Question Presented. Under What Circumstances May Individuals

The ideas that corporations are viewed as people in the eyes of the law seems like a farfetched idea. However, with closer examination one cannot help but wonder if this is truly becoming the case. Since the 1950’s the rights of corporations have been expanding through multiple court cases that have charted the way for more recent cases like Citizens United v. FEC and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores . To better understand the notion that corporations are sometimes viewed as people it is important to understand the definition of a corporation. In the dictionary, a corporation is defined as a number of persons united in one body for a purpose . Even though it is hard for many to view a corporation as a “person”, it is undeniable that corporations

The other fundamental issue that Charles raises is the treatment that the employees get from both the law and the proprietors/accounts. He says that employees in most instances are treated as property that belongs to the owner of the business and recorded as costs (salary/allowances) and not as assets. This effectively means that they are treated as things that are supposed to be minimized just like any other costs. This is a trend that needs to be changed and the employees need to be treated as cherished community together with the proprietors and the stakeholders. It should be a community that has members who are proud to be members of that particular community, allowed to express their views on issue related to them and the organization and generally have a free environment to

which is work that involves providing a service to individual clients. The clients in Grey's

“The idea that a corporation is a legal person with constitutional rights is, of course, a controversial one. Some commentators argue that it's bad policy. In my view, however, it is a well-settled principle of US constitutional law and justifiably so. The legislative history of the Fourteenth Amendment suggests that Congress substituted the word ''person'' for the word ''citizen'' precisely so that the provisions so affected would protect not just natural persons but also legal persons, such as corporations, from oppressive legislation.”

Question 4- Identify sources and types of information and advice available in relation to employment responsibilities and rights. (1.1.4)

supervisor must control all access, enforce the law(when required), ensure the safety of all clients

The concept of mandatory pro bono and whether or not lawyers should be required to participate in this public service has been the contentious subject of debate over recent years. Focusing on Mirko Bagaric and Penny Dimopoulos’ statement: “In our view not only do lawyers not have a duty to act for free, but they are misguided in doing so and should, for the long term benefit of the community, cease engaging in pro bono work,” this essay will critically analyse the implications of introducing mandatory pro bono into the legal profession by examining both the positive and negative aspects through the issues of altruism, tradition, government funding and the onus on small firms.

Also, it is turning out to be progressively normal for lawyers all in all practice to allude immigration cases, to a pro-immigration rehearse, where for instance, a current customer of the firm has an immigration issue. The firm will most likely be unable to handle the case, additionally wishes to benefit the customer's requirements. Utilizing a pro practice as an expert takes care of the issue and makes a decent systems administration environment.

The definition of 'employee' and 'worker' differs slightly from one area of legislation to another, but generally workers have less rights

In R v. Redfern & Dunlop Ltd. (Aircraft Division) , the Court held that where the employees who were not in the decision making level could not be identifiable with the company and therefore were not deemed to be the controlling mind of the company. The question that comes up is that if a person at a lower level commits a crime in the name of the company, the company cannot be held liable for the same. This may pose to be a problem in the sense that the company may make a division between the senior management and the employees to avoid criminal proceedings against them

Providers can be anything they want, as long as they provide for the community. Somebody classified in the Provider group could be a seamstress, carpenter, or farmers.

Under the supreme court ruling, corporations were granted corporate personhood--a term that in itself is an oxymoron. The term combines two words: corporate, meaning relating to a corporation, especially a large company or group, and personhood, meaning the quality or condition of being an individual person. One cannot be a part of a large company or group and be considered and individual person in the same aspect. Corporations are made up of individual people, who each possess the right of personhood, all making decisions based off of their own understanding of right and wrong. As Henry Thoreau said in his essay Civil Disobedience, “It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience”. The conscience of a corporation should never be called into question, but instead the conscience of those controlling the

Though the legal assistants have a desire to help their ability to do so is caught up in the bureaucracy of a lengthy intake process and by fear of overstepping their limited authority to actually assist the customer. Julie, the director and only full-time employee at the center is the main source of this. This case study examples her lack of management skills and lack of direction which does a great injustice to not only the customer but the volunteers.

In large public companies, management and ownership are separate. By contrast, in workers’ co-operatives employees will have contributed towards the capital of the organisation and may elect managers at annual meetings.

It seems understandable that a business should exist as a separate legal personality as it would be impossible for an individual’s motives and goals to be perfectly in line with that of the company as is demonstrated above in Salomon. Following this theory the idea that the rights and duties of a company are not that of its members and shareholders as demonstrated in the case of Lee v Lee Air Farming .