From who stole the cookie from the cookie jar to who started World War I, disagreements immensely affect the lives of everyone regardless of the topic. Certainly, every war is caused by disagreements throughout countries including World War II and the Civil war that resulted after World War I. Arguments begin because people want their way. This can also include specific tribes and nationalities in the world wanting their rights and own ways of life. Countries need to stand up for their rights and ways of life just like people do individually, which usually leads to disagreements because everyone wants something different. Conflict arises between regions for a great amount of reasons. Because of conflict involving unbalanced power is Europe, …show more content…
As shown in document A, it is quite noticeable that the central powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy) were ideally close together which makes them seem even stronger in power. By being so conveniently close to each other, it must have been easier to establish a strong military base and also obtain a lot of armaments for the war. Because these countries neighbored each other, they had more efficient communication between military and also the government where the allied powers did not. Despite the fact these countries were right next to one another, they also had an extreme growth in military weapons and equipment right before the war had started.(Document C). This gave the central powers an enormous advantage. They had gained more power and control over the others which created fury within other countries. This displays great importance because evidence shows that unbalanced military power was not exceptional for the citizens of …show more content…
Being supportive of a country is not an awful concern, however, it can draw to a point where it is taken out of hand. In Europe, there was no way to compromise between these groups; they all wanted what was only satisfying for themselves. Document B’s political cartoon shows each country pointing fingers at one another since no one wants to take the blame for the war when in reality it was all of their faults. Because each and every colony is so focused on nationalism and the good for their own country, no one gets what they want which leads into the war. Document D states “We don't ever again want to step on the toes of any foreign power, but at the same time we don’t want our own feet trampled by any foreign power”. This evidence makes it clear that the citizens of these countries did not want foreign powers taking them over. Although they had no way to stop them, they also did not want to anger them. These especially thin grounds were set too thin not too outbreak in
After the First World War, many countries saw political, social and economic changes. The world was plunged into World War 2 because of the Munich Agreement, an agreement regarding Nazi Germany's annexation of portions of Czechoslovakia along the country's borders. This agreement caused many issues between European countries. Many people of the “Big Four” had different views on dealing with aggression. Collective Security was a more effect response to aggression than appeasement.
When one country got into a conflict with another , it led to them also having conflicts with their allied countries. For example, in the “Crime of the Ages” Germany was pointing the finger at Russia and since Russia, England, and France had an alliance they all were blaming Germany (Doc B). Countries like England that had no direct problem with other countries had to go to war due to their alliances. This controversy made alliances a main cause because since there was the Triple Entente (Russia,France, and Great Britain) and the Triple Alliance (Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary). If you went against anybody on either side you had to also fight their allies and they had to fight yours, causing everyone to fight. Being that this all took place in Europe, placement was also a big deal. It would have been a smarter move to not be fighting on two fronts. For example, Germany was stuck during the war because they had to fight off France on the western front and Russia on the eastern front (Doc A). It put them in between a rock and a hard space because their men were split and half was on one front while the other half was on the other front. Germany couldn’t put their full focus on one side like Russia and France could, causing them a
World War I, the pointless war. World War I was a war that started with the assassination of an Austria-hungary prince by a Serbian man. Austria-Hungary ended up declaring war on Serbia, a Slavic country. After Russia declared war on Austria to help Serbia many countries joined in after with their alliances. What was the main cause of WWI?
World War one, a horrendous battle fought between the Prussians and the the entire world (Allied Forces) killing millions of soldiers and citizens on both sides. The war began in July 28, 1914 when "Archduke Franz Ferdinand" was assassinated, this triggered a chain of drastic events. The German kaiser (emperor) king of Prussia- Wilhelm II lead the Prussian army until its defeat in November 11, 1980.The Versatile treaty, (when Germany surrendered, all nations had agreed to stop fighting as the terms of peace were negotiated). The Versaille treaty was the most important peace treaties that caused an end to World War 1.
World War 1 was one of the bloodiest wars that the world ever seen. World War 1 was a war fought in Europe, between Germany, Russia, France, Great Britain, the U.S. and many others. At first, Europeans wanted a balanced power, but then alliance started to form. An assassination happened and soon Europe was at war. However, there are numerous causes of World War that are not commonly known which include nationalism, militarism, and alliance.
World War I was a devastating war in Europe between several countries and alliances that took place between 1914 CE - 1918 CE which utilized several modern industrialized weapons, took millions of lives and changed the course of history. World War I was sparked by the assassination of the Archduke of Austria-Hungary, but increased military spending, alliances treaties and colonization assisted the spark set by Gavrilo Princip(assassin of Archduke)to spread into a wildfire. Increasing military budget was one of the building blocks of World War I. In 1899 , In response to Great Britain's military spending German Chancellor calls upon the Reichstag (German Parliament) While Great Britain was increasing its colonial empire, German Chancellor calls
After the conflict with Austria-Hungary and Serbia Germany saw how, because Russia supported Serbia, war was almost impossible to avoid (Doc M). They believed it was better to go to war now rather than latter and get it over with, seen in the quote “I believe war is unavoidable and the sooner the better.” by German general, General von Moltke. It was official saying like this that drove the countries to war, creating a great deal of nationalism, many even cheering (Doc C) when they were told they were going to war. Some saw war better than just waiting for it, however when spirits dropped during the war the nations attempted to keep the countries excited with propaganda like songs and posters (Doc H) and it worked, keeping people eager for war. They wanted to win the war for the working class, sacrificing many soldiers to the battle (Doc
Throughout the course of history, World War 1 was known as one of the worst wars out of all the wars. Though it was one of the worst, the United States had contributed to the Allied war effort during WW1. The United States had contributed to the Allied war with plenty of men, weaponry, ammunitions, machinery, and also providing a major moral boost for the men who were already engaged in the battle. America had also played an important role that had determined the outcome of this major conflict.
The beginning of the 20th century in Europe was a prime time. Europe controlled many empires around the world. Its technology was the greatest it has ever been. In 1914, war broke out lasting four long, dreadful years. The war killed millions of civilians and destroyed the economies leaving Europe broken.
World War Two (WWII) was the deadliest conflict in human history, with tens of millions of deaths in its six-year period. It caused political and economic unrest, as well as killing and injuring countless people. Some say that the political or economic effects were greater, but the number of deaths far surpasses any political or economic harm. So many families and people without children died, which means that generations upon generations of people died with them. This wiping out of future humans makes the human cost far greater than the political or economic cost.
It can be stated and proved that World War II was one of the most terrific times in history, with its persecution of normal civilians for not looking “perfect” or for their religion, and the genocide of all those groups. But how did this all happen?
Historians suggest that alliances made violence almost inevitable and comment that without them, international squabbles would never have led to such a catastrophic war. For instance Germany’s aggression in Morocco was an attempt to display Germany as a more necessary and influential ally than Britain. It was however, unsuccessful as Germany’s increasing threat to the European distribution of power, and the Kaisers menace to relations that encouraged France and Britain to launch the Entente trio of WW1. It can be argued that Germany more frequently exploited the alliances than the members of the Entente, as emphasised by Fischer, who demonstrates how whilst the alliances were formed for defence, they were in most cases not implemented with the same aim considered, becoming offensive. As Schmitt believes, the alliances ‘when put to the final test, almost mechanically operated to convert a local quarrel into war.’ However, Joll suggests, the alliances alone were insufficient for causing the war. He suggests that they influenced the readiness of military plans, but didn’t increase the opportunities for them being implemented. The European powers didn’t consider alliances to be concrete and were therefore reluctant to apply military
In today’s digital age, development of new technology and weapons are at an alarming rate, hence arises the need to stay ahead of advancements in order to properly defend the nation, as well as coalition forces and allies. In this period of warfare, the number one threat comes in the form of air breathing and ballistic missiles. During World War II, this threat was present, but was not thought to be prevalent.
World War I was the result of leaders' aggression towards other countries which was supported by the rising nationalism of the European nations. Economic and imperial competition and fear of war prompted military alliances and an arms race, which further escalated the tension contributing to the outbreak of war. One cause of the World War was militarism, which is a policy in which military preparedness is of primary significance to a situation. Another cause of the World War was nationalism. Nationalism is the pride and devotion form one towards his/her country. It played a great part in the causes of World War 1 because citizens wanted to stand up for their country, and fight for them. The third
The building up of weapons and armed forces in Europe was a key point in the years leading up to the war as it reminded the countries of their alliance systems. The personal desires of each country propelled them to seek the aid of alliances as they believed that if they chose to help their allies, the allies would stand by them—in the end, it was not about selflessness but wholly about self-interest. The puzzle of why the alliances chose to assist each other in a conflict-ridden atmosphere becomes somewhat clear when the personal objectives of each nation comes into the picture. There was a hope that these countries would benefit from forming these alliances but in the context of Europe, the Triple Entente, which tied Britain, France and Russia,