Concept explainers
First Paradox: Under certain circumstances, you have your best chance of winning a tennis
tournament if you play most of your games against the best possible opponent.
Alice and her two sisters, Betty and Carol, are avid tennis players. Betty is the best of the three sisters, and Carol plays at the same level as Alice. Alice defeats Carol 50% of the time but only defeats Betty 40% of the time.
Alice’s mother offers to give her $100 if she can win two consecutive games when playing three alternating games against her two sisters. Since the games will alternate, Alice has two possibilities for the sequence of opponents. One possibility is to play the first game against Betty, followed by a game with Carol, and then another game with Betty. We will refer to this sequence as BCB. The other possible sequence is CBC.
Calculate the probability of Alice getting the $100 reward if she chooses the sequence BCB.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 6 Solutions
Finite Mathematics & Its Applications (12th Edition)
- Bob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games.To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage.It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 60% of the time; he wins 60% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 60% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage.Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in the…arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 70% of the time; he wins 80% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 90% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive game won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in…arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 60% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 40% of the time; he wins 70% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 70% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in…arrow_forward
- Bob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 80% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 40% of the time; he wins 70% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 90% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for system, and determine the proportion games that Doug will win the long…arrow_forwardBob and Doug play a lot of Ping-Pong, but Doug is a much better player, and wins 80% of their games. To make up for this, if Doug wins a game he will spot Bob five points in their next game. If Doug wins again he will spot Bob ten points the next game, and if he still wins the next game he will spot him fifteen points, and continue to spot him fifteen points as long as he keeps winning. Whenever Bob wins a game he goes back to playing the next game with no advantage. It turns out that with a five-point advantage Bob wins 20% of the time; he wins 50% of the time with a ten-point advantage and 80% of the time with a fifteen-point advantage. Model this situation as a Markov chain using the number of consecutive games won by Doug as the states. There should be four states representing zero, one, two, and three or more consecutive games won by Doug. Find the transition matrix of this system, the steady-state vector for the system, and determine the proportion of games that Doug will win in…arrow_forward2. Three friends pooled their money to purchase a new game system that costs $196. Friend #2 contributed $8 more than Friend #1. Friend #3 contributed $22 less than Friend #1. How much did each of the friends contribute to the purchase?arrow_forward
- Suppose you decided to play a gambling game. In order to play the game there is a $1.50 dollar fee to play. If you roll a 1, 2, or 3 you win nothing (i.e., your net profit is $-1.50). If you roll a 4 or 5, you win $3.50 (i.e., your net profit is $2.00). If you roll a 6 you win $5.00 (i.e., your net profit is $3.50).Use the information described above to construct a probability distribution table for the random variable xx which represents the net profit of your winnings. Note: Be sure to enter your probabilities as reduced fractions. Die Roll xx P(x) Roll a 1, 2, or 3 Roll a 4 or 5 Roll a 6 Find the amount you would expect to win or lose each time you played the game. Round your final answer to two decimal places.μ=arrow_forwardProblem. Two players A and B play a fair game such that the player who wins a total of 6 rounds first wins a prize. Suppose the game unexpectedly stops when A has won a total of 5 rounds and B has won a total of 3 rounds. How should the prize be divided between A and B?arrow_forwardSuppose you decided to play a gambling game. In order to play the game there is a $1.50 dollar fee to play. If you roll a 1, 2, or 3 you win nothing (i.e., your net profit is $-1.5 dollars). If you roll a 4 or 5, you win $2.50 (i.e., your net profit is $1). If you roll a 6 you win $5.75 (i.e., your net profit is $4.25).a) Use the information described above to constuct a probability distribution table for the random variable xx which represents the net profit of your winnings. Note: Be sure to enter your probabilities as reduced fractions. xx P(x)P(x) (You roll a 1,2,or 3) (You roll a 1,2, or 3) (You roll a 4 or 5) (You roll a 4 or 5) (You roll a 6) (You roll a 6) b) Find the amount you would expect to win or lose each time you played the game. Round your final answer to two decimal places.μ=arrow_forward
- Avicenna, an insurance company, offers five-year commercial property insurance policies to small businesses. If the holder of one of these policies experiences property damage in the next five years, the company must pay out $26,500 to the policy holder. Executives at Avicenna are considering offering these policies for $497 each. Suppose that for each holder of a policy there is a 2% chance they will experience property damage in the next five years and a 98% chance they will not.(If necessary, consult a list of formulas.) If the executives at Avicenna know that they will sell many of these policies, should they expect to make or lose money from offering them? How much? To answer, take into account the price of the policy and the expected value of the amount paid out to the holder. Avicenna can expect to make money from offering these policies. In the long run, they should expect to makedollars on each policy sold. Avicenna can…arrow_forwardNigel and Sofia play the following game. Each of them roll a fair six-sided die once. IfSofia’s number is greater than or equal to Nigel’s number, she wins the game. But ifSofia rolled a number smaller than Nigel’s number, then Nigel rolls again. If Nigel’ssecond roll gives a number that is less than or equal to Sofia’s number, the game endswith a draw. If Nigel’s second roll gives a number larger than Sofia’s number, Nigelwins the game.Find the probability that Nigel wins the game and the probability that Sofia wins thegame.arrow_forward2.)A jar contains 2 red, 3 green, and 6 blue marbles. In a game a player closes their eyes, reaches into the jar and randomly chooses two marbles. The player wins the game if at least one of their marbles is red. Suppose it costs $1 to play the game and the winning prize is $3. Mathematically analyze this game and determine if it is in your financial interest to play the game.arrow_forward
- Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt