Economics (7th Edition) (What's New in Economics)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134738321
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.4.6PA
Sub part (a):
To determine
The optimal size of the park.
Sub part (b):
To determine
The optimal size of the park.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider a town with three residents. The residents' demand curves for various acres of a
public park are shown below. The public's willingness to pay for the 4th acre of parkland is
Price (S)
12
12
10
CO
8
2
6
Price ($)
12
12
10
8
2
Price (S)
12
10
2
8
6
0 2 4 6 8 10
Citizen X's Demand
0 2 4 6 8 10
Citizen Y's Demand
0 2 4 6 8 10
Citizen Z's Demand
$14
$26
$8
520
11-) Andrew, Beth, and Cathy live in Lindhville. Andrew’s demand for bike paths, a public good, is given by Q = 12–2P. Beth’s demand is Q = 18–P, and Cathy’s is Q = 8–P/3. The marginal cost of building a bike path is MC = 21. The town government decides to use the following procedure for deciding how many paths to build. It asks each resident how many paths they want, and it builds the largest number asked for by any resident. To pay for these paths, it then taxes Andrew, Beth, and Cathy the prices a, b, and c per path, respectively, where a + b + c = MC. (The residents know these tax rates before stating how many paths they want.)A-). If the taxes are set so that each resident shares the cost evenly (a = b = c), how many paths will get built?B) Show that the government can achieve the social optimum by setting the correct tax prices a, b, and c. What prices should it set?
Table 17-1Imagine a small town in which only two residents, Rochelle and Alec, own wells that produce safe drinking water. Each week Rochelle and Alec work together to decide how many gallons of water to pump. They bring the water to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Rochelle and Alec can pump as much water as they want without cost so that the marginal cost of water equals zero. The weekly town demand schedule and total revenue schedule for water is shown in the table below:
Quantity(in gallons)
Price
Total Revenue(and Total Profit)
0
$60
$0
100
55
5,500
200
50
10,000
300
45
13,500
400
40
16,000
500
35
17,500
600
30
18,000
700
25
17,500
800
20
16,000
900
15
13,500
1,000
10
10,000
1,100
5
5,500
1,200
0
0
Refer to Table 17-1. If this market for water were perfectly competitive instead of…
Chapter 5 Solutions
Economics (7th Edition) (What's New in Economics)
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - In a study at a large state university, students...
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1CTECh. 5 - Prob. 5.2CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 9. Efficiency in the presence of externalities Parks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity. Supply (Private Cost) Market Equilibrium Socially Optimal Level Social Value Demand (Private Value) QUANTITY OF PARKS PRICE OF PARKSarrow_forwardQ4. (a) If you are a firm owner who is operating in the perfect competitive market, you areproducing socially efficient outcome. Does it imply that your profits are zero? If you become amonopolist then why do you deviate from the socially efficient outcome? b) In Delhi, as the winter season is approaching, how will it affect the demand function and themarket equilibrium of sweater market? Now after that if the price of wool increases how will themarket equilibrium be affected?arrow_forwardSide 19 A mine owner faces the following marginal cost (MC) function: MC= 100 +15*X Where X is tons of the mineral extracted The mining of the mineral has external costs. The marginal external cost (MEC) has the following function: MEC = 5*X Where X is the tons of the mineral extracted. The (marginal) price curve (PC) has the following function: PC= 600 -5*X Where X is tons of the mineral the bought What is the optimal extraction level in tons? Vælg én svarmulighed O 15 O 18 O 23 O 20arrow_forward
- In 1998, California became the first state to adopt rules requiring many sport utility vehicles, pickups, and minivans to meet the same pollution standards as regular cars, effective in 2004. As the deadline drew near, a business group (which may have an incentive to exaggerate) estimated that using the new technology to reduce pollution would increase vehicle prices by as much as $7,000. A spokesperson for the California Air Resources Board, which imposed the mandate, said that the additional materials cost was only about $70 to $270 per vehicle. Suppose that the two major producers are Toyota and Ford, and these firms were price setters with differentiated products. Show the effect of the new regulation. Is it possible that the price for these vehicles would rise by substantially more than the marginal cost would? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardDraw a graph that models a positive externality in consumption (label and clearly explain graph) Explain: i) The difference between the competitive equilibrium quantity and the socially optimal level quantity. ii) A possible intervention to bring the competitive equilibrium quantity closer to the socially optimal quantity. iii) An example of a setting in which this type of externality might occur (explain clearly how/why this externality happens).arrow_forwardConsider a market with the following supply and demand. (It may help to draw a graph for these questions.) P 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 QS 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 QD 800 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 If there is an external cost of $3, what is the efficient quantity? 500 (already answer) If there is an external benefit of $3, what is the efficient quantity? 700 (already answer) For the remaining questions assume that there is a $3 external COST. If the government wants to get the efficient quantity with a per/unit tax, how much should the tax be? 3 (already answer) Now imagine that they use tradable allowances. If they cap the quantity at 400 what would the value of these allowance be in the market? (Assume the…arrow_forward
- Which of the following policies could help the government achieve the efficient outcome? Check all that apply. Introduce emission taxes Offer a subsidy to consumers equal to the vertical distance between the marginal private benefit curve and the marginal social benefit curve Implement tradable pollution permits Offer a subsidy equal to the price at the efficient outcome Offer a subsidy to producers equal to the vertical distance between the marginal private benefit curve and marginal social benefit curvearrow_forwardParks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.arrow_forwardParks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity. (?) Supply (Private Cost) Market Equilibrium Socially Optimal Level Social Value Demand (Private Value) QUANTITY OF PARKS PRICE OF PARKSarrow_forward
- Use the following diagram of the market for product X to answer the question below. Price Q₁ Qo Q₂ Quantity D₁ Curve S, embodies all costs (including externalities) and D, embodies all benefits (including externalities) associated with the production and consumption of X. Assuming the market equilibrium output is Q₁, we can conclude that the existence of external A) costs has resulted in an underallocation of resources to X. B) costs has resulted in an overallocation of resources to X. C) benefits has resulted in an overallocation of resources to X. D) benefits has resulted in an underallocation of resources to X.arrow_forward2. Given the demand function of motorcycle: Q = 500 – 100P where Q is total quantity demanded (unit: 10,000) and P is daily price (in unit of US$). (1) If the current daily price is US$1.0, please find the total quantity demanded. (2) If the external costs of motorcycle ($2) are all internalized, what would be the total quantity demanded? (3) Please also discuss impacts of this internalization policy on supply, demand and public infrastructures.arrow_forwardConsider a market with the following supply and demand. (It may help to draw a graph for these questions.) P 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 QS 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 QD 800 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 If there is an external cost of $3, what is the efficient quantity? If there is an external benefit of $3, what is the efficient quantity? For the remaining questions assume that there is a $3 external COST. If the government wants to get the efficient quantity with a per/unit tax, how much should the tax be? Now imagine that they use tradable allowances. If they cap the quantity at 400 what would the value of these allowance be in the market? (Assume the market is perfectly competitive and that "one allowance" lets you…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
