a)
The supply curve derivation for hospitals 1 and 2.
a)
Explanation of Solution
Consider the profit of hospital over the two-year period as follows:
Where,
Then, rewrite the profit equation as follows:
Differentiate q1 by keeping q2 as constant to obtain as follows:
Differentiate q2 by keeping q1 as constant to obtain as follows:
The derivative of profit will be zero for profit maximizing. Then, equate the supply function as follows:
b)
The supply curve derivation for hospitals 1 and 2.
b)
Explanation of Solution
Consider the profit of hospital over the two-year period as follows:
Where,
Then, rewrite the profit equation as follows:
Differentiate q2 by keeping q1 as constant to obtain as follows:
Substitute this in the equation for profit to obtain as follows:
c)
Identify the patients rush in period 1 if there is a possibility of learning by doing.
c)
Explanation of Solution
The hospital will see more patients at the period one if there is learning by doing as per the equation of supply.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- The insured population requiring care from the health services falls into one of two groups (pathologies to treat): type A and type B patients. Let's assume that there is only one patient per group. So, there are patients of one type (A) with a disease that reduces their health status in 5 QALYS, and there are patients of another type (B) with an illness that reduces their health status in 3 QALYS. Several drugs are available to the population. The more expensive they are, the greater their efficacy and the greater the number of QALYS gained. The price of a drug is related to its effectiveness and the price of the drug rises by one monetary unit for each additional QALY it provides. Therefore, to be able to restore their health, type A patients need a drug priced at 5 monetary units, and type B patients need a drug priced at 3 monetary units. Both patients (A and B) have the same income, 10 monetary units. What sacrifice, in welfare units per QALY, must a type B patient endure to be…arrow_forwardYou have been recruited as an expert in health economics to recommend what is the best therapy for a group of patients. In the image below you will find the decision tree showing the probabilities for different health states and outcomes for patients undergoing two possible treatments, No drug therapy and Drug therapy. Based on the expected cost, which therapy would you recommend as the least expensive? Explain how you arrived at your recommendation and show your calculations the space provided. No drug theraphy ? Drug theraphy ? HEALTH STATES PROBABILITIES Remain in Good Health 0.5 Develop disease A 0.2 Develop disease B 0.2 Die 0.1 Remain in Good Health 0.53 Develop disease A 0.16 Develop disease B 0.22 Die 0.09 OUTCOMES (Costs) $0 $400 $300 $200 SO $800 $500 $0arrow_forwardSuppose that in the fictional country ASU in 2012, a mandate was passed where everyone between the ages of 23-25 will receive health insurance at a discounted rate, while individuals aged 27-29 were not impacted by this policy. You, a researcher, want to study the effect of offering discounted health insurance coverage on the use of mental health services. You have data on the average number of visits for these two age groups over time. Using the information in the table below, a quick difference-in-difference calculation suggests that the mandate led to Time Periods Age group Avg. Avg. Number of Number of visits visits Pre-2012. Post-2012 23 to 25 2.3 27 to 29 2.5 approximately 0.3 more visits. approximately 0.7 more visits. approximately 0.4 fewer visits. approximately 0.7 fewer visits. approximately 0.3 fewer visits. 020202 337 SUCHARY 3.0 2.9 P 1302 126 70 5572 25 20120822 2012 Carrow_forward
- Suppose that you conduct a survey and collect data on people's health insurance plan (HMO, PPO, Fee-for-service). You plot the information and find that people who have less restrictive health insurance plans also have higher health care expenditures. From this information you a. cannot tell if this is due to the structure of the plan or if higher risk individuals opt into less restrictive plans. b. conclude that higher risk individuals opt into less restrictive insurance plans. c. conclude that less restrictive health insurance plans leads to higher health expenditures.arrow_forwardAn important distinction in health insurance is between the list price (PL) and out-of-pocket price (PP) of a medical good or service. The list price is the official price that the provider charges the insurance company, while the out-of-pocket price is the price that the insurance customer faces. Sometimes, the out-of-pocket price depends on the list price. Now assume the consumer is part of a partial insurance plan with a coinsurance provision. Her insurance pays 50% of all medical expenses. Consider again