Auditing And Assurance Services
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134897431
Author: ARENS, Alvin A.
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 23DQP
a.
To determine
Explain whether Company H is found liable to the purchasers of common stock.
b.
To determine
Specify whether Bank F is successful in its claims against Company H.
c.
To determine
Specify whether trade creditors are successful in their claim against Company H.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
As an auditor for the CPA firm of Bunge and Dodd, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients.
Desi Corporation is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners’ asking price for the land was $120,000, and the fair market value of the land was $115,000.
Lucille Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 20,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $250,000.The stock was selling at $12 per share.
Instructions:
Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above.
Monicker Co. engaged the audit firm of Gasner & Gasner to audit its financial statements that Monicker was going to use in connection with a public offering of its securities. Monicker's stock regularly trades on the NASDAQ. The audit was completed and the auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, which Monicker submitted to the SEC along with the registration statement. Three hundred thousand shares of Monicker common stock were sold to the public at $13.50 per share. Eight months later, the stock fell to $2 per share when it was disclosed that several large loans to two "paper" companies owned by one of the directors were worthless. The loans were secured by the stock of the borrowing corporation and by Monicker stock owned by the director. These facts were not disclosed in the financial statements. The director and the two corporations are insolvent. Considering these facts, indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false, and briefly…
Monicker Co. engaged the audit firm of Gasner & Gasner to audit its financial statements that Monicker was going to use in connection with a public offering of its securities. Monicker's stock regularly trades on the NASDAQ. The audit was completed and the auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, which Monicker submitted to the SEC along with the registration statement. Three hundred thousand shares of Monicker common stock were sold to the public at $13.50 per share. Eight months later, the stock fell to $2 per share when it was disclosed that several large loans to two "paper" companies owned by one of the directors were worthless. The loans were secured by the stock of the borrowing corporation and by Monicker stock owned by the director. These facts were not disclosed in the financial statements. The director and the two corporations are insolvent. Considering these facts, indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false, and briefly…
Chapter 5 Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 6RQCh. 5 - Prob. 7RQCh. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - Prob. 9RQCh. 5 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 5 - What potential sanctions does the SEC have against...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12RQCh. 5 - Prob. 13RQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 17DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 18DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 19DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 20DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 21DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 22DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 23DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 24DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 27DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 28C
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- As an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. 1. Bramble Corp. is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,000 shares of its $19 par value common stock. The owners’ asking price for the land was $123,500, and the fair value of the land was $117,000. 2. Crane Company is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 21,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $275,000. The stock was selling at $11 per share. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (Record journal entries in the order presented in the problem. Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the…arrow_forwardAs an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. Swifty Corporation is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,800 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners' asking price for the land was $139,200, and the fair value of the land was $127,600. 1. Blue Spruce Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 23,200 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $290,000. The stock was selling at $11 per share. 2. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (List all debit entries before credit entries. Record journal entries in the order presented in the problem. Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.) Dates…arrow_forwardYour answer is partially correct. As an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. 1. Windsor, Inc. is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 3,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners' asking price for the land was $126,000, and the fair value of the land was $115,500. 2. Sheridan Company is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 20,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $268,500. The stock was selling at $11 per share. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter O for the…arrow_forward
- As an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. 1. LR Corporation is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners’ asking price for the land was $120,000, and the fair value of the land was $110,000. 2. Vera Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 20,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $250,000. The stock was selling at $11 per share. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts.)arrow_forwardAs an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. 1. Monty Corp. is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 4,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners’ asking price for the land was $125,000, and the fair value of the land was $118,000. 2. Wildhorse Co. is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 19,000 shares of its $8 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $269,000. The stock was selling at $9 per share. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above.arrow_forwardAs an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. Wildhorse Co. is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 4,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners' asking price for the land was $126,500, and the fair value of the land was $125,000. 1. Pharoah Company is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 19,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $266,500. The stock was selling at $11 per share. 2. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter O for the amounts.) No. Dates Account Titles and…arrow_forward
- Ingram is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) employed by Jordan, Keller and Lane, CPAs, to audit Martin Enterprises, Inc., a fast-growing service firm that went public two years ago. The financial statements Ingram audited were included in a proxy statement proposing a merger with several other firms. The proxy statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and included several inaccuracies. First, approximately $1 million, or more than 20 percent, of the previous year’s “net sales originally reported” had proven nonexistent by the time the proxy statement was filed and had been written off on Martin’s own books. This was not disclosed in the proxy statement, in violation of Accounting Board Opinion Number 9. Second, Martin’s net sales for the current year were stated as $11.3 million when in fact they were less than $10.5 million. Third, Martin’s net profits for the current year were reported as $700,000, when the firm actually had no earnings at all. a. What civil…arrow_forwardMoranda and Sills, LLP, has served for over 10 years as the auditor of the financialstatements of Highland Credit Union. The firm is conducting its audit planning for the currentfiscal year and is in the process of performing risk assessment procedures. Based on inquiries andother information obtained, the auditors learned that the credit union is finalizing an acquisitionof a smaller credit union located in another region of the province. Management anticipatesthat the transaction will close in the third quarter, and, while there will be some challenges inintegrating the IT systems of the acquired credit union with Highland systems, the bank shouldrealize a number of operational cost savings over the long term.During the past year, the credit union has expanded its online service options for customers, who can now remotely deposit funds into and withdraw funds from chequing and savingsaccounts. The system has been well received by customers and the credit union hopes to continue…arrow_forwardWhile auditing the financial statements of Petty Corporation, the certified public accounting firm of Trueblue and Smith discovered that its client’s legal expense account was abnormally high. Further investigation of the records indicated the following: a. Since the beginning of the year, several disbursements totaling $15,000 had been made to the law firm of Swindle, Fox, and Kreip.b. Swindle, Fox, and Kreip were not Petty Corpora- tion’s attorneys.c. A review of the canceled checks showed that they had been written and approved by Mary Boghas, the cash disbursements clerk.d. Boghas’s other duties included performing the endof-month bank reconciliation.e. Subsequent investigation revealed that Swindle, Fox, and Kreip are representing Mary Boghas in an unrelated embezzlement case in which she is the defendant. The checks had been written in payment of her personal legal fees.1. What control procedures could Petty Corporation have employed to prevent this unauthorized use of cash?…arrow_forward
- Dirks was an officer of a New York broker-dealer firm that specialized in providing investment analysis of insurance company securities to institutional investors. On March 6, Dirks received information from Ronald Secrist, a former officer of Equity Funding of America. Secrist alleged that the assets of Equity Funding, a diversified corporation primarily engaged in selling life insurance and mutual funds, were vastly overstated as the result of fraudulent corporate practices. Dirks decided to investigate the allegations. He visited Equity Funding’s headquarters in Los Angeles and interviewed several officers and employees of the corporation. The senior management denied any wrongdoing, but certain corporation employees corroborated the charges of fraud. Neither Dirks nor his firm owned or traded any Equity Funding stock, but throughout his investigation he openly discussed the information he had obtained with a number of clients and investors. Some of these persons sold their holdings…arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…arrow_forwardMark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explainarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning