The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called “closing the Washington Monument.” When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 6 Solutions
Principles of Economics 2e
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
Financial Accounting (12th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
Managerial Accounting (4th Edition)
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
Horngren's Accounting (11th Edition)
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
- On Sundays, people in Los Angeles consider a boat to Catalina Island to spend the day on the beach there. The utility that a person gets from visiting Catalina is 1-[n/10] – p , where n is the number of visitors on the island and p is the price of round-trip transportation (by boat). (Note that a visitor obtains more satisfaction if there are fewer other visitors on the island). The utility of staying home is zero. In equilibrium, how many people visit the island on a given Sunday? ( Your answer should depend on p.)arrow_forwardThe rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In the discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called closing the Washington monument. When agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a Budget cut, it may decide to close a high visibility attraction enjoyed by many people like the Washington monument. Explain in the terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington monument strategy is so misleading if you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with the highest marginal utility or the lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington monument strategy cut the items with the highest or lowest.arrow_forwardQuestion 10 Which of the following startements about network externalities is CORRECT? Air pollution is an example of a network externality. For a good with network externalities, the number of people who are willing to buy a unit of the good is uniquely determined by the price. Network externalities are always positive. The manufacturer of a new good with network externalities might give away a free version of the good. For a good with network externalities, one person's valuation of the good is always increasing in the number of other people using the good.arrow_forward
- 4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…arrow_forward4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…arrow_forwardLorena's income and the cost of other types of entertainment-in particular, how much it costs to go see a movie instead of playing golf. The three demand schedules in the table below show how many rounds of golf per year Lorena will demand at each price under three different scenarios. In scenario D1, Lorena's income is $50,000 per year and movies cost $9 each. In scenario D2, Lorena's income is also $50,000 per year, but the price of seeing a movie rises to $11. And in scenario D3, Lorena's income goes up to $70,000 per year, while movies cost $11. D1 Scenario D2 D3 Income per year $50,000 $50,000 $70,000 Price of movie ticket $9 $11 $11 Quantity Demanded Price of Golf $50 15 10 15 $35 25 15 30 $20 40 20 50 Instructions: Round your answers to 2 decimal places. If you are entering any negative numbers be sure to include a negative sign () in front of those numbers. a. Using the data under Di and D2, calculate the cross elasticity of Lorena's demand for golf at all three prices. (To do…arrow_forward
- Donuts are a big thing in Portland, OR. You go into one of the many donut establishments to purchase some number of these tasty (and even vegan or gluten free if required) treats. Let's say that the first donut has higher utility for you, so you are willing to pay up to $2 for it. For the second donut you are willing to pay $1.50, the third $1, a fourth $0.50 and the fifth $0.00. This particular bakery in Portland charges an average of $1 per donut. If you are a rational buyer (which can be hard when faced with so many different delicious donuts) then how many donuts do you purchase, and how much consumer surplus (i.e., money saved compared to what you were willing to spend) do you have? O 4 donuts, $5 O 2 donuts, $5 O 3 donuts, $1.50 O 1 donut, $0.50arrow_forwardSuppose Mr. and Mrs. Ward agreed not to vote in tomorrow’s election. Would such an agreement improve utility? Would such an agreement be an equilibrium?arrow_forwardHal's utility function is U (x, y) = 2x + 5y. The price of x is $4, and the price of y is $15. Hal has $200 a week to spend on x and y. Hal is offered a chance to join a club of consumers of good y. If he joins, he can get y at a price of $8. What is the most that Hal would be willing to pay to join the club?arrow_forward
- For the next three questions, assume that there are two consumers in an economy that have utility functions UA(2,3)=2¹/42/4 U" (x,y)=1¹/2¹/2 The two consumers begin with equal endowments of the two goods === e = 50 29. If the price of z and y were both set to 1, there would be (a) An excess demand for r so the equilibrium price ratio must be less than 1 (b) An excess supply of r so the equilibrium price ratio must be less than 1 (c) An excess demand for y so the equilibrium price ratio must be greater than 1 (d) An excess supply of y so the equilibrium price ratio must be greater than 1 (e) No excess supply or demand for either good, so the equilibrium price ratio is 1 30. What is the equilibrium price ratio? (a) 2/3 (b) 5/2 (c) 3/5 (d) 1 (e) None of these 31. Consumer A increases his endowment of both goods to 100 (e = e = 100). This will cause (a) No change in the equilibrium price ratio (b) The equilibrium price ratio to increase, causing consumer B to decrease their consumption of…arrow_forwardYou were presented with a utility maximizing rule which states: If you always choose the item with the greatest marginal utility per dollar spent, when your budget is exhausted, the utility maximizing choice should occur where the marginal utility per dollar spent is the same for both goods. That rule is expressed as follows: Group of answer choices (The marginal utility associated with good 1 / the price of good 2) = (the marginal utility associated with good 2 / the price of good 1) % change in price / % change in quantity (The marginal utility associated with good 1 / the price of good 1) = (the marginal utility associated with good 2 / the price of good 2) The marginal utility per dollar of good 1 > the marginal utility per dollar of good 2.arrow_forwardMatthew Hamming is stranded on an island. He has decided that he will spend exactly 10 hours a day gathering food. He can either spend this time gathering coconuts or catching fish. He can catch 2 fish per hour and he can gather 3 coconuts per hour. Matthew's utility function is U(FC) = 3F0.60.3 a. How many fish should Matthew catch and how many coconuts should he gather so that his consumption maximizes his utility? Illustrate the equilibrium with a graph b. One day a native inhabitant of another island arrives on the island. The visitor offers Matthew trade of 3 fish for 1 coconut. The trade fee costs 1 fish (that must be paid prior to the exchange). Will Matthew decide to trade? What will Matthew produce and consume? Justify your answer and provide a graph.arrow_forward