The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization. Introduction: It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Patel sat down with the head of public relations, the CEO, and a few Board members to weigh options. On the one hand, they knew there had already been problems along their pipeline causing health concerns a few months before. Apparently, there were substandard materials used in some of the pipeline sections that eroded which they had addressed quickly as soon as they knew there was an issue. This information was public and is one of the reasons why the media was jumping on the story. On the other hand, their pipeline was not the only one in the area. At least two other pipelines moved materials that were dangerous if released in the environment. Was the problem HFC's or another company's or maybe both or ALL? At the present moment until hazard investigation crews could investigate on- site at all the pipelines, there were more questions than answers. Patel had the accident investigation team dispatched to the area. He was debating whether he should call the other companies to jointly…

For the shift lever shown, determine the magnitude and the direction of ter imatlent yrce P that has a 210-Fb in clockwist moment about B.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Answer 6

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Answer 7

Chapter 3, Problem 1RDQ

Summary Introduction

To explain:

The two standpoints that describe the level of impact a manager could make towards the success or failure of an organization.

Introduction:

It is usually believed that managers are responsible for organizational outcomes, be it good or bad. However, there might be certain factors that are beyond their control, creating major impacts upon organizational performance. Two views suggesting the two notions above has been put forward by management experts. They explain the extent to which managers could affect organizational success or failure.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is an accepted ideology that managers have a major influence over organizational performance. Nevertheless, one could argue that managers cannot be held solely responsible for performance. There might be external factors over which they have no control. Experts suggest two standpoints that describe the two views aforesaid. The omnipotent view suggests that managers are the ones directly responsible for organizational performance. They are expected to take charge of every element that impacts upon the organization be it internal or external. Being in line with this view, managers are seen as heroes at good times and are given all the credit for positive outcomes.

On the contrary, during times of hardships, the managers are the ones held responsible no matter what the circumstances are. On the other hand, the symbolic view suggests that the extent of a manager’s ability to impact upon organizational performance is affected by external factors. Economic conditions, political climate, actions of competitors are some examples of such external factors.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 3 - Prob. 1RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 2RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 3RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 4RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 5RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 6RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 7RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 8RDQ Ch. 3 - Prob. 11ED Ch. 3 - Prob. 12ED

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 3 Solutions