Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 4, Problem 54CP

Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Total quality management (TQM) is a management approach designed to achieve continuous improvement in the quality of a company's products or services. Fundamental to the TQM approach is the need to create an awareness of quality at all levels of the organization. A researcher in a business school would like to compare the performance of companies that have implemented TQM programs with that of companies that have not. One performance measure is net income over sales (NI/S), an indicator of a company's profitability. The researcher would like to use the Wilcoxon rank sum test to determine whether the change in average NI/S is significantly different between companies with TQM implementation and companies without. Six companies were randomly selected from among those that implemented a TQM program over the same 3-year period, and four were randomly selected from among those that did not. The researcher computed each company's average quarterly NI/S for a 2-year period before the 3-year…

For the following questions (a - 1 ), assume that a population of frogs has an average weight of = 23 grams and a standard deviation (° ) equal to 1 gram. You obtain a sample of N = 15 frogs, where the average weight in grams (X) equals 23.4 grams and s = 0.95. You wish to conduct a hypothesis test specifying Ho : 10 = 23 grams. (a) Report the T-Score test statistic (T). Round your answer to three decimal places. (b) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you have sufficient evidence to reject Ho when a = 0.05 ? (c) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you make a Type I or Type Il error when a = 0.05 ? (d) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you have sufficient evidence to reject Ho when a = 0.01 ? (e) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you make a Type I or Type II error when a = 0.01 ? You obtain a sample of N = 15 frogs, where the average weight in grams (X) equals 23.4 grams and s = 0.95. You wish to conduct a hypothesis test…

For the following questions (a - j), assume that a population of frogs has an average weight of μ 23 grams and a standard deviation (σ) equal to 1 gram. = You obtain a sample of N = 15 frogs, where the average weight in grams (X) equals 23.4 grams and s = 0.95. You wish to conduct a hypothesis test specifying Ho: μo = 23 grams. (a) Report the T-Score test statistic (T). Round your answer to three decimal places. (b) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you have sufficient evidence to reject Ho when α = 0.05? (c) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you make a Type I or Type II er- ror when α = 0.05? (d) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you have sufficient evidence to reject Ho when a = 0.01? (e) Based on the T-Score test statistic (T) in (a), do you make a Type I or Type II er- ror when a = 0.01? You obtain a sample of N = 15 frogs, where the average weight in grams (X) equals 23.4 grams and s = 0.95. You wish to conduct a hypothesis test…

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 4, Problem 54CP

Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 4, Problem 54CP

Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 4, Problem 54CP

Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

To determine

Explain why an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment for conducting a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

The given information is that, a study is to be conducted to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely.

Observational study:

When the subjects in a study are just observed for the values of the response variable without imposing any treatments, it is termed as observational study.

Experimental study:

When the subjects in a study are assigned to different experimental conditions for observing the outcome of the response variable, it is termed as experimental study. The experimental conditions that are assigned to the subjects are termed as treatments.

Justification: The researcher is interested to test whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely. The researcher cannot assign the subjects to the condition of using cell phone which causes brain cancer because it is unethical.

If the researcher can collect the random sample by just observing who are suffering from brain cancer and their cell phone usage, which would be more appropriate. Hence an observational study would be more realistic than an experiment

Answer 13

Ch. 4.1 - Cell phones Consider the cell phone Study 3...Ch. 4.1 - High blood pressure and binge drinking Many...Ch. 4.1 - Low-fat versus low-carb diet? One hundred...Ch. 4.1 - Experiments versus observational studies When...Ch. 4.1 - School testing for drugs Example 3 discussed a...Ch. 4.1 - Hormone therapy and heart disease Since 1976 the...Ch. 4.1 - Speaking foreign languages A 2014 study...Ch. 4.1 - Breast-cancer screening A study published in 2010...Ch. 4.1 - Experiment or observe? Explain whether an...Ch. 4.1 - Baseball under a full moon During a baseball game...

Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Concept explainers

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 4 Solutions