Habsburg Monarchy

The aim of this report is to present the findings of how a Participative Leadership (PL) style could work in the Hospitality industry. This will also include research on the advantages and challenges of implementing this style; and how it would aid effective kitchen communication and human resource management. What is Participative Leadership? Participative Style is where decisions are made with the most feasible amount of participation from those who are affected by the leaders’ decision (Grimsley

According to Aquinas the best form of Earthly government is the presence of a monarch within a state. Monarchies have power over everyone yet justice belongs to all equally. Aquinas’s position on the best earthly form of government derives from his strong position on natural law and moral value. Aquinas believes that a monarchy is the best-suited form of government because it is natural for one person to govern over others. He pushes the idea that a monarch should be wise and just within its approach

Queens played a very important role in medieval history. They had many tasks to complete in the day. Queens could be linked to king through marriage, family, and property, queens were vital to the Monarchy. They don’t just stand around looking pretty queens had several responsibilities during the day! Queens had to help the king and other nobility find ways to spy on rivals, ignite conflicts, and simply spread important gossip.They were often mothers who had to take care of a child or childs.Queens

Both Locke and Machiavelli share the philosophy of improving the establishment but their point of views regarding the nature of good rule varies. Machiavelli presents a rather extreme notion of the Prince disregarding individual rights for the benefit of the principality. He justifies these violations of rights, by implementing that it is necessary in order to maintain order and power. Machiavelli’s idea of the nature of good rule benefited the society of that specific time period through the means

Machiavelli and Socrates Socrates and Niccolò Machiavelli lived in two very different, yet similar time periods. Socrates was born in 469 B.C. and Machiavelli was born in 1469. Even though these time periods are very far apart, they both lived in a time of war and political fragmentation. I believe that Socrates would not support Machiavelli’s ideas presented in The Prince and the political system that it would lead to. I believe that Socrates would not support these ideas for multiple reasons:

Shakespeare’s plays, Henry IV, Part 1 (1H4) and Macbeth (Mac.), support the Tudor myth through the representation of monarchy and the theme of a king’s divinity. From a historical perspective, Shakespeare portrays Henry IV and his descendants as unworthy of kingship as Henry IV disrupts the divine right of kings and thus instigates the Tudor myth. This representation is implemented in order to appease Elizabeth I through affirming her sanctioned appointment to the throne. The depiction of kingship

and Queen Isabella have more fame and fortune would make their monarchy look more powerful to others. Columbus was supported by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella because they believed that they would benefit and Spain would benefit from his voyages. They supported Columbus because Ferdinand and Isabella would revive 9/10 tenths of his profits from the voyage. Columbus wanted fame and fortune but that wasn’t really what the Spanish monarchy wanted to offer. In Columbus business contract it states,"that

Thomas Hobbes once said, “The first and fundamental law of Nature, which is, to seek peace and follow it.” He wanted us to seek peace because as individuals in society he wanted us to live together in peace. His belief was to circumvent the menace and have fear of civil dispute. However, when we don't fulfill are part in circumventing the menace Hobbes explained it as if when two or more people desire the same thing, people will then become enemies and try to put more of an effort into destroying

issues that the lower class faces every day. He ineffectively governs, failing to consider the needs of all people. King Arthur’s interactions with the lower class and his inability to understand peasants’ lifestyles demonstrate the flaws of the monarchy system. Hank, on one hand, wants to infiltrate the lower class so that he can observe first-hand the effects of his innovations on the lifestyle of the common man. In contrast, the king goes along simply for the purpose of enjoyment. Hank narrates

showed some similarities in term of ideals, but more important differences on the method of application. And this contrast in again portrayed in their use of religion but also in the monarch himself. The exercise of religion in an absolute monarchy was only made to legitimate the monarch. Kings in France were said to be chosen by God to represent Him on earth. As argued by Jacques Bossuet “ Monarchical authority comes from God”. It was during the coronation ceremony in 1654 at Reims cathedral