In modern day politics language is used to persuade the public whetheer its used negatively or positvely it desont matter as long as thtey can get the vote. If we were to take an example of using negative language to persuade voters we can all think of one person; Donald Trump.Even though this is an american issue Mr. trump has found a way to disturb the whole world. His political skills may not be great but the one thing he deso well, is speak to the people. He is able to influence voters by attaching negative images to innocent groups of people. Saying all muslims are terrorist is a broad generilasation and a false one, and yet it works. Why? Becasue he is playing of peoples fears without proving a legitmate point. There is no evidence behind
Imagine that Donald Trump wasn't a businessman? I think he brought up the stocks, they are high. He is a President for the United States. He has or had four different businesses. He was in a Reality TV show. Donald trump has different talents and that he is a Renaissance man.
In the article “The Brutal Economic Truth Behind the Rise of Trump” Anthony Mirhaydari sides with Donald Trump and discusses how he is a good candidate. He argues that although he may be loud, obnoxious, and have very radical foreign policy ideals he still is not an awful choice. He brings up the quotes, “It's the economy stupid” which was coined by James Carville during Bill Clinton's political campaign while he was running for president. He states how people will gravitate and make their main decisions on the economic policies of each candidate. He understands the self interest in human nature and how people want to secure their own personal economic situation before they deal with foreign affairs such as the immigration problem. People will almost always vote for who will help out their economic situation the best and the author feels that Trump has a solid plan and a good grasp of what the problem is.
In response to the widely unexpected and controversial election of Donald Trump the University of Maryland’s Government and Politics department hosted a panel to help staff and students understand how this happened. Additionally the panel hosts each spoke of what will happen to our government in terms of foreign and domestic policy. Each panel host had a different perspective on the matter and it made to be a very interesting discussion filled with a diverse set of opinions on how Donald Trump got elected and what it all means going forward. The speakers for the event were Irwin Morris, David Karol, Antoine Banks, Liliana Mason, Stella Rouse, Vadimir Tismaneanu, and Karol Soltan. Though there were many speakers at the event each person had a brief time to speak on the matter at hand and present their own analysis on the election.
Article 1: New York Times “Donald Trump Is Elected President in Stunning Repudiation of the Establishment” ; Written by: Matt Elegendor and Micharl Barbaro.
Donald Trump is the toughest Presidential candidate currently running. His ideas will revolutionize America by improving our economy and decreasing our debt. Trump is a very successful entrepreneur, and his experience will significantly benefit our trade. Having a President with no political experience is an advantage, because he understands what change the people need and has different views.
Storming through the United States in heads both old and young, the name Donald Trump has spawned political disorder all over the country. The results of the events with a correlation to that name, which have occurred in the past year, beg a question: How did Donald Trump win the election and become the president in the first place? The answers to that question are his use of his background and history as well as persuasive manipulation of emotion, all matters of hidden persuasion. However, the use of these tactics is not uncommon throughout the lives of other leaders: Take Joseph Stalin, previously a popular Bolshevik figure, whose propaganda either downplayed his opposition or encouraged following his rule. However, Stalin established
An event that relates to Golding’s theme in the modern world is the election of Donald J. Trump as President of the United States. President Trump has risen from a television personality to the leader of our country. He has put in place trade bans and promised to build a wall around our borders to keep out immigrants. He is cutting America off from the rest of the world. Many other countries see our President as closed-minded and foolish. It is surprising how many people still support his actions, as many of them have been rash and for only his benefit and the benefit of more wealthy people. He Tweets about his actions as if he is correct and the whole world around him is wrong. His recurring comments about his presidential behavior undermine
As American citizens, it is our obligation to set up a future for the next generation.We have not achieved this goal yet. Right now America is divided.
On January 20th, the nation will inaugurate a new president. What event, issue, fact, development or trend from American history between 1865 and 1990 would you want the president to know? Write an essay in which you explain why your choice is critical knowledge for the country’s new leader. Be sure to support your thesis with historical evidence.
Under Rawls’s “Ideal of the Statesman,” it is more clearly seen whether this strike was approved or rejected by Rawls. Rawls sees the statesman as not someone who holds an “office” but more of a “truthful or virtuous individual” (Rawls, 97). This means no matter what position someone holds that does not mean automatically that they are a statesman. Therefore, Donald Trump must prove himself a statesman to use that way of thinking that Rawls presents. While under the Law of Peoples the idea of whether the strike was allowed or not is under contention, Donald Trump has proven himself to not be a statesman time and time again. Looking back at this past election year, Donald Trump has never exemplified someone who looks to “the next generation,”
Politicians often use language as a tool to persuade the general public with their assertion of power. Politicians use linguistic strategies and rhetorical devices to persuade and to have an effect on its audience to achieve their political goals. Rhetorical ploys are a way to persuade without making a real argument while linguistic phenomena makes it hard for the receiver of an argument, to detect what is actually being argued. This essay aims to analyse how linguistic phenomena and rhetorical ploys are used to blindfold the intended meaning with examples from political speeches.
Discussion 1 A way in which language is used to manipulate other is by word choice whether strong or soft. Word choice is an important key on how what we say will make others fill. This is because word choice is a very powerful weapon that can make what others say hold validation and can make someone look pure in our eyes yet as easily as it can make someone look good it can do harm as well. To infer in the article Politics and the English Language the author George Orwell stated “Words like phenomenon, element, individual (as noun), objective, categorical, effective, virtual, basic, primary, promote, constitute, exhibit, exploit, utilize, eliminate, liquidate, are used to dress up a simple statement and give an air of scientific impartiality to
After announcing his presidential candidacy in June of 2015, Donald Trump began the transition from civilian to politician. When stepping into a more public space political candidates give permission for others to comment on their actions, decisions and beliefs. The public and press will analyze and scrutinize the actions of candidates to determine if the person is worthy or capable to handle the responsibility of the office. Rap songs are one to the ways to judge or poll the black communities sentiments regarding popular political candidates. According to XXL Magazine’s website rapper have changed their tune when it come to mentioning Trump in their songs:
Since the election of President Donald J. Trump, a president whose political viewpoints are entrenched by nativism, protectionism, and an apparent fondness for Russia, some analysts have made the claim that German Chancellor Angela Merkel is now the leader of the free world. Being at the forefront of the Syrian refugee crisis by maintaining Germany’s open-door refugee policy, and her intense support for free trade, it is understandable to comprehend why analysts assume that the mantel as protector of “Western Values” is now held by Angela Merkel. However, following the aftermath of President Donald J. Trump’s poisonous trip to Europe, there is now a new contender for the title “leader of the free world”, President Emmanuel Macron of
Donald trump is a candidate for the presidency representing the republic party. His leadership style is unconventional and radical. He has no care for foreign policy’s or minorities. He has been compared to president Clinton in several articles with his practices. According to Dodo (2016) “The passage of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 and the offensive charm of President Clinton to slowly weaken the Unions and expose the working American families to relentless competition from the globalized world economy, planted the seed of the discontentment of the independents, Democrats, low-working class America, and all other angry voters that are flocking to Mr. Trump. Hence, NAFTA, with all fairness, could be considered among one of the most important political legacies of Bill Clinton, together with the repeal of the Glass Seagal Act in 1999. (3) Mr. Trump´s denunciation of the bad trade deals made in the name of free trade, and the never ending closing of factories, and the incessant outsourcing and offshoring of millions of American jobs to countries such as China, Mexico, Indonesia, Vietnam and India, just to cite a few, resonate very strongly primarily with the blue collar working people that are not sold on the virtue of free trade.” Donald trump is a bad reflection on government and does not represent this country well.