Given situation: Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law. Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding. To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

A chemical processing company stored toxic waste on its premises. A severe storm caused damaged to the containers storing the waste, which resulted in the spill contaminating nearby pond, which belongs to Sam. The chemical processing company was careful when storing the waste and no allegation of negligence is made. However, Sam claims that the chemical processing company is liable for the pond contamination, even though there is no negligence. Is Sam correct? Explain

Atlantic Cement operated a large cement plant. Neighboring landowners sued for damages and an injunction, claiming that their properties were injured by the dirt, smoke, and vibrations coming from the plant. The lower court found that the plant constituted a nuisance and granted temporary damages but refused to grant an injunction because the benefits of operating the plant outweighed the harm to the plaintiffs’ properties. The landowners appealed. Does the plant constitute a nuisance? Should it be shut down?

Reaction to discussion below: Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building where alarm systems were maintained by the ADT company. When the systems were defective and allowed water into the building, it damaged Melodee’s property; Then Melodee decided to sue ADT and their defense was that the service contract limited the liability to 10% of the annual service charge given to the customers. The limitation can be valid since the ADT company did not provide much liability protection. The ADT company can offer another protection plan to Melodee, which would cover her property but at a higher price rate. This case limitation of liability clauses will be enacted since ADT company was not fully liable for Melodee's property, which only would cover the limited 10%. A limitation of liability clauses contract states that one of the parties is not fully liable for damages in case of a breach. The ADT company is at fault for the malfunctions in their systems they should offer a higher…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Answer 6

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

Answer 7

Chapter 3, Problem 1Q

a)

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Person G quit his job and vended his property for loss based on the decision of a newspaper columnist that State X will be flooded on Sept 1. As on the date, flooding didn’t came so he sued against the columnist in State X court for damages. Later on court dismissed the case on the grounds that a failure to state a cause of action under applicable State law.

Later he appeal, State X Supreme Court supported the lower court of law. After three months, lower court has ruled that a reader could sue a columnist for incorrectly predicting flooding.

To discuss: Whether State Y supreme court following the ruling of State X court as on the matter of stare decisis.

Answer 8

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

Answer 9

b)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

Answer 10

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

Answer 11

c)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

Answer 12

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Answer 13

d)

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Answer 14

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 15

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 16

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 17

Ch. 3 - Prob. 1CO Ch. 3 - Prob. 2CO Ch. 3 - Prob. 3CO Ch. 3 - Prob. 4CO Ch. 3 - Prob. 5CO Ch. 3 - Prob. 1Q Ch. 3 - Prob. 2Q Ch. 3 - Prob. 3Q Ch. 3 - Prob. 4Q Ch. 3 - Prob. 5Q

To discuss: Whether State Y Supreme court have followed the ruling of state X until State Y Supreme court issued ruling.

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme court overrules the ruling issued by State X Supreme court.

To discuss: Whether Country U Supreme Court will resolve the conflicts between State X Supreme Court and State Y Supreme Courts when they rule exactly in opposite way.

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 3 Solutions