MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337613057
Author: Tucker
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 9.4, Problem 1YTE
To determine
The new equilibrium level of
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The country is experiencing a serious rise in inflation which the government wants to control through fiscal policy. The Government will decrease spending by $20 million and increase taxes by $15 million. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.80. What will be the effect on GDP and by how much?
A recessionary gap is how much GDP needs to increase from the current GDP to achieve full employment. Let us say that we are experiencing a recessionary gap of $36 million. Also assume that the MPC equals .80. The government decides to decrease taxes in order to close the recessionary gap. What will be the tax decrease?
An inflationary gap is how much GDP needs to decrease from the current GDP to maintain employment while avoiding inflation. Let us say that we are experiencing an inflationary gap of $200 million. The government decides to increase taxes. Assume that the MPC equals .80. What will be the tax increase?
d. The government wants to achieve a balanced budget. It, therefore,…
The country is experiencing a serious rise in inflation which the government wants to control through fiscal policy. The Government will decrease spending by $20 million and increase taxes by $15 million. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.80. What will be the effect on GDP and by how much?
A recessionary gap is how much GDP needs to increase from the current GDP to achieve full employment. Let us say that we are experiencing a recessionary gap of $36 million. Also assume that the MPC equals .80. The government decides to decrease taxes in order to close the recessionary gap. What will be the tax decrease?
An inflationary gap is how much GDP needs to decrease from the current GDP to maintain employment while avoiding inflation. Let us say that we are experiencing an inflationary gap of $200 million. The government decides to increase taxes. Assume that the MPC equals .80. What will be the tax increase?
d. The government wants to achieve a balanced budget. It therefore…
Illustrate the impact of a $500 million increase in government spending by adjusting the graph. In the full Keynesian model, the marginal propensity to save (MPS) is 0.25.
Aggregate expenditure (in millions of dollars)Aggregate income = real GDP (in millions of dollars)AE = AIC+I+G+X−M
What is the resulting change in output?
Output decreases by $2,000 million, or $2 billion.
Output increases by $500 million×1.33$500 million×1.33 , or $666.6 million.
Output decreases by $500 million×1.33$500 million×1.33 , or $666.6 million.
Output increases by $2,000 million, or $2 billion.
If the government cut taxes by $500 million instead, what would be the resulting change in output?
Output decreases by $1,500 million, or $1.5 billion.
Output increases by $666.6 million.
Output increases by $1,500 million, or $1.5 billion.
Output decreases by $500 million×0.25$500 million×0.25 , or $125 million.
Chapter 9 Solutions
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Ch. 9.4 - Prob. 1YTECh. 9 - Prob. 1SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 2SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 3SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 4SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 5SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 6SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 7SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 8SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 9SQP
Ch. 9 - Prob. 10SQPCh. 9 - Prob. 1SQCh. 9 - Prob. 2SQCh. 9 - Prob. 3SQCh. 9 - Prob. 4SQCh. 9 - Prob. 5SQCh. 9 - Prob. 6SQCh. 9 - Prob. 7SQCh. 9 - Prob. 8SQCh. 9 - Prob. 9SQCh. 9 - Prob. 10SQCh. 9 - Prob. 11SQCh. 9 - Prob. 12SQCh. 9 - Prob. 13SQCh. 9 - Prob. 14SQCh. 9 - Prob. 15SQCh. 9 - Prob. 16SQCh. 9 - Prob. 17SQCh. 9 - Prob. 18SQCh. 9 - Prob. 19SQCh. 9 - Prob. 20SQ
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The country is experiencing a serious rise in inflation which the government wants to control through fiscal policy. The Government will decrease spending by $20 million and increase taxes by $15 million. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.80. What will be the effect on GDP and by how much? A recessionary gap is how much GDP needs to increase from the current GDP to achieve full employment. Let's say that we are experiencing a recessionary gap of $36 million. Also assume that the MPC equals .80. The government decides to decrease taxes to close the recessionary gap. How much will be the tax decrease? An inflationary gap is how much GDP needs to decrease from the current GDP to maintain employment while avoiding inflation. Let's say that we are experiencing an inflationary gap of $200 million. The government decides to increase taxes. Assume the MPC equals .80. How much will the tax increase be? The government wants to achieve a balanced budget. It therefore increases…arrow_forwardMacmillan Learning What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government increases its purchases of goods and services by $60,000? Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75. What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government, instead of changing its spending, increases transfers by $60,000? Assume the MPC has not changed. An increase in government transfers or taxes, as opposed to an increase in government purchases of goods and services, will result in O no change to real GDP. O a smaller eventual effect on real GDP. a larger eventual effect on real GDP. O an identical eventual effect on real GDP.arrow_forwardYou are provided with the following information about an imaginary economy called Keynesia: Government expenditure 400 Exports 250 Autonomous imports 50 Autonomous consumption 150 Investment expenditure 300 Full- employment output 1900 Marginal propensity to consume 0.75 Marginal propensity to import 0.15 Tax rate 0.25 Required (I) Derive the IS equation (ii) Derive the savings function (iii) Calculate the equilibrium level of income using the aggregate expenditure approach. (iv) What would the value of income be if the trade balance is zero? (v) What would the value of income be if autonomous consumption increases by 50arrow_forward
- From March 2020 to March 2021, the US enacted three fiscal packages to stimulate the economy and support businesses and households following the dislocations of COVID19. The rationale for these temporary payments was based on the Keynesian consumption function, according to which an increase in income increases consumption spending and boosts the economy. The data shown in the chart on the next page for disposable income, with and without the stimulus payments, and personal consumption expenditures. While disposable income clearly rises substantially when the stimulus payments are included, personal consumption expenditures follows a different path, mimicking disposable income without the stimulus payments. Use economic theory to explain what is going on here, Billions of Dollars 22,000 Disposable Personal Income less Economic Impact Payments Disposable Personal Income with Economic impact Payments 20,000 Personal Consumption Expenditures 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 01 04 07 10 01 04…arrow_forwardThe graph below shows a 45°-line (Keynesian cross) diagram. The economy is currently in macroeconomic equilibrium at output level Yo. Suppose that investment increases. 1) Use the line tool to show a possible position for the new aggregate expenditures line. Label this line AE2. Note: if you are not prompted for a label, you have used the wrong drawing tool. 2) Use the point drawing tool to show the new equilibrium levels of GDP and expenditures.Label this point 'B'. Real aggregate expenditures, AE Real GDP, Y Y = AE AE0 Qarrow_forwardAssume the Potential GDP is $15 trillion dollars. Use the table below to answer the following questions. Assume all values represent trillions of dollars. Use the table to create two graphs: 1. aggregate expenditure model and 2. an aggregate supply aggregate demand model. Note that the equilibrium in the table above will determine your real GDP and your potential GDP should be plotted in both graphs. What type of macroeconomic equilibrium does this economy reflect? Note that the multiplier is 2 because this economy has imports. If Investment expenditures increase by $2.5, how much does GDP increase? Does the increase in investment expenditures from part C result in a full employment equilibrium? Why? Graphically show the effects from part C in our Aggregate Expenditure Model and Aggregate Supply-Aggregate Demand Model.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
