1.Which of the following pertains to an efficient supply chain? A)It deals with innovative products B)The product life cycle will be short C)It is worthwhile to invest in good forecasting systems D)All of the above 2.Which of the following costs do not come under inventory carrying cost calculation? A)Investment in a software for updating stock position online B)Investment in stores space C)Salaries of procurement personnel D)Cost of maintaining the inventory stocks 3.Which of the following will have lesser bullwhip effect in a supply chain? A)Supply Chain co-ordination B)Opening more stocking points closer to the point of consumption C)Empowering the lower echelons of the inventory to take decisions on fulfilling the demand D)All of the above

1.Which of the following pertains to an efficient supply chain? A)It deals with innovative products B)The product life cycle will be short C)It is worthwhile to invest in good forecasting systems D)All of the above 2.Which of the following costs do not come under inventory carrying cost calculation? A)Investment in a software for updating stock position online B)Investment in stores space C)Salaries of procurement personnel D)Cost of maintaining the inventory stocks 3.Which of the following will have lesser bullwhip effect in a supply chain? A)Supply Chain co-ordination B)Opening more stocking points closer to the point of consumption C)Empowering the lower echelons of the inventory to take decisions on fulfilling the demand D)All of the above

Marketing

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357033791

Author:Pride, William M

Publisher:Pride, William M

Chapter19: Pricing Concepts

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6DRQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. Is Ben Gibson acting legally? Is he acting ethically? Why or why not?
Scenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. As the Marketing Manager for Southeastern Corrugated, what would you do upon receiving the request for quotation from Coastal Products?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
1.Which of the following pertains to an efficient supply chain? A)It deals with innovative products B)The product life cycle will be short C)It is worthwhile to invest in good forecasting systems D)All of the above PS: OPTION D INCORRECT 2.Which of the following will have lesser bullwhip effect in a supply chain? A)Supply Chain co-ordination B)Opening more stocking points closer to the point of consumption C)Empowering the lower echelons of the inventory to take decisions on fulfilling the demand D)All of the above PS: OPTION B INCORRECT
What are quality standards and how to guarantee your company has reached them? QUESTION 2:What are the four flows within the corporate environment, which are tried to optimize through logistics? QUESTION 3:Describe supplier selection and evaluation process. QUESTION 4:What are the differences between local and global sourcing? Explain also in which situations either of the options are preferable. QUESTION 5:What is demand forecasting and why it’s vital to the company’s operations? QUESTION 6:Explain the purpose, methods and the outcome of good customer service process. Your answer must be at least 1-2 pages.
Over past 4 weeks, KAMM (Kuwait Arab Malls Monitor) reported a severe decline in French products consumption -- in Millions of items: 400M, 300M, 50M, 1M. KAMM need to know expected forecast next week.
Explain the Purchasing Portfolio that is being used in McDonald's with a diagram
Rochor & Co has the following sales forecast for the next quarter: April, 20,000 units; May, 24,000 units; June, 28,000 units. Sales totalled 16,000 units in March. The March finished goods inventory was 4,000 units. End-of- month finished goods inventory levels are planned to be equal to 20 percent of the next month's planned sales. How many units would be produced in April? Group of answer choices 20,000 units 20,800 units 5,600 units 4,800 units
Id-6c An aggregate plan provides justification for: Select one: a. the budget amount requested b. demand for individual products c. demand for product families d. the demand for the parts of each product and. number of customers
Put this in other words. Analyze and elaborate this one. In the intricate orchestration of supply chain management, predictive analytics emerges as an indispensable conductor. Drawing upon colossal datasets from multifarious sources, predictive analytics unfurls a tapestry of precise supply and demand prognostications, meticulous inventory optimization, seamless logistics orchestration for punctual deliveries, anticipation of equipment maintenance exigencies, and the nimble adaptation to unforeseen contingencies. In this ever-evolving landscape, predictive analytics has metamorphosed into a critical lever for cultivating an agile and resilient supply chain, warding off disruptions, and laying the foundations for sustainable success.