Differences among jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction and the three types of jurisdiction over the parties.

Question

2. Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc., 2009 SCC 6 (CanLII) Shafron sold his insurance agency to KRG and was subsequently employed by its successor, KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc. Each employment contract contained a restrictive covenant whereby Shafron agreed that for three years after leaving his employment, he would not work for an insurance brokerage within the "Metropolitan City of Vancouver." When he left the respondent company and began working as an insurance salesman for another agency in Richmond, BC, KRG Western commenced an action to enforce the restrictive covenant. The trial judge dismissed the action, finding that the term "Metropolitan City of Vancouver" in the restrictive covenant was neither clear, certain, nor reasonable. The trial decision was reversed on appeal. The appeal court agreed that the term "Metropolitan City of Vancouver" was ambiguous; however, it severed that term and held that the term means the "City of Vancouver, the University of…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 3CO

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Differences among jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction and the three types of jurisdiction over the parties.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

2. Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc., 2009 SCC 6 (CanLII) Shafron sold his insurance agency to KRG and was subsequently employed by its successor, KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc. Each employment contract contained a restrictive covenant whereby Shafron agreed that for three years after leaving his employment, he would not work for an insurance brokerage within the "Metropolitan City of Vancouver." When he left the respondent company and began working as an insurance salesman for another agency in Richmond, BC, KRG Western commenced an action to enforce the restrictive covenant. The trial judge dismissed the action, finding that the term "Metropolitan City of Vancouver" in the restrictive covenant was neither clear, certain, nor reasonable. The trial decision was reversed on appeal. The appeal court agreed that the term "Metropolitan City of Vancouver" was ambiguous; however, it severed that term and held that the term means the "City of Vancouver, the University of…

What is the liability of the managers or owners of the establishment for the negligent act of their employees. What is an obligation under article 1156 of the civil code.

Describe the constitutional foundations of administrative law, including the separation of powers, the non-delegation doctrine, and the due process rights of individuals affected by administrative actions.