Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781337619455
Author: Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 4, Problem 16RQSC
To determine
Introduction: Unqualified opining of an auditor means that the auditor has concluded that the financial statements of the company’s operations are fairly presented along with compliance of GAAP.
: The concept under which creditor, who gave loan to the auditor’s client, may recover the losses from the auditor.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
When creditors who relied on an entity’s audited financial statements suffer monetary lossesafter a customer (the auditors’ client) goes bankrupt, what must the plaintiff creditors in alawsuit for damages show in a court that follows the doctrine in Credit Alliance?a. The auditors knew and specifically acknowledged identification of the creditors.b. The auditors could reasonably foresee them as beneficiaries of the audit because entitiessuch as this client use financial statements to obtain credit from vendors.c. The plaintiffs were foreseen users of the audited financial statements because they werevendors of long standing.d. All of the above
An auditor knew that the purpose of her audit was to render reasonable assurance on financial statements that were to be used for the application for a loan; the auditor did not know the identity of the bank that would eventually give the loan. Under the Restatement of Torts approach to liability, the auditor is generally liable to the bank which subsequently grants the loan for:
Audit independence in fact is most clearly lost whena. A public accounting firm audits competitor companies in the same industry (e.g., Coca-Colaand Pepsi).b. An auditor agrees to the argument made by the client’s financial vice president that deferringlosses on debt refinancing is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.c. An audit team fails to discover the client’s misleading omission of disclosure about permanent impairment of asset values.d. A public accounting firm issues a standard unmodified report, but the reviewing partnerfails to notice that the assistant’s observation of inventory was woefully incomplete.
Chapter 4 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 4 - Prob. 1CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 2CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 3CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 4CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 5CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 6CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 7CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 8CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 9CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 10CYBK
Ch. 4 - Prob. 11CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 12CYBKCh. 4 - Prob. 1RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 2RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 3RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 4RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 5RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 6RQSCCh. 4 - Refer to the Focus on Fraud feature “Moss Adams...Ch. 4 - Prob. 8RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 9RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 10RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 11RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 12RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 13RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 14RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 15RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 16RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 17RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 18RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 19RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 20RQSCCh. 4 - Prob. 21RQSCCh. 4 - Able Corporation decided to make a public offering...Ch. 4 - KPMG (LO 1, 2, 3) KPMG LLP served as the external...Ch. 4 - ToshIba, EY (LO 1, 2, 3) In 2015, the business...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Which of the following statements is invalid relating to confirmation of accounts receivable? a. A negative form of confirmation is preferable to use when individual account balances of customers are relatively smallb. A positive confirmation provides more reliable evidence than the negative confirmation because the auditor can perform follow-up procedures if no response is received from the debtorc. An auditor must consider using the negative form of confirmation when there is reason to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in dispute or with inaccuracies or irregularitiesd. In negative confirmation, failure to reply must be regarded as a correct response, even though the debtor may have ignored the confirmation requeste. None of the abovearrow_forwardUnder common law, which of the following statements most accurately reflects the liability of a CPA who fraudulently gives an opinion on an audit of a client's financial statements? A. The CPA is liable only to third parties in privity of contract with the CPA B. The CPA is liable only to known users of the financial statements C. The CPA probably is liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud D. The CPA probably is liable to the client even if the client was aware of the fraud and did not rely on the opinionarrow_forwardWhich of the following are financial statement frauds? Select which three options are correct. A. Intentional misapplication of accounting principles related to amounts. B. Forging of accounting records C. Intentional misapplication of accounting principles related to disclosure. D. Unintentional omission from the financial statements of transactionsarrow_forward
