Concept explainers
i.
Cash Flow equation including B variable.
Answer to Problem 45P
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Cash- flow moment-equation.
Concept used:
Cash-flow movement equation shows equilibrium from a given pivot point.
Positive force is calculated from right side from pivot point. It is calculated by adding number of years at any pivot point.
Negative forces are discounted when calculation is done from left-side of pivot point.
In this case, year 4 has been taken as pivot point. The distance from point 4 is 0, distance from 2 is 1 and the distance from point 1 is 2. These are the points situated at right side of the pivot points. Hence, the value will be positive. These values will be compounded.
Since there exist no points at left side of the pivot points. Thus, the value will not be negative as a result there will be no discounted value.
Upside values will be added and downside values will be deducted.
Calculation:
With year 3 as the pivot point, the cash flow moment equation will be as follows
Conclusion:
Therefore, above equations will provide the equilibrium of the cash-flows at the given points.
ii.
Cash Flow equation including variable C.
Answer to Problem 45P
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Cash- flow moment-equation.
Concept used:
Cash-flow movement equation shows equilibrium from a given pivot point.
Positive force is calculated from right side from pivot point. It is calculated by adding number of years at any pivot point.
Negative forces are discounted when calculation is done from left-side of pivot point.
Calculation:
In this case, year 5 has been taken as pivot point. The distance from point is 2, distance from point 2 is 3 and distance from point 1 is 4. These are the points situated at the right side of the pivot point with upside direction Hence, the value will be positive These values will be compounded.
The distance from point 5 is -1. These are the points situated at left-side of the pivot point with downside direction. Hence, the value will be negative. These values will be discounted.
Conclusion:
Therefore, above equations will provide the equilibrium of the cash-flows at the given points.
iii.
Cash Flow equation including variable V.
Answer to Problem 45P
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Cash- flow moment-equation.
Concept used:
Cash-flow movement equation shows equilibrium from a given pivot point.
Positive force is calculated from right side from pivot point. It is calculated by adding number of years at any pivot point.
Negative forces are discounted when calculation is done from left-side of pivot point.
In this case, Year 5 has been taken as pivot point. The distance from point 3 is 2, distance from point 2 is 3 and the distance from point 1 is 4. These are the points situated at right side of the pivot point with upside direction. Hence, the value will be positive. These values will be compounded. Since there exist no points at left side of the pivot point. Thus, the value will not be negative as a result there will be no discounted value.
Calculation:
With Year 4 as the pivot point, the cash flow moment equation will be as follows:
Conclusion:
Therefore, above equations will provide the equilibrium of the cash-flows at the given points.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
- It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardanswerarrow_forward
- Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forwardFor the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forward
- presentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward"Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forward
- compare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forwardSuppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education