Analysis of Charles Handy's Article

Employers within the private sector organizations in these provinces do not want First Contract Arbitration imposed on them, as this takes away their management rights and power. They have capitalistic mentalities and employees are a cog in the wheel of monetary gain. ()

A corporations structure is designed to be financially profitable while presenting value to its share holders. The Cheif Financial Officer of a corporations job is to represent the shareholders and to increase current value in the corporation's stock. This corporate mentality will force a CFO to cut down on working conditions, workers' pay, and workers' benefits if the corporation is not as profitable as the shareholders' desire. This poor treatment of workers peaked during the Progressive

The two main issues that will be discussed is the right to privacy, as well as search and seizure. These two areas can affect the employees, owner, and the business as a whole. The goal in a business is to make money and to protect their goods. That being said, certain aspects that an employee

Charles M. Blow, father of three, is The New York Time’s visual Op Ed columnist. The author mainly discusses the ongoing epidemic of police brutality on innocent black bystanders, and how it is becoming a form of terrorism. He was prompted to start writing this piece after hearing and watching videos of many of the deadly encounters brought upon by police abuse. The author is trying to substantiate his opinion that the people who are supposed to protect lives (police), have now become a threat to it. He hopes to achieve recognition of this article by presenting the problem to the readers and the surrounding communities in order to raise awareness on the subject. Blow evidences his claim that police brutality is becoming a serious issue by

Unions could help pursue these principles in a couple of ways. Employees that are represented by a union usually are more satisfied with their

The third source is endorsing the importance of business owners providing better working environments, respecting their employees, and the government reactions toward this belief. Free-market economy was beneficial for business owners however working class were often treated poorly and were overworked in terrible condition while most of the profit are kept by business owners. The source is not in favor of lazier-fair capitalism and is opposing the rude and thoughtless manner of owners, therefor Calvin Coolidge uses the negative words, “scorn” and “blame” to describe the attitude of business owners towards their workers. The owners only focus on their own benefits and they consider their workers as the slaves and they don’t esteem or appreciate

Most important, the employees can earn stock, which gives them voice within the company to make pertinent decisions.

In the Romano Pitesti case, Tickton-Jones’ Management Team is faced with a situation that is not altogether uncommon in the business world, in that some employees feel that members of the Sales staff are being given “special” treatment by the company. Romano’s actions have probably not been as bad as what has been described to Management, but due to the fact that employees are still trying to find their place in the new, combined company, any hint of “unfairness” is immediately put under a microscope by other employees, and therefore, Management will have to take some sort of action, in order to show the other employees that their concerns are being taken seriously.

The article states about the economic factor in America. It sensitizes on the justice the workers in America should be given. The article talks about how the workers in America are treated with injustice. This is shown well when the article starts by, "If the laws of economics were enforced as strictly as the laws of physics, America would be a workers' paradise." Visit the article in this link: http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/workersrights.htm.

The structure of his paper is a little confusing. The way he orders the topics toward the end do not really flow with the paper. After his introductory paragraph, he begins explaining his strongest point of the paper. His next paragraph explains another supporting topic of his paper. Next , he introduces the counter-argument of the paper. After this point, the flow of the paper becomes confusing. He starts explaining different types of businesses. In my opinion, this should be at the beginning of the paper . After that paragraph , he begins talking about growing and

He (2001: ) further mentions that “it is the people who work in the business that really count. Treating employees badly...will inevitably come to haunt us in the long run”.

Employers are considered to be apart of upper class and are owners of business organizations and corporations (C.E.O.’s) and managers, while employees who are hired as clerks, associates, clerical and auxiliary staff, often times at entry level positions are working towards a pay increase and a promotion to become a part of the elite. There is often conflict between those who are presumed to have power and those who do not. Those without power, employees at times feel victimize, as if they will never achieve success because employers have set up the system for the rich to get richer and the poor to remain in the gutters, as a result they may exhibit signs of resentment which contributes to the conflict.

John Humphry makes it in his article very clear that he is a big fan of old fashioned dictionaries. He personally states that by saying “they are as close to my heart as they are to my desk because they are so much more than a useful tool.” Throughout the article there are couples arguments that show why he prefers dictionaries over anything else, such as the “physical sensation – the feel and smell of good paper”. However, I believe his main argument is that people forget / people will forget how to prober write. He states in his article that nowadays, hardly anyone still writes an actual letter to a person, instead everyone is using emails. When writing an email, the spellcheck will automatically tell you what’s written wrong and what not.

These require that employee have a clear understanding about how their jobs will change and how they will be rewarded. For example, an employee who doesn't cooperate with the change effort of the company, the employee will still doing the same job and do not have an incensement in their pay.

The process of employee- ownership, involving all business activities and functions associated with exploitation and opportunities identification (Bygrave and Hofer, 1991; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000), have spawned considerable interests from practitioners and academics. In reality, the employee-ownership functionalities are processes and elements that are vital to the growth of a business organization and economy.