- Kay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements. After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and accounts receivable were overstated. The client subsequently went bankrupt and defaulted on the loan. The bank alleged that the auditor failed to communicate about the inadequacy of the client’s internal recordkeeping and inventory control. Moreover, the bank claims that the auditors were grossly negligent in not discovering the overvaluation of inventory and accounts receivable. The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms…arrow_forwardChoose the one correct answer. Which of the following statements is invalid relating to confirmation of accounts receivable? a. A negative form of confirmation is preferable to use when individual account balances of customers are relatively smallb. A positive confirmation provides more reliable evidence than the negative confirmation because the auditor can perform follow-up procedures if no response is received from the debtorc. An auditor must consider using the negative form of confirmation when there is reason to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in dispute or with inaccuracies or irregularitiesd. In negative confirmation, failure to reply must be regarded as a correct response, even though the debtor may have ignored the confirmation requeste. None of the abovearrow_forwardKay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements. After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and accounts receivable were overstated. The client subsequently went bankrupt and defaulted on the loan. The bank alleged that the auditor failed to communicate about the inadequacy of the client’s internal recordkeeping and inventory control. Moreover, the bank claims that the auditors were grossly negligent in not discovering the overvaluation of inventory and accounts receivable. The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms…arrow_forward
- Kay & Lee LLP was retained as the auditor for Holligan Industries to audit the financial statements required by prospective banks as a prerequisite to extending a loan to the client. The auditor knows whichever bank lends money to the client is likely to rely on the audited statements. After the audit report is issued, the bank that ultimately made the loan discovers that the audit client’s inventory and accounts receivable were overstated. The client subsequently went bankrupt and defaulted on the loan. The bank alleged that the auditor failed to communicate about the inadequacy of the client’s internal recordkeeping and inventory control. Moreover, the bank claims that the auditors were grossly negligent in not discovering the overvaluation of inventory and accounts receivable. The auditors asserted that there was no way for them to know that the client included in the inventory account $1 million of merchandise in transit to a customer on December 31, 2015. The shipping terms…arrow_forwardChoose the one correct answer Which of the following statements is valid relating to confirmation of accounts receivable? * a. A positive confirmation provides more reliable evidence than the negative confirmation because the auditor can perform follow-up procedures if no response is received from the debtorB. A negative form of confirmation is preferable to use when individual account balances of customers are relatively largec. In positive confirmation, failure to reply must be regarded as a correct response, even though the debtor may have ignored the confirmation requestd. An auditor must consider using the negative form of confirmation when there is reason to believe that there may be a substantial number of accounts in dispute or with inaccuracies or irregularitiese. None of the abovearrow_forward1) Using the categories included in the professional standards, embezzlement is an example of: a)other illegal acts. b)misappropriation of assets. c)fraudulent financial reporting. d)an error. 2) Using the categories included in the professional standards, inappropriately and intentionally failing to expense expired amounts of the prepaid insurance is an example of a)misappropriation of assets. b)other illegal acts. c)fraudulent financial reporting. d)direct effect illegal act 3)A financial statement audit should be designed to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement due to: a)misappropriation of assets only. b)fraudulent financial reporting only.c)neither fraudulent financial reporting nor misappropriation of assets. d)both fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets 4)A financial statement audit should be designed to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material…arrow_forward
- 1) Using the categories included in the professional standards, inappropriately and intentionally failing to expense expired amounts of the prepaid insurance is an example of a)misappropriation of assets. b)other illegal acts. c)fraudulent financial reporting. d)direct effect illegal act 2)A financial statement audit should be designed to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement due to: a)misappropriation of assets only. b)fraudulent financial reporting only.c)neither fraudulent financial reporting nor misappropriation of assets. d)both fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assetsarrow_forwardIndividuals who believe they relied on misstated financial statements to make a decision andhave suffered losses as a result will issue an action known as aa. Breach of contract.b. Tort.c. Securities litigation.d. Constructive fraud.arrow_forwardWhich action is not considered an act discreditable to the accounting profession? a) Being finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated any of the federal antidiscrimination laws. b) Having a bank collect notes received from a client in payment of fees. c) Failing to follow standards and procedures established by governmental agencies in audits of grants by those agencies. d) Negligently permitting another to sign a document containing materially false and misleading information.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub