Advanced Accounting
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305084858
Author: Paul M. Fischer, William J. Tayler, Rita H. Cheng
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 3B.1.3AE
To determine
Elimination and
Requirement of making such kind of entries is to eliminate the subsidiary share in the books of holding and also to record the transaction in the books of accounts.
To calculate:
Prepare consolidated worksheet for elimination and adjustments for the year end December
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Cirrata Inc. is transferring land to Fins Co., a CCPC, under section 85 of the Income Tax Act. The land has an ACB of $70,000 and a FMV of $150,000. Cirrata Inc. will receive $100,000 as non-share consideration and $50,000 in
preferred shares. How much is Cirrata's income or loss for tax purposes as a result of the roll-over if the minimum allowable elected value is selected?
a) $70,000
b) $30,000
c) SO
d) $15,000
Royal Service, a large company, has offered $100 million to purchase General Manufacturing company. Royal Service is open to numerous ways to structure the deal: a stock or an asset purchase, and they are willing to give cash or their own stock. For General Manufacturing, each of the two shareholders have a stock basis of $40 million; the adjusted basis of assets is $80 million; and there is a $50 million NOL carry-forward. Discuss the Federal tax and SALT tax consequences under all scenarios. Assume the stock of General Manufacturing is owned by 50% by an individual and 50% by a C corporation. Write an IOM providing detail numbers to Royal with your recommendations
[The following information applies to the questions displayed below.]
Wasatch Corporation (WC) received a $200,000 dividend from Tager Corporation (TC). WC owns 15 percent of the TC
stock. Compute WC's deductible DRD in each of the following situations:
f. What is WC's book-tax difference associated with its DRD in part (a)? Is the difference favorable or unfavorable? Is it permanent or
temporary?
Book-tax
Difference
Favorable or
Temporary or
Permanent
Unfavorable
DRD
Favorable
Permanent
Chapter 3 Solutions
Advanced Accounting
Ch. 3 - Prob. 1UTICh. 3 - Prob. 2UTICh. 3 - Prob. 3UTICh. 3 - Prob. 4UTICh. 3 - Prob. 5UTICh. 3 - Prob. 6UTICh. 3 - Prob. 7UTICh. 3 - Prob. 1ECh. 3 - Prob. 2ECh. 3 - Prob. 3.1E
Ch. 3 - Prob. 3.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 3.3ECh. 3 - Prob. 3.4ECh. 3 - Prob. 3.5ECh. 3 - Equity method, second year, eliminations, income...Ch. 3 - Prob. 4.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 5.1ECh. 3 - Prob. 5.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 5.3ECh. 3 - Prob. 5.4ECh. 3 - Prob. 5.5ECh. 3 - Prob. 6.1ECh. 3 - Prob. 6.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 7.1ECh. 3 - Prob. 7.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 7.3ECh. 3 - Prob. 7.4ECh. 3 - Prob. 7.5ECh. 3 - Prob. 8.1ECh. 3 - Prob. 8.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 9ECh. 3 - Prob. 10.1ECh. 3 - Prob. 10.2ECh. 3 - Prob. 10.3ECh. 3 - Prob. 11ECh. 3 - Prob. 3B.1.1AECh. 3 - Prob. 3B.1.2AECh. 3 - Prob. 3B.1.3AECh. 3 - Prob. 3B.2.1AECh. 3 - Prob. 3B.2.2AECh. 3 - Prob. 3B.3AECh. 3 - Prob. 3.1.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.1.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.1.3PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.2.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.2.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.3.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.3.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.3.3PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.3.4PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.4.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.4.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.5.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.5.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.5.3PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.6.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.6.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.6.3PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.7.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.7.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.7.3PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.8.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.8.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.9.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.9.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.10.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.10.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.11.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.11.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.12.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.12.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.13.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.13.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.15.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.15.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.16.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.16.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.17.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.17.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.18.1PCh. 3 - Prob. 3.18.2PCh. 3 - Prob. 3A.1.1APCh. 3 - Prob. 3A.1.2APCh. 3 - Prob. 3A.2APCh. 3 - Prob. 3A.3APCh. 3 - Prob. 3B.1APCh. 3 - Prob. 3B.2APCh. 3 - Prob. 3B.3.1APCh. 3 - The trial balances of Campton Corporation and Dorn...Ch. 3 - The trial balances of Campton Corporation and Dorn...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Wasatch Corporation (WC) received a $200,000 dividend from Tager Corporation (TC). WC owns 15 percent of the TC stock. Compute WC's deductible DRD in each of the following situations: f. What is WC's book-tax difference associated with its DRD in part (a)? Is the difference favorable or unfavorable? Is it permanent or temporary? Вook-tax Favorable or Temporary or Permanent Difference Unfavorable DRD Favorable Permanentarrow_forwardFinancial Corporation wants to acquire Great Western Inc. Financial has estimated the enterprise value of Great Western at $104 million. The market value of Great Western’s long-term debt is $15 million, and cash balances in excess of the firm’s normal working capital requirements are $3 million. Financial estimates the present value of certain licenses that Great Western is not currently using to be $4 million. Great Western is the defendant in several outstanding lawsuits. Financial Corporation’s legal department estimates the potential future cost of this litigation to be $3 million, with an estimated present value of $2.5 million. Great Western has 2 million common shares outstanding. What is the value of Great Western per common share?arrow_forwardDowndraft has a net operating loss of $1,000,000 and no remaining assets. Everhopeful Inc buys the shares of Downdraft for $30,000 hoping to shelter its future income with Downdraft's NOL. At the time of the acquisition the government long-term tax exempt rate is 2%. The year after the acquisition the new combined entity has taxable income before any NOL deduction of $50,000. 37. How much of the Downdraft NOL can the combined corporation use? 38. Using the facts of the previous question suppose the taxable income for the combined entity for the year after Everhopefull acquired Downdraft was $500. How much of the Downdraft NOL could the combined entity use? please answer botharrow_forward
