Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781337619455
Author: Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 20RQSC
(a)
To determine
Introduction: Auditor is appointed by the company in order to get their financial statements checked whether they are authentic or reliable for further usage by the shareholders and other users.
The merits of the actions that can be taken by the common stock purchaser and by the bank.
(b)
To determine
Introduction: Auditor is appointed by the company in order to get their financial statements checked whether they are authentic or reliable for further usage by the shareholders and other users.
The different if the client file the case using registered statement company under 1933 act.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
In order to expand its operations, Barton Corp. raised $5million in a public offering of common stock, and also negotiated a $2 million loanfrom First National Bank. In connection with this financing, Barton engaged Hanover &Co., CPAs, to audit Barton’s financial statements. Hanover knew that the sole purpose ofthe audit was so that Barton would have audited financial statements to provide to FirstNational Bank and the purchasers of the common stock. Although Hanover conductedthe audit in conformity with its audit program, Hanover failed to detect material actsof embezzlement committed by Barton Corp.’s president. Hanover did not detect theembezzlement because of its inadvertent failure to exercise due care in designing theaudit program for this engagement.After completing the engagement, Hanover issued an unqualified opinion on Barton’sfinancial statements. The financial statements were relied upon by the purchasers ofthe common stock in deciding to purchase the shares. In…
Dirks was an officer of a New York broker-dealer firm that specialized in providing investment analysis of insurance company securities to institutional investors. On March 6, Dirks received information from Ronald Secrist, a former officer of Equity Funding of America. Secrist alleged that the assets of Equity Funding, a diversified corporation primarily engaged in selling life insurance and mutual funds, were vastly overstated as the result of fraudulent corporate practices. Dirks decided to investigate the allegations. He visited Equity Funding’s headquarters in Los Angeles and interviewed several officers and employees of the corporation. The senior management denied any wrongdoing, but certain corporation employees corroborated the charges of fraud. Neither Dirks nor his firm owned or traded any Equity Funding stock, but throughout his investigation he openly discussed the information he had obtained with a number of clients and investors. Some of these persons sold their holdings…
Monicker Co. engaged the audit firm of Gasner & Gasner to audit its financial statements that Monicker was going to use in connection with a public offering of its securities. Monicker's stock regularly trades on the NASDAQ. The audit was completed and the auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, which Monicker submitted to the SEC along with the registration statement. Three hundred thousand shares of Monicker common stock were sold to the public at $13.50 per share. Eight months later, the stock fell to $2 per share when it was disclosed that several large loans to two "paper" companies owned by one of the directors were worthless. The loans were secured by the stock of the borrowing corporation and by Monicker stock owned by the director. These facts were not disclosed in the financial statements. The director and the two corporations are insolvent. Considering these facts, indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false, and briefly…
Chapter 4 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 2CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 3CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 4CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 5CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 6CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 7CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 8CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 9CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 10CYBK
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 12CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 1RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 2RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 3RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 4RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 5RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 6RQSCCh. 4 - Refer to the Focus on Fraud feature “Moss Adams...Ch. 4 - Prob. 8RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 9RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 10RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 11RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 12RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 13RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 14RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 15RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 16RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 17RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 18RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 19RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 20RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 21RQSCCh. 4 - Able Corporation decided to make a public offering...Ch. 4 - KPMG (LO 1, 2, 3) KPMG LLP served as the external...Ch. 4 - ToshIba, EY (LO 1, 2, 3) In 2015, the business...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In 1983, to obtain financing prior to a public offering, Osborne Corporation sold warrants entitling investors to buy Osborne shares at a favorable price. The investors were given and relied on an unqualified audit opinion regarding Osborne’s 1982 financial statements, which indicated that Osborne had a net operating profit of $69,000 on sales of $68 million. The audit opinion, issued by Arthur Young & Company, stated that the audit had been completed in compliance with GAAS, that the financial statements had been prepared in compliance with FGAPP, and that the financial statements fairly presented Osborne’s financial position. Arthur Young could foresee that the audited financial statements might be used by buyers of Osborne’s warrants, but Arthur Young did not know that buyers of warrants would in fact use the financial statements. The buyers of the warrants lost their investments when Osborne’s manufacturing problems and IBM’s dominance in the PC market forced Osborne into…arrow_forwardMonicker Co. engaged the audit firm of Gasner & Gasner to audit its financial statements that Monicker was going to use in connection with a public offering of its securities. Monicker's stock regularly trades on the NASDAQ. The audit was completed and the auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, which Monicker submitted to the SEC along with the registration statement. Three hundred thousand shares of Monicker common stock were sold to the public at $13.50 per share. Eight months later, the stock fell to $2 per share when it was disclosed that several large loans to two "paper" companies owned by one of the directors were worthless. The loans were secured by the stock of the borrowing corporation and by Monicker stock owned by the director. These facts were not disclosed in the financial statements. The director and the two corporations are insolvent. Considering these facts, indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false, and briefly…arrow_forwardAs an auditor for the CPA firm of Bunge and Dodd, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. Desi Corporation is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners’ asking price for the land was $120,000, and the fair market value of the land was $115,000. Lucille Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 20,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $250,000.The stock was selling at $12 per share. Instructions: Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above.arrow_forward
- Able Corporation decided to make a public offering of bonds to raise needed capital. On June 30, 2022, it publicly sold $2.5 million of 12% debentures in accordance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.The financial statements filed with the registration statement contained the unqualified opinion of Baker & Co., CPAs. The statements overstated Able’s net income and net worth. Through negligence Baker did not detect the overstatements. As a result, the bonds, which originally sold for $1,000 per bond, have dropped in value to $700.Ira is an investor who purchased $10,000 of the bonds. He promptly brought an action against Baker under the Securities Act of 1933. If Will prevails on his claim under the Securities Act of 1933, what are the reasons he does?arrow_forwardCassandra Corporation, a manufacturing company, periodically invests large sums in marketable equity securities. The investment committee of the board of directors established the investment policy. The treasurer is responsible for carrying out the investment committee's directives. All securities are stored in a bank safe deposit vault. Your internal control questionnaire with respect to Cassandra's investment in equity securities contains the following three questions: Is the investment policy established by the investment committee of the board of directors? Is the treasurer solely responsible for carrying out the investment committee's directive? Are all securities stored in a bank safe deposit vault? In addition to these three questions, what questions should your internal control questionnaire include with respect to the company's investment in marketable equity securities? (Hint: Prepare questions to cover management's transaction assertions of occurrence, completeness, cutoff,…arrow_forwardKPMG LLP served as the external auditor for some of the largest subprimemortgage lenders in the U.S. leading up to and during the housingmarket crisis of the mid to late-2000s. The audits of two of theirlargest lending clients, New Century Financial Corporation and Countrywide,ultimately led the firm to settle litigation charges in 2010 for$44.7 and $24 million, respectively. The business model of these twosubprime mortgage lenders consisted of providing loans to borrowerswith weak credit histories. The business model had begun to fail during2007, when the economy weakened, borrowers began defaulting, andhome prices declined drastically. New Century filed for bankruptcy andCountrywide was purchased by Bank of America, which subsequentlysuffered massive losses related to business failures at Countrywide.Just before the housing crash of 2007 put the companies in severefinancial crises, KPMG had given both companies unqualified auditopinions.In both cases, KPMG was subsequently accused of…arrow_forward
- Dryden, a certified public accountant, audited the books of Elixir, Inc., and certified incorrect financial statements in a form that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Shortly thereafter, Elixer, Inc., went bankrupt. Investigation into the bankruptcy disclosed that through an intricate and clever embezzlement scheme Kraft, the president of Elixir, had siphoned off substantial sums of money that now support Kraft in a luxurious lifestyle in South America. Investors who purchased shares of Elixir have brought suit against Dryden under Rule 10b-5. At trial, Dryden produces evidence demonstrating that his failure to discover the embezzlement resulted merely from negligence on his part and that he had no knowledge of the fraudulent conduct. Is Dryden liable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934? Why?arrow_forwardJane Ellerby and Sam Callison are discussing the recent fraud that occurred at LowRental Leasing, Inc. The fraud involved the improper reporting of revenue to ensure that the company would have income in excess of $1 million. What is fraudulent financial reporting, and how does it differ from an embezzlement of company funds?arrow_forwardYour answer is partially correct. As an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. 1. Windsor, Inc. is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 3,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners' asking price for the land was $126,000, and the fair value of the land was $115,500. 2. Sheridan Company is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 20,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $268,500. The stock was selling at $11 per share. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter O for the…arrow_forward
- As an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. 1. LR Corporation is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,000 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners’ asking price for the land was $120,000, and the fair value of the land was $110,000. 2. Vera Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 20,000 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $250,000. The stock was selling at $11 per share. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts.)arrow_forwardAs an auditor for the CPA firm of Hinkson and Calvert, you encounter the following situations in auditing different clients. Swifty Corporation is a closely held corporation whose stock is not publicly traded. On December 5, the corporation acquired land by issuing 5,800 shares of its $20 par value common stock. The owners' asking price for the land was $139,200, and the fair value of the land was $127,600. 1. Blue Spruce Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose common stock is traded on the securities markets. On June 1, it acquired land by issuing 23,200 shares of its $10 par value stock. At the time of the exchange, the land was advertised for sale at $290,000. The stock was selling at $11 per share. 2. Prepare the journal entries for each of the situations above. (List all debit entries before credit entries. Record journal entries in the order presented in the problem. Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.) Dates…arrow_forwardMajor, Major & Sharpe, CPAs, are the auditors of MacLain Technologies. In connectionwith the public offering of $10 million of MacLain securities, Major expressed anunqualified opinion as to the financial statements. Subsequent to the offering, certainmisstatements were revealed. Major has been sued by the purchasers of the stockoffered pursuant to the registration statement that included the financial statementsaudited by Major. In the ensuing lawsuit by the MacLain investors, Major will be ableto avoid liability if(1) the misstatements were caused primarily by MacLain.(2) it can be shown that at least some of the investors did not actually read theaudited financial statements.(3) it can prove due diligence in the audit of the financial statements of MacLain.(4) MacLain had expressly assumed any liability in connection with the public offering.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage