How Does Sociometric Popularity Affect Dyadic Relationships?

Ethnographic approach to the research on friendship provided data which couldn’t be obtained using other approaches. Therefore, it extended our knowledge in this topic beyond the limits that constrain other methods of research. On the other hand, its shortcomings make its results questionable. Yet, some of these can be verified using different approaches or discover things that other approaches wouldn’t find that easily but can research them further. Concluding, the benefits of ethnographic approach overcome it shortcomings – especially when

As it states in Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, a relationship is a way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected. The stage is set in early 1920s Long Island and New York. Nick Carraway, the main narrator in the novel The Great Gatsby by Scott F. Fitzgerald sees three relationships developing when he is spending time with Jay Gatsby and his long distant cousin Daisy Buchanan in West Egg. In the Great Gatsby, three main relationships form between Tom, Daisy’s husband whose unfaithfulness and aggressive behavior causes him to have an affair with Myrtle Wilson, the wife of George Wilson, a man whose dedication and hard work is never enough for Myrtle. Myrtle and Tom’s relationship are different from that of their respective

Knapp’s relationship model elaborates on how relationships grow and last and also how they come to an end. The model is ten different stages which come under two interrogating sections. Knapp’s relationship model serves the purpose to understand how a relationship comes together and grows apart. Stages can vary in the time a couple takes to complete it, as well as the relationship can end at any stage. Stages can be skipped and repeated, and is dependent on the couple themselves. The creator of the model, Mark Knapp is a well-known professor at the University of Texas and is renowned for his nonverbal communication research. He developed this model to analysis the phases and development of a relationship between two people.

”(O’Hair 5) There are many different types of relationship, relationships between parents and children and relationships between friends are

Often relationships with others can be formed at an early age. Relationships can vary from being friendships, or even ones formed between family members. Many relationships can prove to be complex and tend to evolve over time. Both “This is what it means to say Phoenix, Arizona by , and “the movie Smoke Signals illustrate the complexity of relationships between individuals.

For this example, I will be analyzing familial relationships, but all types of personal relationships are shown within the movie McFarland, USA. We build relationships for many reason, some being that we feel that we need to belong. Another major reason is due to the rewarding aspects of relationships. Some other reasons people attract each other is due to appearance, proximity, ability to complement us, or those that are similar to us. When looking at a familial relationships, there can be many variations due to the fact that every family has different rules and are co-created.

In life there are many changes that can cause a true friendship to go wary such as marriage, divorce, birth of children, new careers, and sickness. However, through each of those events the two must remember to keep the intimacy, the letting down of emotional barriers and the expression of innermost thoughts and feelings, “that which makes friendships thrive must be an enjoyable one” and to “always interact” (Karbo 3). Although psychologists continue to research the formation of friendships the great philosopher Aristotle knew exactly how friendships formed and how the lasted.

This chapter rounded out our examination of popular culture from the last of the three perspectives, the interaction approach; this focuses on how popular culture results from the interactions we as individuals have within small groups. It’s important to note just how much our identity needs recognition from others in order to exist as this really highlights the relationship between societal groups and the individual. They almost provide a validation of the individual self. The way in which we present ourselves within certain situations can be referred to as presentations of self; these shift based on the social context we are in. How we interact in groups can be based on the type of group we are in such as a dyad or triad; however, if you are seeking to gain in social network, you must go beyond your

It is often said that all good things come to an end. Relationships come and go, and some mean more than others. In fact, there was even a relationship model developed by a communication researcher by the name of Mark Knapp. In his model, he goes through what seems to be presented as a smooth step transition from each stage in which a relationship eventually evolves into. As I studied this up then down ladder model, I began to realize that I ought to build up some strong calf muscles, because my relationship sure has climbed up and down a few flights of stairs. Mark Knapp believes that relationships go through multiple stages, the uphill stages being initiation, experimenting, intensifying, integrating, bonding, then relational maintenance. On the flip side, Knapp believes the descending stages to be differentiating, circumscribing, avoiding, and eventually, termination.

Just as self concept seemed a vicious circle, where this affects that and that effects this; relational development is the same. Relational development can alter our lives and our communication, while communication issues can alter our relational development and our lives. The relational perspective is a pragmatic one and focuses on the continuance of communication processes through relationships. (Rogers, 2004.) Relationships go through a series of stages. The initial and first encounter to a relationship is called the initiating stage. While in this stage, two people attempt to create favorably impressionable first impressions. In this stage you will look for cues about the other person’s personality, attitude, beliefs, and values so that you can progress the relationship. If the relationship continues and impressions are favorable than the two people move to the second stage, also known as the experimenting stage. In this stage people reveal themselves further but not completely since the stage is still a precarious one. If a common ground and understanding of each other is obtained then the relationship moves to the next stage, the intensifying stage. In this stage shared experiences becomes common and self disclosure is open. The next stage is the integrating stage, this is where the individuals usually become a couple. They have shared interests and attitudes, and sometimes talk or act alike. The other individual becomes like your other half. If things go awry than relationships often shift to the circumscribing stage. This is when couples start to self disclose less and less to the other person. Then comes the stagnating stage. At this point there is no communication and no activity between the two people. Sometimes there is an

Human relationships are the foundation of human life, they strongly influence other individual’s behaviour (Bercheid et al., 2000). There are different types of relationships such as co workers, friendship, marriage which all involve a connection and therefore is an important characteristic of the formation of human relationships (Salisch 1996). The purpose of this essay is to explore research within human relationships and the relevant social psychological theories that have been linked with this conflicting topic. The theories that will be discussed throughout this essay will be the attribution theory, social learning theory, social exchange, attachment theory, evolutionary theory and the breakdown of relationships. This would initially

My unhealthy attachments in love are also characteristic of the symbiotic personality type as I tend to deprive myself emotionally to assure that my partner’s needs are met. My emotional suppression, oftentimes, leads to the violent outbursts like the one I experienced with my last attempt at a relationship. By subduing my opinions on what I hated and what made me unhappy, I eventually erupted into an “uncharacteristic” barrage of physical and emotional abuse that left both parties damaged.

Wegner, D.M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253-276). New York:

In A. L. Evangelista & D. Perlman, Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ISBN 0-521-82617-9

A study done by Allen et al. (2005) assesses the minds of seventh and eighth graders to understand the effects of popularity. The main question asked is whether popularity in adolescence is a positive or negative influence and how this effects a student over a period of time. This study was conducted because it is rationalized that popularity is always a positive influence on an adolescent. It is explained that popularity amongst peers can be seen as positive or negative. Deviant behavior is said to increase drastically based on the popularity of an adolescent and how their peer groups supports these behaviors. In contrast, it has been said that popularity can help maintain a positive relationship amongst other peers, and hostility towards others decreases when it is disapproved by others in a peer group. Researchers studied three different hypothesis-. First, popularity among adolescents will be associated with a wide variety of different markers in social assimilation. Second, popularity will be constant with peer norms and be strongly influenced. Lastly, popularity will increase minor deviant behavior over a period of time.