the relationship between PL and PP and plot a coinsurance plan demand curve in PL - Q space. Label this curve D3. Finally, assume the consumer is part of a partial insurance plan with a copayment provision. Her insurance pays all expenses above and beyond her copayment of $25 for each unit of Q. Consider again the relationship between PL and PP and plot a copayment-plan demand curve in PL - Q space. Label this curve D4.arrow_forwardWhich statement about the individual health insurance market in the U.S. is correct? Question options: 1) Among the non-elderly with private health insurance, about one-third now purchase it in the individual market 2) Individual market enrollment increased with implementation of the Affordable Care Act in 2014, but it has declined in every year since 3) According to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, On-Exchange enrollment has been roughly constant (varied by less than 1 million) since 2015 4) According to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, Off-Exchange enrollment has grown relative to On-Exchange since 2015arrow_forward
- According to Barr, the SES into which you were born and spent your childhood has more predictive power for health as an adult than does your SES category as an adult. True Falsearrow_forwardOne major premise of the Rothschild-Stiglitz (RS) model is that there is a perfectly competitive market for health insurance. Suppose instead that the market is not perfectly competitive, and in fact competitor firms have a hard time entering the market. Could a pooling equilibrium occur in this case? What is it about competition that prevents pooling in the RS model? No formal proof is necessary, but do make your reasoning clear. Evaluate the following statement: competition in health insurance markets is harmful.arrow_forwardOne major premise of the Rothschild–Stiglitz model is that there is a perfectly competitive market for health insurance. Suppose instead that the market is not perfectly competitive, and in fact competitor firms have a hard time entering the market. Could a pooling equilibrium occur in this case? What is it about competition that prevents pooling in the Rothschild–Stiglitz model? No formal proof is necessary, but do make your reasoning clear. Evaluate the following statement: competition in health insurance markets is harmful.arrow_forward
- Suppose that every driver faces a 1% probability of an automobile accident every year. An accident will, on average, cost each driver $10,000. Suppose there are two types of individuals: those with $60,000 in the bank and those with $5,000 in the bank. Assume that individuals with $5,000 in the bank declare bankruptcy if they get in an accident. In bankruptcy, creditors receive only what individuals have in the bank. What is the actuarially fair price of insurance? What price are individuals with $5,000 in the bank willing to pay for the insurance? Will those with $5,000 in the bank voluntarily purchase insurance? What is the effect of state laws forcing individuals to purchase auto liability insurance?arrow_forwardSuppose that your utility function over health care (h) and other goods (c) is given by U(h, c) and that you have a fixed income of $100. (Assume that the indifference curves of your utility function bear the usual convex shape.) Each year, you choose h and c to maximize your utility subject to a budget constraint: phh+pcc=Ywhere ph is the price of health care, pc is the price of other goods, and Y is your income. In year 1, the price of health care is $1, while the price of other goods is $2. At these prices, you demand 30 units of health care and 35 units of other goods. In year 2, your utility function and your income do not change, but prices do. Health care becomes more expensive at $1.50, while other goods become cheaper at $1.50. At these prices, you demand 20 units of health care. a. Assuming you spend all your income in year 2, how many units of other goods do you buy?b. Draw a graph with your demand for health care on the horizontal axis and your demand for other goods on the…arrow_forwardAn empirically testable hypothesis for additional health care expenditure as an investment rather than as an expense is: a. If an increase in health care expenditure today results in an increase in productivity tomorrow, then health careexpenditure has an investment effect. b. If an increase in health care expenditure today results in an a rise in health care stock prices, then health care expenditure has an investment effect. c. If an increase in health care expenditure today results in worse health outcomes today, then health care expenditure has an investment effect. d. If an increase in health care expenditure today results in a more competitive health care market tomorrow, then health care expenditure has an investment effect.arrow_forward