a.
Determine if the given situation amounts to tax avoidance or tax evasion.
a.
Explanation of Solution
Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion: Tax avoidance refers to legalized means of reducing the tax liabilities by the taxpayers through tax planning, on the other hand, illegal means to avoid tax is known as tax evasion which is considered as offence and punishable under law.
In this case, since Mr. L is engaged in concealing his real income and understating it deliberately to avoid tax liability, this would be considered as tax evasion.
b.
Determine if the given situation amounts to tax avoidance or tax evasion.
b.
Explanation of Solution
In this case, since Mr. P did not conceal any of his income rather encourages his son who is with lesser marginal tax rate than him, to invest $50,000, Mr. P is said to be engaged in tax avoidance.
c.
Determine if the given situation amounts to tax avoidance or tax evasion.
c.
Explanation of Solution
In this case, since Mr. Q did not reveal truth in reporting his current years’ profit in the previous year just to gain by the lower marginal tax, he is deliberately trying to cheat the authorities by wrong reporting of income and thus, would be considered as tax evasion.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 4 Solutions
Principles Of Taxation For Business And Investment Planning 2020 Edition
- In each of the following problems, identify the tax issue(s) posed by the facts presented. Determine the possible tax consequences of each issue that you identify. Thans grandmother dies and leaves him jewelry worth 40,000. In addition, he is the beneficiary of a 100,000 life insurance policy that his grandmother had bought before she retired.arrow_forwardSheila, a single taxpayer, is a retired computer executive with a taxable income of 100,000 in the current year. She receives 30,000 per year in tax-exempt municipal bond interest. Adam and Tanya are married and have no children. Adam and Tanyas 100,000 taxable income is comprised solely of wages they earn from their jobs. Calculate and compare the amount of tax Sheila pays with Adam and Tanyas tax. How well does the ability-to-pay concept work in this situation?arrow_forwardDetermine whether the taxpayer has income that is subject to taxation in each of the following situations: a. Capital Motor Company is going out of business. As a result, June is able to purchase a car for 12,000; its original sticker price was 25,000. b. Chuck is the sole owner of Ransom, Inc., a corporation. He purchases a machine from Ransom for 10,000. Ransom had paid 50,000 for the machine, which was worth 30,000 at the time of the sale to Chuck. c. Gerry is an elementary school teacher. She receives the Teacher of the Month Award for February. As part of the award, she gets to drive a new car supplied by a local dealer for a month. The rental value of the car is 400 per month. d. Payne has worked for Stewart Company for the last 25 years. On the 25th anniversary of his employment with Stewart, he receives a set of golf clubs worth 1,200 as a reward for his years of loyal service to the company. e. Anna enters a sweepstakes contest that was advertised on the back of a cereal box, and wins 30,000. The prize will be paid out in 30 annual installments of 1,000. She receives her first check this year. f. Terry buys an antique vase at an estate auction for 780. Upon returning home, she accidentally drops the vase and finds that a 100 bill had been taped inside it.arrow_forward
- In each of the following problems, identify the tax issue(s) posed by the facts presented. Determine the possible tax consequences of each issue that you identify. Binh met Anika 10 years ago at a cocktail party. Anika was a wealthy investor with extensive holdings in the oil and gas industry. Binh was a real estate agent earning about 35,000 a year. Several months later, Binh proposed marriage and Anika accepted. Just before the wedding, Anika told Binh that she had a mental hangup about marriage, and Binh agreed to live with her without being married. In return, Anika promised to leave Binh her entire estate. In the ensuing years, they had an intimate, marriage-like relationship, attending social, business, and family functions together. Anika died in 2015. No will was found immediately. A few months after Anikas death, her sister found a one-page paper signed by Anika. The paper left Anikas entire estate to her brothers and sisters and named her sister as executor of the estate. Binh sued Anikas estate and won a judgment of 2 million for services rendered to Anika during their relationship. The estate appealed the decision, which was affirmed as to liability but reversed and remanded for a new trial on the amount of the judgment. Binh and the estate subsequently worked out an agreement in which the estate paid Binh 1.2 million to settle his claim.arrow_forwardLast year Aleshia identified 15,000 as a nonbusiness bad debt. In that tax year, before considering the tax implications of the nonbusiness bad debt, Aleshia had 100,000 of taxable income, of which 12,000 consisted of short-term capital gains. This year Aleshia collected 8,000 of the amount she had previously identified as a bad debt. Determine Aleshias tax treatment of the 8,000 received in the current tax year.arrow_forward
- Individual Income TaxesAccountingISBN:9780357109731Author:HoffmanPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT