Principles of Instrumental Analysis
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781305577213
Author: Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter A1, Problem A1.20QAP
Interpretation Introduction
Interpretation:
The pH meter of range 2-12 can read standard deviation of
Concept introduction:
The following formula will be used for the calculation of the standard deviation in terms of antilogarithm-
Where,
Or,
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
A method for the detection of morphine is used to generate a calibration curve in which the assay response (y) is plotted versus morphine concentration (x, in mg/L). This gives a straight line with a slope (m) of 0.241 and a y-intercept (b) of 0.011, where y = mx + b. The slope of this line has a standard deviation of ±0.007, and the standard deviation of the intercept is ±0.006. If the sample from an athlete gives a response of 0.506 ± 0.013 in this method, what is the concentration of morphine in the sample and estimated precision of this concentration?
The pH of a solution is 6.70 ± 0.02. What is the concentration of H+ in the solution and its absolute uncertainty?
(H*] =
M
±
M
The protein concentration of a protein isolate was determined using the Bradford assay. Five dilution of bovine serum albumin (BSA) were prepared from a 5.00 mg/mL
BSA stock solution. To these dilutions, 100 µl of Bradford reagent were added. After 5 minutes, the absorbance was taken at 595 nm.
Standard #
BSA,
in mg/mL
Volume of Bradford reagent, A595
in mL
1
5.0
0.000
1.00
5.0
0.134
3
2.00
5.0
0.265
4
3.00
5.0
0.388
4.00
5.0
0.497
The supernatant dilution was prepared by mixing 49 µL of the protein isolate with 16 µL water. The absorbance was taken 5 minutes after addition of 100 mL Bradford
reagent. Calculate the protein concentration (in mg/mL) of the original isolate if the absorbance at 595 nm was 0.413.
Note: Final answer format must be x.xxx (three decimal places). Round off only in the final answer. Do not round off in the middle of calculation.
Chapter A1 Solutions
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Ch. A1 - Prob. A1.1QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.2QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.3QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.4QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.5QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.6QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.7QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.8QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.9QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.10QAP
Ch. A1 - Prob. A1.11QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.12QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.13QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.14QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.15QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.16QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.17QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.18QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.19QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.20QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.21QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.22QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.23QAPCh. A1 - Prob. A1.24QAP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- To determine the molar concentration of a metal ion in a solution of unknown concentration, a student fırst made five standard solutions that contain the metal ion of interest and measured the absorbance of each solution in a spectrophotometer at its Amax- A calibration curve was obtained that had an equation of y = 5.747 x + 0.013 Next, the student pipetted 15.0 mL of the initial solution of unknown concentration into a 100.0 mL volumetric flask, and filled the flask with deionized water to the line. The absorbance of this final diluted solution was found to be A = 0.226 at Amax. The color of the original and diluted solution was blue. What is the molarity of the original solution, as well as an approximate Amax for this metal ion? 2max = 599 nm and concentration is 0.247 M Amax 457 nm and concentration is 0.247 M %3D 2 max = 457 nm and concentration is 0.0371 M 1 max 599 nm and concentration is 0.0371 M Amax = 599 nm and concentration is 0.00557 Marrow_forwardNormality of a solution was determined by five different titrations. The results were 9.5 mL, 8.5 mL, 9.1 mL, 9.3 mL, and 9.1 mL. Calculate the mean, median and standard deviation of this dataarrow_forwardWhat are the differences between systematic and random errors and how do they effect accuracy and precision? In what circumstances would you use standard addition (versus a normal calibration curve) to determine the amount of an analyte in a sample? A urine sample, containing analyte Z is analysed by the standard addition method where 5 mL of the original sample was mixed with increasing amounts of a Z standard and each solution diluted to a volume of 50 mL prior to analysis. A plot of the final concentration of the standard in each of the 50 mL samples (x axis) versus The measured signal from the analysis of each 50 mL sample (on y axis) produced a straight line with the general equation: y = 44.72x + 4.06 what was the final concentration of Z in the 50 mL standard addition sample? what was the initial concentration of Z in the original urine sample?arrow_forward
- (a) For use in an iodine titration, you prepare a solution from 0.222 2 (+0.000 2) g of KIO3 [FM 214.001 0 (+0.000 9)] in 50.00 (+0.05) mL. Find the molarity and its uncertainty with an appropriate number of significant figures. (b) Would your answer be affected significantly if the reagent were only 99.9% pure?arrow_forwardA solution is prepared by weighing 5.0000 g of cesium iodide into a 100-mL volumetric flask. The balance used has a precision of 0.2 mg reported as a standard deviation, and the volumetric flask could be filled with a precision of 0.15mL also reported as a standard deviation. What is the estimated standard deviation of concentration (g/mL)?arrow_forwardAfter determining the absorbance of several standards of known concentration, the trend line for a calibration curve plotting absorbance (y-axis) against concentration (uM, x-axis) is determined to be y=4.244x+0.0000. The absorbance of a solution of unknown concentration is determined to be 0.604. Calculate the concentration of the unknown solution in microM. Give answer to 3 decimal placesarrow_forward
- If the pH of a solution is 2.78 with an absolute uncertainty of ±0.05, what is the [H+] and its uncertainty? O [H+] = 1.66 x 10-3 M uncertainty in the concentration O [H+] = 1.66 x 10-3 M uncertainty in the concentration O [H+] = 1.34 x 10-4 M uncertainty in the concentration 1.78 x 10-5 M O [H+] 1.33 x 10 M -4 uncertainty in the concentration= 1.91 x 10-4 M -1.25 x 10-5 M 1.65 x 10-5 Marrow_forwardSuppose that a lead determination has a standard deviation of 3 mg. If the sample has a mean value of 60 mg, the CV is 5%. For a sample containing only 15 mg, the CV isarrow_forwardA titrimetric method for the determination of calcium in limestone was tested with the analysis of a NIST limestone containing 30.15% CaO. The mean of the four analyzes is 30.26% CaO with a standard deviation of 0.085%. From the data accumulated from many analyzes, s→ϭ=0.094% CaO was found.a) Do the data indicate the presence of systematic error at the 95% confidence level?b) When a value for ϭ is unknown, do the data show a systematic error at the 95% confidence level?arrow_forward
- The density of kerosene is 0.810 g/mL and was measured using a hydrometer with a standard deviation of ±0.015. Calculate the volume and propagate the error if the mass of the kerosene is 1.67 g.arrow_forward8) Two different analytical methods are compared for determining Ca. The following are two sets of data. Set 1 Set 2 155.779 155.784 155.787 155.787 155.813 155.765 155.781 155.793 i. i. Determine the mean and the standard deviation in Set 1. Calculate the 95% confidence limit for data in Set 1. Identify a possible outlier in Set 2. Use the Q-test to determine whether it can be retained or rejected at 95% confidence level. ii.arrow_forwardA solution of Ba (OH), was standardized against 0.1208 g of primary-standard-grade benzoic acid, C6H5 COOH (122.12 g/mol). An end point was observed after addition of 43.94 mL of base. a. Calculate the molar concentration of the base. Concentration M b. Calculate the standard deviation of the molar concentration if the standard deviation for the mass measurement was ±0.4 mg and that for the volume measurement was +0.02 mL. Standard deviation M c. Assuming an error of -0.3 mg in the mass measurement, calculate the absolute and relative systematic error in the molar concentration. Absolute systematic error = M Relative systematic error = |pptarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you