- On 1 October 2020, OXIOM purchased 200,000 equity share in Eban, a key supplier. Eban’s shares are listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE). This share purchase did not five OXIOM control or significant influence over Eban but OXIOM intends to retain the shares in Eban as a long-term strategic investment and has elected irrevocable to measure and recognize gains and losses through other comprehensive income OXIOM paid GH₵2.40 per share for these shares being their fair value at the date of purchase. Additionally, brokers charge a fee of 2% of the amounts paid to buy the shares. On 31 March 2021, Eban paid a dividend of 25 pesewas per share On 30 September 2021, information received from GSE regarding Eban’s share price indicates the fair value of the share at GH₵2.90 Required. Explain with calculations how OXIOM should account for the transactions for the year to 30 September, 2021.arrow_forwardPronghorn Ltd. is a Canadian publicly-traded business with a December 31 fiscal year end. In order to get a better return on some of its excess cash, Pronghorn purchased 150 common shares of AFS Corporation on July 1, 2023 at a price of $5 per share. Due to the nature of the investment, Pronghorn's management is accounting for the equity investment using the fair-value through other comprehensive income (FV-OCI) without recycling to net income. On August 1, 2023, AFS declared dividends of $1/share, and paid those dividends on August 20, 2023. On December 31, 2023, shares in AFS were trading at $7 per share. On September 15, 2024, Pronghorn sold the shares in AFS for $8 per share. Prepare the journal entries required to record the above transactions on the books of Pronghorn Ltd. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when the amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter O for the amounts. List all…arrow_forwardLakecraft Company has the following balance sheet on December 31, 2015, when it is acquired for $950,000 in cash by Argo Corporation: All assets have fair values equal to their book values. The combination is structured as a taxfree exchange. Lakecraft Company has a tax loss carryforward of $300,000, which it has not recorded. The balance of the $300,000 tax loss carryover is considered fully realizable. Argo is taxed at a rate of 30%. Record the acquisition of Lakecraft Company by Argo Corporation.arrow_forward
- In September 2008, the IRS changed tax laws to allow banks to utilize the tax loss carryforwards of banks they acquire to shield their future income from taxes (prior law restricted the ability of acquirers to use these credits). Suppose Fargo Bank acquires Covia Bank and with it acquires $74 billion in tax loss carryforwards. If Fargo Bank is expected to generate taxable income of 10 billion per year in the future, and its tax rate is 30%, what is the present value of these acquired tax loss carryforwards given a cost of capital of 8%? NOTE: Assume that the firm can use tax lass carryforwards to write-off 100% of its earningsarrow_forwardIn forming Parts Incorporated as a corporation, Candice transferred inventory to Parts Incorporated in exchange for 30 percent of the corporation's stock (60 shares valued at $130,000). The inventory's fair market value was $147,000 and its tax basis to Candice was $75,000. The inventory was subject to a $17,000 liability that Parts Incorporated assumed on the transfer. Candice borrowed the $17,000 from the bank (using the inventory as collateral) shortly before transferring the inventory to Parts Incorporated and used the loan proceeds to pay for a family vacation to Europe. Note: Leave no answer blank. Enter zero if applicable. Required: a. Assuming the transfer qualifies under §351 and that the liability has a tax-avoidance purpose, what gain or loss will Candice recognize on the transfer? b. Assuming the original facts, what is Candice's basis in the stock received in the exchange? c. Suppose the liability does not have a tax-avoidance purpose. What gain will Candice recognize on…arrow_forwardCompany G, which has a 30 percent marginal tax rate, owns a controlling interest in Company J, which has a 12 percent marginal tax rate. Both companies perform engineering services. Company G is negotiating a contract to provide services for a client. Upon satisfactory completion of the services, the client will pay $100,000 cash. Required: Compute the after-tax cash from the contract assuming that Company G is the party to the contract and provides the services to the client. Compute the after-tax cash from the contract assuming that Company J is the party to the contract and provides the services to the client. Compute the after-tax cash flow for Company G from the contract assuming that Company J is the party to the contract, but Company G actually provides the services to the client.arrow_forward
- Before any debt cancellation, PeppersCo holds business land with a $2,400,000 fair market value, a $1,000,000 tax basis, and a related mortgage of $3,000,000. The lender reduces the mortgage principal by $600,000. What are the Federal income tax consequences of the debt cancellation given the following independent scenarios? A, Peppers is insolvent, and the land and related mortgage are the only asset and debt, respectively. B. the mortgage is seller financing, and Peppers is solvent. C. Peppers has filed for bankruptcy and the debt is discharged by that action.arrow_forwardGaffney Corporation is a wholesale distributor of auto parts and uses the cash method of accounting. The company’s sales have been about $20,000,000 per year for the last few years. However, Gaffney has the opportunity to acquire an unincorporated competitor with annual sales of $10,000,000. What would be the tax accounting implications of acquiring the competitor?arrow_forwardSuperlor Developers sells lots for residential development. When lots are sold, Superior recognizes income for financial reporting purposes in the year of the sale. For some lots, Superior recognizes income for tax purposes when the cash is collected. In 2023, Superior sold lots for $110 million, for which no cash was collected at the time of the sale. This cash will be collected equally over 2024 and 2025. The enacted tax rate was 40% at the time of the sale. In 2024, a new tax law was enacted, revising the tax rate from 40% 10 30% beginning in 2025. Calculate the total amount by which Superior should change its deferred tax liabllity in 2024. Note: Enter your answer in millions rounded to 2 decimal places (i. e., 5,500,000 should be entered as 5, 50).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
