Case summary:
Company A sells traveller’s cheques (TC) to customers upon contract that company A has the right to use or invest funds from selling TC s until the customers redeem the cheques. Funds from selling traveller’s cheques comes under unclaimed property according to the laws and therefore, the company A sends the funds to government treasury with the TC details and when a particular cheque is cashed, company A reclaims the funds from treasury with interest. Recently, government of state N passed an amendment into the laws governing unclaimed property reducing the abandonment period of cheques from 15 years to 3 years. Company A challenged the constitutionality of the amendment.
To discuss: If the amendment violates the Due Process Clause, Contract Clause, Takings clause and, Commerce Clause.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 4 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
- On a beautiful Saturday in October, Francie decides to take the twenty-mile ride from her home in New Jersey into New York City to do some shopping. Francie finds that Brown’s Retail Sales, Inc., has a terrific sale on televisions and decides to surprise her husband with a new high-definition television. She purchases the set from Brown’s on her VISA card for $1,450. When the set is delivered, Francie discovers that it does not work. Brown’s refuses to repair or replace it or to credit Francie’s account. Francie therefore refuses to pay VISA for the television. VISA brings a suit against Francie. Will VISA prevail? Why or why not?arrow_forwardA contractor has agreed to build a home for Jane for $300,000. Early in the construction of the home, Jane is informed by the bank that she can only have a $280,000 loan. Jane speaks to the contractor, asking if he would drop his price by $20,000. As it happens, she called the contractor while he was watching his daughter on stage accepting an award for her dance performance. He took Jane's call and being so emotionally overwhelmed at the time by his daughter's success, that he told Jane sure, no problem. However, when it came time for final payment, he told Jane he changed his mind and needs full payment. Jane comes to see you, her lawyer, and asks for your advice. What do you tell her?arrow_forwardJoshua acquired bulk onions as an agent for Sheriffe but couldn’t ship them due of a storm and damaged port infrastructure. Joshua was unable to contact Joshua owing to an interruption in the telecommunications infrastructure, so he sold the onion to a grocery chain and abandoned the rest, which started to rot. Sheriffe has sustained a big loss and is considering suing Joshua to recoup part of it. Advise Sheriffe on the possibilities of recovering lost revenue in this situation.arrow_forward
- Danny is furious when he discovers that his car has been repossessed by Sakan Finance in his absence, eventhough he did receive a repossession notice in his mailbox. Discuss whether Sakan Finance is entitled to act in such a manner. I need Only typing answerarrow_forwardWhite, an employee of ABC Corporation, intentionally issued two payments for the same invoice.After the disbursements had been mailed, White called the vendor and explained that a doublepayment had been made by mistake. She asked the vendor to return one of the checks to herattention. When the vendor returned the check, White took it and cashed it. This is an example of: a. A pass-through scheme b. A pay and return scheme c. A shell company scheme d. A receivables skimming schemearrow_forwardIn the event that a buyer receives a shipment of seriously defective goods, under the CISG, the buyer must notify the seller of the defects within a reasonable time. True or False. Explain.arrow_forward
- delivering cash or another financial asset. However, Entity A's - Entity A issues an instrument that is re-purchasable by delivering cash or another financial asset. However, Entity A's contractual obligation to repurchase the instrument is conditional on the holder (the counterparty) exercising its right to redeem. Which of the following statements is correct from the perspective of Entity A? The instrument is a financial liability because when the holder exercises its redemption right, Entity A does not have the unconditional right to avoid making the а. payment. b. The instrument is an equity instrument because Entity A's contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset is conditional on the holder exercising its right to payment. c. Entity A initially classifies the instrument as an equity с. instrument. However, when the holder exercises its redemption right, the instrument is reclassified to financial liability. d. The instrument is classified as a financial…arrow_forwardBMW bought billboard advertising at the Jays' games for $80,000. It is estimated that they sold an additional 50 cars during the campaign. The contribution margin they made on each car during this promotional campaign was $2,000. What is the ROMI for the billboard advertising?arrow_forwardPen Company and ABC Accounting firm enter into a contract for the purchase of 500 pens. The contract fails to state the price of the pens. This contract is still enforceable under Article 2 of the UCC. True Falsearrow_forward
- Jill is an American making dresses in Alabama whose business is based on U.S. dollars. Jill has agreed to accept 1,000 Euros for the dresses she sold to a customer in Europe, with payment due in one month. True or false, Jill's profit on this transaction would be less than she anticipated at the time of the agreement, if changes in the conversion rate for Euros into U.S. dollars after the date of the agreement meant that Euros were worth less in U.S. dollars on the day that the customer actually paid her the 1,000 Euros. True or False?arrow_forwardBailee had a balance of $422.88 in a check register. The bank notified Bailee that Nicholas had insufficient funds to cover his check that Bailee deposited. The bank indicated that Bailee's bank balance was being reduced. Bailee felt that this was unfair since she never "bounces" her own checks. Is she justified? Please explain.arrow_forwardOn March 3rd 2009, the Fraud Examination Team, a department of the Bureau of Fraud Examination, received a call from Anton Valukas, chairman of the Chicago law firm Jenner & Block LLP. In early 2009, a bankruptcy court in New York assigned Valukas to investigate and report on the causes of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LBHI)[1]’s 2008 bankruptcy. During this investigation, Valukas came across “Repo 105” and “Repo 108” transactions that Lehman used from 2001 to 2008. A “repo” or repurchase agreement is a form of short-term borrowing, whereby one party agrees to temporarily “sell” securities to another party at a specified price, while also committing to repurchase them at a future date, and at a usually higher preset price by the same buyer. While “repo” transactions are legal and are frequently used by investment banks as a means of obtaining short-term financing, Valukas stated that given the period of the fiscal year when these transactions were mostly conducted, as well as how…arrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON