A new factory manager was hired for a company that was experiencing slow production rates and lower production volumes than demanded by management. Upon investigation, the manager found that the workers were poorly motivated and not closely supervised. Midway through the quarter, an incentive program was initiated, and cash bonuses were given when workers hit their production targets. Within a short time, production output increased, but th bonuses had to be charged to the direct labor budget. This could produce an A. unfavorable direct materials cost variance B. unfavorable direct labor cost variance OC. unfavorable direct materials efficiency variance OD. unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance

A new factory manager was hired for a company that was experiencing slow production rates and lower production volumes than demanded by management. Upon investigation, the manager found that the workers were poorly motivated and not closely supervised. Midway through the quarter, an incentive program was initiated, and cash bonuses were given when workers hit their production targets. Within a short time, production output increased, but th bonuses had to be charged to the direct labor budget. This could produce an A. unfavorable direct materials cost variance B. unfavorable direct labor cost variance OC. unfavorable direct materials efficiency variance OD. unfavorable direct labor efficiency variance

Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337912020

Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Chapter14: The Balanced Scorecard And Corporate Social Responsibility

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3BE: Moses Moonrocks Inc. has developed a balanced scorecard with a measure map that suggests that the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The salespeople at Larkspur, a notebook manufacturer, commonly pressured operations managers to keep costs down so the company could give bigger discounts to large customers. David, the operations supervisor, leaked the $0.80 total unit cost to salespeople, who were thrilled, since that was slightly lower than the previous year's unit cost. Budgets were not yet finalized for the upcoming year, so it was unclear what the target unit cost would be. David knew the current year's operating capacity was two million notebooks, and Larkspur produced and sold just that many. The detailed breakdown of the $0.80 total unit cost is as follows. Direct material Direct labor Variable overhead Fixed overhead Total cost per unit $0.05 0.20 0.15 0.40 $0.80
The salespeople at Metlock, a notebook manufacturer, commonly pressured operations managers to keep costs down so the company could give bigger discounts to large customers. Richard, the operations supervisor, leaked the $0.65 total unit cost to salespeople, who were thrilled, since that was slightly lower than the previous year's unit cost. Budgets were not yet finalized for the upcoming year, so it was unclear what the target unit cost would be. Richard knew the current year's operating capacity was two million notebooks, and Metlock produced and sold just that many. The detailed breakdown of the $0.65 total unit cost is as follows. Direct material Direct labor Variable overhead Fixed overhead Total cost per unit (a) (b) Total fixed costs Gross margin Your answer is correct. What were Metlock's total fixed costs? If the average selling price was $2.10, how much gross margin did the company generate? $0.15 Fixed costs 0.15 Total cost per unit 0.15 Gross margin 0.20 $0.65 Save for…
The salespeople at Ayayai, a notebook manufacturer, commonly pressured operations managers to keep costs down so the company could give bigger discounts to large customers. Kenneth, the operations supervisor, leaked the $1.20 total unit cost to salespeople, who were thrilled, since that was slightly lower than the previous year's unit cost. Budgets were not yet finalized for the upcoming year, so it was unclear what the target unit cost would be. Kenneth knew the current year's operating capacity was two million notebooks, and Ayayai produced and sold just that many. The detailed breakdown of the $1.20 total unit cost is as follows. Direct material Direct labor Variable overhead Fixed overhead Total cost per unit (a) Total fixed costs Gross margin tA $ $0.10 What were Ayayai's total fixed costs? If the average selling price was $1.95, how much gross margin did the company generate? LA 0.25 0.05 0.80 $1.20
A cost analyst showed the company president a graph that portrayed the firm’s utility cost as semivariable. The president criticized the graph by saying, “This fixed-cost component doesn’t look right to me. If we shut down the plant for six months, we wouldn’t incur half of these costs.” How should the cost analyst respond?
The manager of a retail shop is awarded a bonus if his shop stays within the quarterly budget. Often times, the manager will schedule hourly employees less or not purchase inventory until the next quarter in order to make sure the shop stays within budget. Discuss why or (why not) this an ethical issue and who could be impacted by the manager's actions. In addition, how could this impact the performance measurements of the retail shop?
Eastern Auto Parts Company manufactures replacement parts for automobile repair. The company recently installed a flexible manufacturing system, which has significantly changed the production pro-cess. The installation of the new FMS was not anticipated when the current year’s budget and cost struc-ture were developed. The installation of the new equipment was hastened by several major breakdowns in the company’s old production machinery. The new equipment was very expensive, but management expects it to cut the labor time required by a substantial amount. Management also expects the new equipment to allow a reduction in direct-material waste. On the negative side, the FMS requires a more highly skilled labor force to operate it than the company’s old equipment. The following cost variance report was prepared for the month of July, the first full month after the equipment was installed. EASTERN AUTO PARTS COMPANY Cost Variance Report for the Month of July Direct material: Standard cost…
Sanchez Trucking has been experiencing delays at its warehouse operations. Management hired a consultant to find out why service deliveries to local businesses have taken longer than they should. The consultant narrowed down the problem to the number of work crews loading and unloading trucks. Each crew consists of 7 employees who work as a team on a variety of tasks; each employee works a full 40 hours a week. However, costs are also a concern. The consultant advised management that they could supplement work crews with short-term employees, at a higher cost, to cover unexpected needs on a weekly basis. Each work crew permanently hired by Sanchez costs $3,500 per week in wages and benefits, while a crew of short-term employees costs $6,000 per week. Complicating the decision is the fact that the weekly hourly requirements for work crews is uncertain because of the volatility in the number of deliveries to be made. Deliberating with management, the consultant arrived at the following…
Stacy Cummins, the newly hired controller at Merced Home Products, Inc., was disturbed by what she haddiscovered about the standard costs at the Home Security Division. In looking over the past several yearsof quarterly income statements at the Home Security Division, she noticed that the first-quarter profits were always poor, the second-quarter profits were slightly better, the third- quarter profits were againslightly better, and the fourth quarter always ended with a spectacular performance in which the HomeSecurity Division managed to meet or exceed its target profit for the year. She also was concerned to findletters from the company’s external auditors to top management warning about an unusual use of standardcosts at the Home Security Division.When Ms. Cummins ran across these letters, she asked the assistant controller, Gary Farber, if he knewwhat was going on at the Home Security Division. Gary said that it was common knowledge in the companythat the vice president in charge…
Steve Morgan, controller for Newton Industries, was reviewing production cost reports for the year. One amount in these reports continued in to bother him – advertising. During the year the company had instituted an expensive advertisement campaign to sell some of its slower-moving products. It was still too early to tell whether the advertising campaign was successful. There had been much internal debate as how to report advertising cost. The vice president of finance argued that advertising costs should be reported as cost of production, just like direct material and direct labor. He therefore recommended that this cost be identified as manufacturing overhead and reported as part of inventory costs until sold. Others disagreed. Morgan believed that this cost should be reported as an expense of the current period, so as not to overstate net income. Others argued that it should be reported as prepaid advertising and reported as a current asset. The president finally had to decide…
Kimball Company has developed the following cost formulas: Materialusage:Ym=80X;r=0.95Laborusage(direct):Yl=20X;r=0.96Overheadactivity:Yo=350,000+100X;r=0.75Sellingactivity:Ys=50,000+10X;r=0.93 where X=Directlaborhours The company has a policy of producing on demand and keeps very little, if any, finished goods inventory (thus, units produced equals units sold). Each unit uses one direct labor hour for production. The president of Kimball Company has recently implemented a policy that any special orders will be accepted if they cover the costs that the orders cause. This policy was implemented because Kimballs industry is in a recession and the company is producing well below capacity (and expects to continue doing so for the coming year). The president is willing to accept orders that minimally cover their variable costs so that the company can keep its employees and avoid layoffs. Also, any orders above variable costs will increase overall profitability of the company. Required: 1. Compute the total unit variable cost. Suppose that Kimball has an opportunity to accept an order for 20,000 units at 220 per unit. Should Kimball accept the order? (The order would not displace any of Kimballs regular orders.) 2. Explain the significance of the coefficient of correlation measures for the cost formulas. Did these measures have a bearing on your answer in Requirement 1? Should they have a bearing? Why or why not? 3. Suppose that a multiple regression equation is developed for overhead costs: Y = 100,000 + 100X1 + 5,000X2 + 300X3, where X1 = direct labor hours, X2 = number of setups, and X3 = engineering hours. The coefficient of determination for the equation is 0.94. Assume that the order of 20,000 units requires 12 setups and 600 engineering hours. Given this new information, should the company accept the special order referred to in Requirement 1? Is there any other information about cost behavior that you would like to have? Explain.
Kelly Gray, production manager, was upset with the latest performance report, which indicated that she was 100,000 over budget. Given the efforts that she and her workers had made, she was confident that they had met or beat the budget. Now, she was not only upset but also genuinely puzzled over the results. Three itemsdirect labor, power, and setupswere over budget. The actual costs for these three items follow: Kelly knew that her operation had produced more units than originally had been budgeted, so more power and labor had naturally been used. She also knew that the uncertainty in scheduling had led to more setups than planned. When she pointed this out to John Huang, the controller, he assured her that the budgeted costs had been adjusted for the increase in productive activity. Curious, Kelly questioned John about the methods used to make the adjustment. JOHN: If the actual level of activity differs from the original planned level, we adjust the budget by using budget formulasformulas that allow us to predict what the costs will be for different levels of activity. KELLY: The approach sounds reasonable. However, Im sure something is wrong here. Tell me exactly how you adjusted the costs of labor, power, and setups. JOHN: First, we obtain formulas for the individual items in the budget by using the method of least squares. We assume that cost variations can be explained by variations in productive activity where activity is measured by direct labor hours. Here is a list of the cost formulas for the three items you mentioned. The variable X is the number of direct labor hours: Labor cost = 10X Power cost = 5,000 + 4X Setup cost = 100,000 KELLY: I think I see the problem. Power costs dont have a lot to do with direct labor hours. They have more to do with machine hours. As production increases, machine hours increase more rapidly than direct labor hours. Also, ... JOHN: You know, you have a point. The coefficient of determination for power cost is only about 50 percent. That leaves a lot of unexplained cost variation. The coefficient for labor, however, is much betterit explains about 96 percent of the cost variation. Setup costs, of course, are fixed. KELLY: Well, as I was about to say, setup costs also have very little to do with direct labor hours. And I might add that they certainly are not fixedat least not all of them. We had to do more setups than our original plan called for because of the scheduling changes. And we have to pay our people when they work extra hours. It seems as if we are always paying overtime. I wonder if we simply do not have enough people for the setup activity. Supplies are used for each setup, and these are not cheap. Did you build these extra costs of increased setup activity into your budget? JOHN: No, we assumed that setup costs were fixed. I see now that some of them could vary as the number of setups increases. Kelly, let me see if I can develop some cost formulas based on better explanatory variables. Ill get back with you in a few days. Assume that after a few days work, John developed the following cost formulas, all with a coefficient of determination greater than 90 percent: Labor cost = 10X; where X = Direct labor hours Power cost = 68,000 + 0.9Y; where Y = Machine hours Setup cost = 98,000 + 400Z; where Z = Number of setups The actual measures of each of the activity drivers are as follows: Required: 1. Prepare a performance report for direct labor, power, and setups using the direct-labor-based formulas. 2. Prepare a performance report for direct labor, power, and setups using the multiple cost driver formulas that John developed. 3. Of the two approaches, which provides the most accurate picture of Kellys performance? Why? 4. After reviewing the approach to performance measurement, a consultant remarked that non-value-added cost trend reports would be a much better performance measurement approach than comparing actual costs with budgeted costseven if activity flexible budgets were used. Do you agree or disagree? Explain.
Moses Moonrocks Inc. has developed a balanced scorecard with a measure map that suggests that the number of erroneous shipments has a direct effect on operating profit. The company estimates that every shipment error leads to a reduction of revenue by 3,000 and increased costs of about 2,000. If the company has the following budgeted sales and costs for next month (without accounting for any possible shipping errors), determine how many shipping errors the company can afford to have and still break even: