to pay John $750,000 to settle the claim. Allied is also considering making John a counteroffer of $400,000 in the hope that he will accept a lesser amount to avoid the time and cost of going to trial.…
Joseph Eugene Dodson, age sixteen, purchased a used pickup truck from Burns and Mary Shrader. The Shraders owned and operated Shrader’s Auto Sales. Dodson paid $14,900 in cash for the truck. At the time of sale, the Shraders did not question Dodson’s age, but thought he was eighteen or nineteen. Dodson made no misrepresentation concerning his age. Nine months after the date of purchase, the truck began to develop mechanical problems. A mechanic diagnosed the problem as a burnt valve but could not be certain. Dodson, who could not afford the repairs, continued to drive the truck until one month later, when the engine “blew up.” Dodson parked the vehicle in the front yard of his parents’ home and contacted the Shraders to rescind the purchase of the truck and to request a full refund. a. What arguments would support Dodson’s termination of the contract? b. What arguments would support Shrader’s position that the contract is not voidable? c. Which side should prevail? Explain.
Pattie purchases a couch from Good Stuff, Inc., to use in her home. She pays for the couch, and Good Stuff agrees to deliver it. Unfortunately, on the way to her house, the delivery truck overheats and burns, destroying the truck and the couch inside. Pattie asks for a refund or another couch. Good Stuff’s owner refuses. If Pattie decides to sue Good Stuff, which party is likely to prevail? Explain. (In your answer, be sure to identify and discuss which law(s) might apply and how that could affect the outcome.)
Barbara Rome entered Flower Memorial Hospital to undergo a series of X-rays. When she was ready for the X-rays, she was assisted by a student radiological intern. The intern placed Rome on the X-ray table and strapped her onto the table correctly; however, the intern did not properly fasten the footboard, which was located at the foot of the table. As a result of this error, Rome fell and was hurt when the table was raised. As a consequence, Rome brought a lawsuit against Flower Memorial Hospital, alleging that the ordinary negligence of the intern had caused her injury. In contrast, the hospital argued that the lawsuit involved a medical claim, as defined under the state’s medical malpractice statute. Whether a case involves ordinary negligence or a medical claim would determine whether the state’s two-year statute of limitations for negligence or the state’s one-year statute of limitations for medical claims would apply. This case clearly involves a difference of opinion on the…
Mr. James was running on a treadmill at the local at Average Joe's health club. Mr. James was running faster than usual and fell and hit his head on the moving treadmill belt and hit his back and legs on equipment that was approximately 3 feet from the back of the treadmill. The equipment that Mr. James hit is back and legs on is moveable equipment and should have been picked up by the fitness floor attendant. Make an argument for the plaintiff (Mr. James) based on the four elements of negligence.
Martha invites John to come to lunch. Though she knows that her private road is dangerous to travel, having been heavily eroded by recent rains, Martha doesn’t warn John of the condition, reasonably believing that he will notice the deep ruts and exercise sufficient care. While John is driving over, his attention is diverted from the road by the screaming of his child, who has been stung by a bee. He fails to notice the condition of the road, hits a rut, and skids into a tree. If John is not contributorily negligent, is Martha liable to John?
The manager of Palms Restaurant assembles all employees and announces that because theft isoccurring, she would fire employees until the guilty party confessed. Turning to an employee, Alice, themanager says, "You're fired." Palms Restaurant is in an employment-at-will state. Discuss if Alice has anylegal remedy against Palms.
Pauline Brown was shot and seriously injured by an unknown assailant in the parking lot of National Supermarkets. Pauline and George Brown brought a negligence action against National, Sentry Security Agency, and T. G. Watkins, a security guard and Sentry employee. Sentry had a security contract with National. The Browns maintained that the defendants have a legal duty to protect National’s customers both in the store and in the parking lot, and that this duty was breached. The defendants denied this allegation. What will the Browns have to prove to prevail? Explain.
A contract contained a clause requiring arbitration of disputes. During progress of the work, a serious fire occurred. The owner and contractor could not agree upon the size of, and responsibility for, the resultant damages; therefore, the owner brought suit against the contractor. Is this proper procedure? Will the court be likely to hear the case?