Is Human Resources important? Should it be done away with altogether? Dr. Dave Ulrich gives his take on the topic in his article, “A New Mandate for Human Resources,” in the Harvard Business Review. This topic is up for debate because of the widespread variance in differing opinions on the matter. HR is the department of a business or organization that deals with the hiring, administration, and training of personnel. In this paper, I plan to summarize and critique Ulrich’s “A New Mandate for Human Resources” for young business majors or those interested in reading this article.
Ulrich begins the article by questioning if HR is important and should it be eliminated. He feels that it should be abolished as it is, but revised into a more helpful
…show more content…
Dr. Ulrich goes on to support the need for HR in today’s business world. He feels that there are 5 critical challenges that businesses face: Globalization, profitability through growth, technology, intellectual capital, and change (Ulrich 126). Conversely, these things do not matter on a competitive scale. All businesses need these things to survive, but they can be attained and copied. The only competitive weapon left is organization (Ulrich 127). That is where Ulrich believes HR plays its most vital role. The differences between the leading businesses in their respective markets is their organization. Top-tier businesses are run efficiently with good HR relations. For businesses to take the next step towards maximizing their operations, they must change the culture surrounding HR and train their HR teams to become sufficient in promoting higher employee morale. Ulrich is convinced that senior operating managers must value the “soft” matters, define and hold HR accountable for its results, invest in innovative practices, and upgrade HR professionals (Ulrich …show more content…
Ulrich did well in writing this article However, I was not a fan of this piece. To begin, the topic was not interesting and nothing within the article showed its importance. An important part of writing is to “leave out all irrelevant information” (Salih). Obviously, HR is a necessary part of any firm or corporation, but Ulrich did not display any specific statistics or instances where HR deficiencies had a resounding effect on the overall performance of a company. Also, including those things in this article would’ve made the piece more interesting and just a better read altogether. Secondly, the organization of this article was off. While reading this article I consistently found myself lost within Ulrich’s sub-points. With each argument he made, there was substantial information explaining the point he was making. This information made the article hard to follow and seemed like fluff in some instances. Despite these shortcomings, there is valuable information within the article. Organization is the biggest weapon in competition and I agree that HR is a component of it. Also, the value assigned to these components of business should be higher. Additionally, Ulrich included some graphs and charts in the text that gave it a more appealing look. This article has lots of important information on the changing landscape of business and what it takes to sustain success. I just don’t feel that it is directly tied to the subject of human
Human resources (HR) professionals have an awkward position in corporations. Other departments worry about their objectives and strategies, whereas the HR department must apply their targets and strategy to the overall business’s goals to produce results. Regardless what other departments engage in, HR’s visibility, impact, and value in companies such as Best Buy is crucial to stay in existence.
Secondly, human resource is an important aspect of business; most of organizations nowadays view people as their most valuable resources. In fact, the part that intrigued me was the challenges derived from the changes in function and structure of HR department. HR is becoming a need for every aspects of day-to-day management, and job-seekers would find their jobs require more of generalists with more skills and competencies to perform multi-tasking (Larsen & Brewster 2003). Those are challenges as well as potential, on which you could learn and develop yourself.
Some of the reasons organisations have adopted the Ulrich model include: 1. the increase of expectations of the HR function “Organisations expect more from HR in terms of contributing to strategy, enabling the execution of business plans, and delivering tangible commercial benefits.” (CIPD, 2015) 2. Increase Competition. “Organisations need HR functions that can deliver skilled, creative, motivated, flexible and committed employees; hence the growth of centres of excellence (for example, specialising in reward or learning and talent development).” (CIPD, 2015) 3. Cost effective “The introduction of shared services is seen as particularly important to achieving savings, although these cannot be realised without other roles operating effectively.” (CIPD,
Further to the recent organisation re-structure forecasting the closure of the HR department, the following report has been created to highlight the importance of the HR activities and the support it offers within the organisation.
During the course of the Twentieth Century there was a significant evolution of the function of HR.
Human resources management was defined as ‘a strategic, integrated and coherent approach to the employment, development and well-being of the people working in organizations’ by Boxall and Purcell (2003). Noon, 1992 (as cited in Armstrong, 2014 a, p6) drew ‘doubts of whether HRM was a map, a model or a theory. But it is evident that the original concept could be seen as a philosophy’. The human
On reviewing the media articles, I have summarised the current HR issues in the following topics.
It captures what successful and effective HR people do and deliver across every aspect and specialism of the profession, and sets out the required underpinning skills, behaviour and knowledge.
Human Resource management has a high impact on the overall organization being managed. HR management makes certain that human talent is used successfully and resourcefully to accomplish organizational goals. As an organization core competency, human resources has distinctive competencies that generates high value and sets apart an organization from competitors in areas such as productivity, quality and service, employee skills, and innovative changes. HR management activities can be grouped into categories which include strategic HR management; equal employment opportunity; staffing and talent management; compensation and benefits; and employee and industry relations. This paper will
Managers rely on HR to provide effective staff capable of accomplishing the goals of the organization. HR is valuable in ensuring
Anther HR issue the article may be helpful for is defining why a manager is important. Some industries are struggling with
We are not the first to suggest that HR examine its past (see Ulrich et al., 1997). Yet, our call to honour the past as it pertains to HR and organisational change takes a slightly different view of what is meant by the past. Dave Ulrich, a well-known HR voice in the academic community, speaks of HR 's history in the singular. "We have a great heritage", he recently said about HR (Bates, 2002, p. 32). As we look to the past, however, we find no unitary history. HR 's great heritage is neither singular nor linear; it is comprised of diverse traditions and histories, making the phrase "great heritages" more accurate. The different heritages of HR reflect different interests and concerns, some of which may be comfortably reconciled and some of which may not be.
According to Manzini (2002), the role of Human Resource Planning has now evolved into an essential long-term planning function of any business. Certainly, the absence of good human capital resourcing practices may lead to dysfunctional or negative organisational outcomes resulting in high turnover rates which can be financially costly (Noe et al., 2004).
This is an analysis of the Harvard Business School case study -- Sonoco Products Company (A): Building a World-Class HR Organization. This analysis outlines the challenges of Sonoco Products Company to revise its corporate strategy (i.e. products, structure, Human Resources, etc.) to remain competitive and continue its growth in the volatile, ever-changing global packaging industry. In 1995, Cindy Hartley, Senior VP, Human Resources, came to Sonoco and found the Human Resources (HR) function broken. She soon began working on a plan to rejuvenate HR and link HR processes to Sonoco’s business objectives. As Ms. Hartley was well on
This report gives us in-depth knowledge on how important is to realise the comparisons between an organisation strategies, the structure followed by HRM practises; which compromises the three elements to Human Resource Management. Throughout the report, there will be a brief and descriptive definition of what the three elements are followed by explanations and examples to support the argument being presented here. Limitations of diagrams and screenshots will be presented as well for better understanding of what is being put forward. The research that has been conducted here, gives us an indication on how human resources can be a very effective and powerful area within a workforce; HR is the core of a company because without this department, there will be no employees. The major areas that will be discussed are: *Avenues for